Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REINSTATING THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE (and muzzling free speech)
10-28-06 | freedom4me

Posted on 10/28/2006 4:45:23 PM PDT by freedom4me

If the Dems take control of the House or Senate, I believe the first order of business will be to reinstate the fairness doctrine. This, of course, would be done to muzzle the opposition. Say goodbye to talk radio and free speech via the internet.

Vote Republican November 7.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2006 4:45:23 PM PDT by freedom4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

I don't believe they would have the votes necessary.

This would be the third rail for liberals!


2 posted on 10/28/2006 4:48:55 PM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

They won't be close to being able to do that.


3 posted on 10/28/2006 4:52:13 PM PDT by MMcC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

They'd be loading us into cattle cars for the re-education camp, if they had the power.


4 posted on 10/28/2006 4:54:08 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

If they could override a president's veto, then they'd do it.

They may also attempt to impose it in some fashion as FCC policy under a democrat president, with no legislating necessary.


5 posted on 10/28/2006 4:57:09 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

Heck, privatize the radio spectrum. Sell it off.


6 posted on 10/28/2006 4:59:24 PM PDT by IslandJeff (FR mail me to be added to the Type I Diabetes ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

Does that mean all Olberman all the time?


7 posted on 10/28/2006 5:07:31 PM PDT by appleharvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me
The Dims may or may not be able to pull that off. But, one thing conservatives always seem to do is underestimate the liberals.

A perfect example is the media. We have lots of names for them now:

The lame stream media

The dinosaur media

We even say their time of dominance is over. Yet, we have underestimated their influence once again. Yup, they may be losing profits, they may be cutting staff, but like a wounded animal, that is when they are most dangerous.

And now, this old, stiff, lame, verging on the edge of extinction media just might pull off what they have been working towards for five years: Putting Dims back in power. (I know, the congressional Pubbies have a lot to do with this but there are plenty of threads on that).

So, do not dismiss so lightly the possibility of them bringing back the fairness doctrine. This must be taken seriously and fought tooth and nail.

Never underestimate liberals!! (just look at my tagline)

8 posted on 10/28/2006 5:18:31 PM PDT by technomage (NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: appleharvey
The internet has really changed all the rules: news broadcasting; AP, UPI, Rueters; all news services; information about businesses; information about donations; pictures of Katy Couric; all changed. The playing field really is fair.
9 posted on 10/28/2006 5:22:50 PM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65
They'd be loading us into cattle cars for the re-education camp

Knowing who these hateful people are and what they believe, I think they would skip directly to the gas chambers.

10 posted on 10/28/2006 5:31:06 PM PDT by IonInsights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

There is a good reason that the Second Amendment follows the First.


11 posted on 10/28/2006 5:44:35 PM PDT by wodinoneeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

Don't know if they have the votes. But, many of them have said that is their intent when they have been on Sean's radio show.


12 posted on 10/28/2006 5:47:52 PM PDT by AmericaUnite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technomage

We do have a small advantage in that we vote for ideas, rather than against them.

Otherwise, you are completely through the uprights: the MSM still pushes the agenda, and most voters aren't FReepers.

Score again, don't try to just run out the clock.


13 posted on 10/28/2006 5:47:55 PM PDT by IslandJeff (FR mail me to be added to the Type I Diabetes ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

I am sure they would love to muzzle both the intener and the talk radio. But, they canot muzzle the internet. I really don't think they would the votes to do the same to the talk show hosts eihter.


14 posted on 10/28/2006 5:57:43 PM PDT by bilhosty (to hell with ABCNNBCBS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

You're assuming that W. would veto any reinstatement. Unfortunately, he seems to have lost his veto pen for most of the past six years. He even signed the terrible McCain Feingold "campaign finance reform" bill, so I'm not even sure if he'd veto a version of the fairness doctrine.


15 posted on 10/28/2006 6:02:35 PM PDT by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

They would have to win both the Senate and the House and have their fair haired boy/girl reside in the White House to do it.

Even then, they'd have to have a veto proof Senate. Never happen...

I will say though, I'm not convinced the right side of the isle wouldn't love to silence some of the conservative talk show hosts from time to time.


16 posted on 10/28/2006 6:02:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Corporate America will eventually silence talk radio. It is in the way of globalization and blocks the corporation from accessing cheap illegal alien labor in the US.


17 posted on 10/28/2006 6:08:14 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wodinoneeye

A very good reason.


18 posted on 10/28/2006 6:11:59 PM PDT by darkangel82 (Higher visibility leads to greater zottability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

Sorry, I don't see it happening. Advertisers run the show not Congress. How would they sell time on a liberal show?


19 posted on 10/28/2006 6:51:07 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChiMark

They don’t need any “stinkin’ votes” to do this.

All it will take is a friendly judge or an administrator in the FCC to write up a new policy letter and it’s an accomplished fact.

Remember during clinton’s first term when one of his staff said, “A new law with the stoke of a pen. Cool!” He was referring to a presidential finding that by-passed Congress.

Don’t bet the farm on it not happening again.


20 posted on 10/28/2006 7:12:16 PM PDT by Nip (SPECTRE - taking out the enemy one terrorist at a time; at night; without warning or mercy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson