Posted on 10/11/2006 5:25:23 AM PDT by SJackson
Its sinister maneuvers in the Foley scandal have put George Soros' Shadow Party on a collision course with the FBI.
The Soros-funded group CREW has effectively declared war on America’s top federal law enforcement agency. CREW has called on the Justice Department to investigate the FBI. In an October 5 statement, it accused the Bureau of having “fabricated and disseminated” falsehoods about CREW, as part of an FBI “cover-up” of the Foley scandal. (1)
In the war of words now raging between CREW and the FBI -- CREW through its press releases, and the FBI through anonymous press leaks – each accuses the other of obstructing justice in the Foley investigation.
CREW started the fight with a surprise announcement on October 2. It stated at a press conference that it had obtained some of Foley’s incriminating e-mail correspondence on July 21 – two months before ABC News broke the Foley story on September 28. CREW claimed that it had sought to interest FBI investigators in the Foley e-mails, but to no avail.
“Since the FBI has known about Rep. Foley’s emails since July, the question arises: Did the administration help to cover up Rep. Foley’s conduct and leave a potential sexual predator on the loose?...” asked CREW executive director Melanie Sloan. “The American public deserves to know not just how and why members of Congress failed to take action to protect the youngsters entrusted to the care of the House of Representatives, but also why the FBI – an agency charged with protecting the public – failed to safeguard other youngsters from a potential sexual predator.” (2)
FBI sources retort that it was CREW, not the Bureau, that was playing games with the Foley evidence. According to the Washington Post of October 5:
“…unidentified Justice and FBI officials told reporters that the e-mails provided by CREW were heavily redacted and that the group refused to provide unedited versions to the FBI. One law enforcement official – speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation – also told The Washington Post the FBI believed that CREW may have received the e-mails as early as April and that the group refused to tell the FBI how they were obtained.” (3)
CREW says the G-men are lying. It has posted on its website a point-by-point refutation of their account. (4)
CREW – whose initials stand for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington – presents itself as a non-partisan, public interest group, which litigates and brings ethics charges against corrupt politicians. Its website (citizensforethics.org) states that CREW, "targets government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests. We will help Americans use litigation to shine a light on those who betray the public trust…” Despite this idealistic language, the degree to which CREW’s litigators target Republicans and spare Democrats lends credence to the view expressed by many Washington observers that CREW is little more than an attack machine for George Soros’ Shadow Party.
Shadow Party Agenda
The Shadow Party is a tightly-coordinated network of private groups through which Soros disburses campaign cash and exerts influence over the Democrats. In 2004, the Shadow Party raised more than $300 million for Democrat candidates. This gave Soros unprecedented power to bend the Democratic Party to his will. After the election, Soros operative and MoveOn PAC director Eli Pariser declared, “Now it’s our party: we bought it, we own it…” (5)
Shadow Party operative Robert Borosage expressed a similar view at the time. A hard-left militant during the ‘60s, Borosage now serves as co-director of the Campaign for America’s Future, a leftwing activist group which has received more than $300,000 from Soros’ Open Society Institute. In a November 29, 2004 article in the Marxist journal The Nation, Borosage and Nation editor Katrina Vanden Heuvel wrote:
“[P]rogressives drive this party now - we provide the energy, the organizers, the ground forces, the ideas, and much of the money. We should organize the opposition [against Republicans]. Progressives should mount a powerful assault on Republican boss Tom DeLay.” (6)
It is probably no coincidence that CREW executive director Melanie Sloan was thinking along the same lines. "Since I started [with CREW], the main thing I wanted to do was to go after Tom DeLay,” Sloan told the Wall Street Journal in May 2005. “DeLay is my top target.” The Journal reports:
"A former assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Ms.
