Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shiite militia takes over Iraqi city (Sadr takes over Amarah)
AP ^ | 10.20 2006 | By CHRISTOPHER BODEEN, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 10/20/2006 5:37:47 AM PDT by Eurotwit

BAGHDAD, Iraq - The Shiite militia run by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr seized total control of the southern Iraqi city of Amarah on Friday in one of the boldest acts of defiance yet by one of the country's powerful, unofficial armies, witnesses and police said.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki dispatched an emergency security delegation that included the Minister of State for Security Affairs and top officials from the Interior and Defense ministries, Yassin Majid, the prime minister's media adviser, told The Associated Press.

The Mahdi Army fighters stormed three main police stations Friday morning, planting explosives that flattened the buildings, residents said.

About 800 black-clad militiamen with Kalashnikov rifles and rocket-propelled grenade launchers were patrolling city streets in commandeered police vehicles, eyewitnesses said. Other fighters had set up roadblocks on routes into the city and sound trucks circulated telling residents to stay indoors.

Fighting broke out in Amara on Thursday after the head of police intelligence in the surrounding province, a member of the rival Shiite Badr Brigade militia, was killed by a roadside bomb, prompting his family to kidnap the teenage brother of the local head of the a-Madhi Army.

The Mahdi Army seized several police stations and clamped a curfew on the city in retaliation.

At least 15 people, including five militiamen, one policeman and two bystanders, have been killed in clashes since Friday, Dr. Zamil Shia, director of Amarah's department of health, said by telephone from Amarah.

The events in the city highlight the threat of wider violence between rival Shiite factions, who have entrenched themselves among the majority Shiite population and are blamed for killings of rival Sunnis.

Mahdi Army militiamen have long enjoyed a free rein in Amarah, the provincial capital of the southern province of Maysan. The militiamen often summon local government officials for meetings at their offices, and they roam the city with their weapons, manipulate the local police and set up checkpoints at will.

Since British troops left Amarah in August, residents say the militia has been involved in a series of killings, including slayings of merchants suspected of selling alcohol and women alleged to have engaged in behavior deemed immoral by militiamen.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amarah; iraq; sadr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2006 5:37:48 AM PDT by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

Muqtada al-Sadr is a pos that should have been terminated a long time ago. Big Blunder by our military, imo.


2 posted on 10/20/2006 5:39:23 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

ping


3 posted on 10/20/2006 5:39:51 AM PDT by Perdogg (Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

IT's good when they congregate -- like roaches in an open cereal box at a cabin.

Cordon off the city. Jam all civilain frequencies. Prosecute the battle with extreme prejudice. Give the city back the the lawful Iraqi government.


4 posted on 10/20/2006 5:40:26 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marvlus

It might seem so in retrospect that some mistakes were made back in 2004. Fallujah should have been crushed, and Sadr and his bandites should have been taken out.

Perhaps there is still time to make up for lost time...


5 posted on 10/20/2006 5:41:56 AM PDT by Eurotwit (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marvlus

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki dispatched an emergency security delegation that included the Minister of State for Security Affairs and top officials from the Interior and Defense ministries, Yassin Majid, the prime minister's media adviser, told The Associated Press.



"Security delegation"? This sounds like a diplomatic mission.

I support our troops, the mission and the POTUS. But this is ridiculous. Paybacks and honor killings and tribalism....Iraq is just a mess.

I will vote straight *R*, but this just seems suicidal for any Iraqi government.


6 posted on 10/20/2006 5:44:04 AM PDT by reformedliberal ("Eliminate the mullahs and Islam shall disappear in fifty years." Ayatollah Khomeini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marvlus
Big Blunder by our military, imo.

Do you actually know that it was the military's decision?

7 posted on 10/20/2006 5:46:38 AM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

>>.Iraq is just a mess. <<

Make that parts of Iraq are a mess.
Have you spoken to any Iraqis lately?


8 posted on 10/20/2006 5:49:20 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
I supported the president when the US invaded Iraq in 2003, and I support him now in "staying the course" there. However, just as the "Global War on Terror" does not identify our enemies, so too, he, Rumsfeld etc have been imprecise in naming whom the enemy is in Iraq.

Al Qaeda appears to have been decimated there, but who really is fighting us - dead end Baathists, Shia death squads, Iranian agents, all of the above? We won't win until we know whom we must destroy. The president has done a bum job on this score.

Any answers?
9 posted on 10/20/2006 5:50:22 AM PDT by conservativehistorian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
Do you actually know that it was the military's decision?

To not take out the pos? Of course. If they had made the decision to take him out, they could have, and should have made the decision. When I say military, I'm referring all the way to the Commander-in-Chief.

10 posted on 10/20/2006 5:52:53 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marvlus
Muqtada al-Sadr is a pos that should have been terminated a long time ago. Big Blunder by our military, imo.

A military blunder? How about the policy makers in Washington?

11 posted on 10/20/2006 5:54:28 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

It's high time Moqtada and his "army" were taken out once and for all.


12 posted on 10/20/2006 5:54:54 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marvlus
Muqtada al-Sadr is a pos that should have been terminated a long time ago. Big Blunder by our military, imo.

A military blunder? How about the policy makers in Washington?

13 posted on 10/20/2006 5:55:58 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marvlus

You are more then accurate there marvlus.


14 posted on 10/20/2006 5:55:59 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

I'm sorry to say that Prime Minister Maliki seems to be on the side of alSadr. Iraq will never have anything more than temporary lulls in violence while alSadr is a prominent figure. Since he takes orders from Iran, they either need to get rid of him, or get rid of his masters.


15 posted on 10/20/2006 5:57:49 AM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

Big things here. If we do not have the will or the nerve to crush the cockroaches in the cereal box, that will say EVERYTHING that needs to be said about the future of our mission there. Nothing could be more clear. It's put up or shut up and go home.


16 posted on 10/20/2006 5:57:51 AM PDT by RayStacy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

You can thank Colon Powell for this situation.


17 posted on 10/20/2006 5:59:44 AM PDT by dingoMcgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit
Anyone keeping a count on how much BS could have been avoided if we only killed that fat turd Mookie back the first time we had the chance in 2003?
18 posted on 10/20/2006 6:00:03 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

If we were serious about this war we would now level Amarah.
We ceased to be serious at the point that our guys took Baghdad. Than we flipped from warfighting mode to hearts-and-mindsand it has been downhill from there.


19 posted on 10/20/2006 6:02:10 AM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativehistorian
I supported the president when the US invaded Iraq in 2003, and I support him now in "staying the course" there. However, just as the "Global War on Terror" does not identify our enemies, so too, he, Rumsfeld etc have been imprecise in naming whom the enemy is in Iraq. Al Qaeda appears to have been decimated there, but who really is fighting us - dead end Baathists, Shia death squads, Iranian agents, all of the above? We won't win until we know whom we must destroy. The president has done a bum job on this score. Any answers?

Muslims.

The way to stop Muslims from killing us is to get them killing themeselves.

20 posted on 10/20/2006 6:02:56 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Am I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? (Gal.4:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson