Posted on 10/23/2006 12:00:01 PM PDT by blam
So right. They're really quite amazing to study.
There is a European Wild Cat (Felis silvestris silvestris) that looks just like our domestic housecat, but as I understand it, all attempts to domesticate it have failed. It's just too wild. The African Wild Cat is domesticable, and is assumed to be the ancestor of housecats.
Some years ago I had a friend who had a cat that he claimed was half Bobcat, half domestic. I don't know if such a thing is possible, but that cat actually looked like a bobcat/housecat hybrid, and it behaved like one, too. It was definitely not a purry, loveable lapcat, even though he had raised it from a kitten. It had longer legs than a normal housecat, too.
Impeccable reasoning on your part. I threw the book at a wall after a few chapters when I saw where it was going.
"....Only the elephant can dance, and it poorly...."
Cranes, on the other hand, dance elegantly.
I believe Diamond's distinction in "Guns, Germs and Steel" was in the herd nature of the animals. Ie Horses will follow their herd "leader" while Zebras will not follow the herd leader but resemble an pack of indpendant animals more. Humans can domesticate the animals that then follow them as the herd leader.
I agree Diamond is a lib. But His book does look at a larger system view of why some cultures dominate and some get wiped out. It's a good read for those interested in looking at how weapon/technology was passed/stolen among cultures. He discusses why those with domesticated animals develop immunities to germs that wipe out other cultures. Of course he missed the larger picture that those Countries that follow God and promote Freedom are More "inspired" and develop quicker. So his book is flawed in not acknowledgeing God. But as for analyzing the underlying processes that Plant and Animal domestication and transfer of technology and language among peoples, it's OK. I really thought it was a good read, and I'm a strict constitutionalist politially.
He has been criticized by the Green/Eco movement quite a bit too for the work he has done with Oil Companies, he talks about it in his next book, Collapse.
I believe you are correct. It is my understanding that all domestic cats descended from the African Wildcat, like the one pictured here:
I have also read that the domestic cat spread throughout the world so quickly because they took quite willingly to ships. Because of the rats that most ships were plagued with, sailors loved to have a good cat aboard who was happy to hunt rats all day down in the holds.
She was just keeping in practice, in case you ever kicked her out.
Good insight. Because there are tame zebras in the circus.
I'm not an expert but I believe that camels meet your definition of domesticated. (I don't think there are significant wild herds, and racing camels have been bread for hundreds of years (or more).
I don't know much about water buffalo or llamas and alpacas.
Yak wander around in herds on the Tibetan plateau?
This didn't start out as a kitty discussion, but it sort of ended up as one...
...or glove liners?
(The immortal) Thomas Nast.
Get an Ibizan Hound and you'll have no pests of any size or species.
If it can't run [or fly] faster than 40 mph, they'll catch it.
Where do Przhewalski's horses fit into this picture? I assume they are a different species than the domesticated horse.
And they fall over on their asses when you load 'em up.
Contrary to what my previous posts on this thread might indicate, there some kitties of which I approve, actively pursue.
Thank you, I agree. His attempt at an explanation was laughable.
I don't know of any evidence for that idea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.