Sloan engineered an ethics complaint against Mr. DeLay in the House,
asked the Internal Revenue Service to audit a pair of Mr. DeLay's
fund-raising committees and sued the Federal Election Commission to
obtain more information about possible financial ties between Mr. DeLay
and a Kansas utility. She also urged the Justice Department to
investigate Mr. DeLay for his role in promising fund-raising help to a
family member of Nick Smith, at the time a Republican House
representative from Michigan, in exchange for Mr. Smith's vote on
Medicare legislation." (7)
CREW was joined in its campaign against DeLay by a swarm of Soros-funded groups, all posing as “non-partisan” watchdogs – among them Common Cause, Democracy 21, Public Citizen, Public Campaign and the Campaign Legal Center. (8) The above-named groups have all received large contributions from Soros’ Open Society Institute. Common Cause has received $650,000; Democracy 21, $300,000; Public Citizen, $275,000; and Public Campaign, $1.3 million.(9) The Campaign Legal Center acknowledges on its Web site that it too has received “generous financial support” from the Open Society Institute.
Most of CREW’s targets have been Republicans. On those few occasions when it picks fights with the left, it tends to target people like Green Party candidate Ralph Nader, whom Democrat leaders regard as competitors or spoilers. (10)
On March 14, 2006, The Hill newspaper reported that CREW had targeted 14 Republican legislators for lawsuits or ethics complaints, but only one Democrat (Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas). (11)
Democrat Operatives
CREW was founded by Democrat activists Norm Eisen and Louis Mayberg. Eisen is an attorney. Mayberg is president and co-founder of the Bethesda, MD mutual fund management firm ProFund Advisors LLC.
CREW’s 990 IRS filing for 2001 lists its three founding directors as Louis Mayberg, Mark Penn and Daniel Berger. Mayberg and Berger are prominent Democrat donors. Mark Penn is a top Democrat strategist and pollster.
Penn played a decisive role in Bill Clinton's 1996 campaign, and served as head of message and strategy for Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign. Penn is a fellow of Simon Rosenberg's New Politics Institute (NPI), an important Shadow Party think tank. He is president and co-founder of the polling firm Penn & Schoen Associates.
CREW deputy director Naomi Seligman Steiner formerly served as communications director for Media Matters for America, yet another group with strong ties to Soros’ Shadow Party.
Melanie Sloan became executive director of CREW in 2003. She is a long-time Democrat operative, having served as a former aide to Rep. John Conyers and Senator Joe Biden.
Before joining CREW, Sloan served as nominations counsel for Joe Biden’s Senate Judiciary Committee (1993); counsel for the Crime Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee for Charles Schumer (1994); minority counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee under John Conyers (1995-1998); and assistant U.S. district attorney for the District of Columbia (1998-2003).
Soros Money
George Soros' Open Society Institute contributed $100,000 to CREW in January 2006. (12) More importantly, CREW has reportedly received substantial funding through the Democracy Alliance, a network of leftwing millionaires and billionaires organized by Soros. According to the Washington Post:
"...a Democracy Alliance blessing effectively jump-started
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)....
Alliance officials see CREW as a possible counterweight to
conservative-leaning Judicial Watch, which filed numerous lawsuits
against Clinton administration officials in the 1990s.” (13)
Other CREW funders include the Tides Foundation, the Barbra Streisand Foundation, the Arca Foundation, the David Geffen Foundation, the Wallace Global Fund, the Mayberg Family Charitable Foundation, the Woodbury Fund, Inc., and the Sheller Family Foundation – all institutions distinguished by their support for far-left causes. (14)
“The Mark Foley scandal is over, as the disgraced Congressman enters rehab and leaves politics forever,” states an October 4 e-mail to Nation subscribers. “But… the Republican Congressional Leadership scandal is most definitely not over.”
The Congress is well rid of Foley. No one is sorry to see him go. But, for the Shadow Party, the Foley scandal is merely a means to an end. Their goal is regime change. They will not rest until government power rests in Soros’ hands. And they will use any pretext to achieve that ambition.
Until now, CREW has met little resistance. The confidence with which it challenges the FBI bespeaks its long track record of success. It remains to be seen whether the FBI will crumble as easily before CREW’s onslaught as have so many Republican leaders.
NOTES:
1. Press Release: “CREW Demands DOJ I.G. Investigate FBI Cover-up on Inaction on Foley Emails Sent by CREW”, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), citizensforethics.org, 5 October 2006
2. Press Release: “CREW Urges DOG I.G. to Probe Why FBI Failed to Investigate Foley Emails Sent by CREW This Summer”, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), citizensforethics.org, 2 October 2006
3. Dan Eggen, “Watchdog Group Disputes FBI’s Claims on E-Mails”, Washington Post, 6 October 2006, A04
4. Press Release: “Lies vs. Facts: CREW’s Role in the Foley Scandal”, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), citizensforethics.org, 10 October 2006
5. Sam Hananel, “MoveOn to Democratic Party: 'We Own It'”, Associated Press, 9 December 2004
6. Robert L. Borosage and Katrina vanden Heuvel, “Progressives: Get Ready to Fight”, The Nation, 29 November 2004
7. Brody Mullins, “In Washington, Watchdogs Bear Watching”, Wall Street Journal, 10 May 2005
8. Alexander Bolton, “Watchdogs in Soros’s Pocket: GOP”, The Hill, March 23, 2005; Michelle Malkin, “Wobbly Watchdogs,” michellemalkin.com, June 22, 2004
9. “ The Soros Agenda: Free Speech for Billionaires Only,” The Wall Street Journal Online (OpinionJournal.com), January 3, 2004
10. Press Release: “CREW Files FEC and IRS Complaints Against Nader for President 2004 and Citizen Works”, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW), citizensforethics.org, 25 June 2004
11. Alexander Bolton, “Watchdog’s Tax Status, Politics are Questioned,” The Hill, 14 March 2006
12. Sabrina Eaton, “Watchdog Group Gets Assist from Foe Ney”, The Plain Dealer (Cleveland), 24 May 2006
13. Jim VandeHei and Chris Cilizza, “A New Alliance of Democrats Spreads Funding”, Washington Post, 17 July 2006, A01
14. Guidestar.org, FoundationSearch.com.
If CREW was withholding evidence, I think that an indictment might be forthcoming.
I hope Soros has his PJ's packed.
Since arounc 2002, I believe, there has been an outstanding warrant for the arrest of George Soros in Russia for currency tampering and money laundering. They raided his offices in Moscow and arrested some of the people there, but Soros was nowhere to be found.
His American lawyers have been able to forego extradition up to now, since we don't have an extradition treaty with the Russians, as far as I know.
It would be fitting to see him returned to Russia to face charges.
.
Until now, CREW has met little resistance. The confidence with which it challenges the FBI bespeaks its long track record of success. It remains to be seen whether the FBI will crumble as easily before CREW’s onslaught as have so many Republican leaders.
He was convicted of some sort of crime in Europe. Can't remember what. Maybe stock fraud?
No way the FBI does anything about this. This will be shot down "at the highest levels" by 10:00 this morning. The Administration will put the kibosh on it for fear of being accused of "politicizing" the FBI.
Well, let's see how well they do against the IRS...after all, they are a 501(c)3 tax-exempt group. I think it's about time someone filed a complaint.
Open secrets.org is the website of the Center for Responsive Politics, which is funded by the Open Society Institute of George Soros.How ironic.
Duh! And law-abiding, family-loving Americans who just happen to attend very large churches.
Pitted them against pastors--men and women of God--who just happen to be on television where not only millions of Americans drop by as they surf...but perhaps billions throughout the world in ramshackled, war-torn homes, hearing that message that God loves them unconditionally.
This country has been fabulous to ALL religious groups, so it's not like they have been kept down....I DON'T GET IT.
My best guess is that Hillary made use of the FBI files she had in her possession.
Didn't Condit run )oddly enough) to the FBI FIRST when the INTERN scandal hit the news? It was in 2000.
JUNE 2002 : (JOE WILSON JOINS FORCES WITH AAL, WHICH WAS HEADED BY FORMER AMBASSADOR TO MOROCCO MARC GINSBERG - See GEORGE SOROS, OPIC FUND, TURKEY) Meanwhile, in June 2002 Wilson joined forces with the Alliance for American Leadership, an antiwar-oriented, Democrat-dominated foreign policy group headed by Clinton’s former ambassador to Morocco Marc Ginsberg. While serving as ambassador, Ginsberg had coordinated new US trade and investment initiatives in the Middle East--including the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) Investment Fund, which had a Turkey-Azerbaijan project under the funding control of the Soros Private Fund Management--and now as a private citizen he consulted for companies doing business in the Middle East. . ------ "What Wilson Didn’t Say About Africa: Joseph Wilson's Silent Partners ,"via 112 posted on 04/24/2006 2:25:40 PM PDT by Fedora | To 111
The article at your link: The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power is a must read. It raises the question as to the source of Soros's finances: international drug trafficking???
Gee, I wish we had a group like this, at least they are actually active in destroying their enemy.
All we do is whine.
Now Soros' connection to film-making is interesting. Read on:
July 20, 2006
Movie Execs Charged in Money-Laundering Case
Federal prosecutors say Limelight Films was a front in international drug smuggling.
By Andrew Blankstein and Richard Winton
LA Times Staff Writers
SOURCE http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-me-limelight20jul20,1,2064177.story?coll=la-headlines-entnews
Limelight Films seemed from the outside like so many upstart production companies in Hollywood: It had a Sunset Boulevard address, a connection to Tinseltown royalty and deals to distribute a small slate of low-budget films.
But federal authorities have alleged that the film corporation was a front for an international drug-smuggling and money-laundering operation stretching from Los Angeles to Switzerland. Limelight Chief Executive Bruno D'Esclavelles of Los Angeles and Alexandre De Basseville, an executive in a Swiss financial firm that owned the film company, were among seven men arrested June 1 as part of a two-year federal investigation dubbed "Operation Director's Cut." D'Esclavelles and De Basseville were arrested in Arlington, Va., and charged with conspiracy to distribute Ecstasy.
Authorities said they learned about Limelight from an informant and set up a sting operation in which agents with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration posed as Ecstasy buyers working for South American drug dealers.
The criminal complaint alleges that Limelight executives laundered $300,000 through the film company for the undercover agents. The arrests followed numerous meetings between the agents and Limelight executives, who allegedly promised to arrange the sale of half a million Ecstasy tablets, according to court documents. Neither D'Esclavelles nor De Basseville could be reached Wednesday for comment, and the number listed for Limelight's West Hollywood offices was disconnected.
Limelight's officials described their company in news releases as being at "the forefront of every aspect of the entertainment industry, from feature films to television, commercials, music videos, and broadcasting." The company was created out of "a desire to promote worldwide talented individuals who treasure cinema and cherish the creative spirit of Charlie Chaplin."
But Limelight's creative output has been modest, consisting of a handful of documentaries such as "The Letter: An American Town," "Somali Invasion" and the feature "The Gun."
Actress and model Kiera Chaplin, 23, the granddaughter of Charlie Chaplin, serves as president of the company. Chaplin, who was once engaged to De Basseville, has not been charged with a crime. But that hasn't stopped British tabloid newspapers from using the case as headline fodder for weeks. The Sunday Mirror in London reported earlier this month that "the sexy granddaughter of Charlie Chaplin has sensationally scrapped plans to marry her mega-rich fiance after he was arrested on suspicion of drug dealing." De Basseville has often been photographed with Chaplin on the red carpets of Hollywood events.
Limelight's Chief Financial Officer David Liberman was charged with conspiracy to launder money. Also charged were Thomas Frischknecht, 26, of Switzerland, and Fabian Pruvot, 37, Andre Prikazhikov, 31, and Brian Delansky, 33, all of Los Angeles.
According to federal court documents, investigators first learned about De Basseville two years ago from an informant who told the Internal Revenue Service that De Basseville had made global investments with money laundered through Swiss banks and businesses.
The undercover agents said De Basseville told them that movies could be used to launder the money. "He stated that the dirty money goes into the movie project and comes back clean," wrote drug enforcement Special Agent James Williamson in a report contained in the court filing.
The agents met with De Basseville and several of his associates, including those charged, in Los Angeles, Miami, Virginia, Amsterdam and Geneva. Authorities alleged that the men also promised the undercover agents that they could obtain thousands of weapons, including AK47 rifles, from Russia.
"This could be the script of a Hollywood movie," said James Trump, the assistant U.S. attorney who is prosecuting the case in northern Virginia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.