To: jrooney
If the guy was 18 then this story is dead.
5 posted on
10/04/2006 5:13:27 PM PDT by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: AZRepublican
Foley is still a pervert.
17 posted on
10/04/2006 5:15:45 PM PDT by
vox_freedom
(Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
To: AZRepublican
If the guy was 18 then this story is dead.
____________
We'll have a new story, a story as big as when CBS used fake documents to attack Pres Bush.
To: AZRepublican
If the guy was 18 then this story is dead. Other than Drudge saying it, where is the proof he was 18?
23 posted on
10/04/2006 5:16:50 PM PDT by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: AZRepublican
35 posted on
10/04/2006 5:19:12 PM PDT by
digger48
To: AZRepublican
18 was legal for IM correct? and we know 17 age of consent per Gerry Studds censure. so no crime=no coverup. just a gay outed.
36 posted on
10/04/2006 5:19:29 PM PDT by
omega4179
(Islam 14 Centuries of Jihad and counting./'Rats want to turn clock back to 2000)
To: AZRepublican
Dead?!?
Since he was 18 the Democracts must DEFEND exCongressCritter Foley's actions!
47 posted on
10/04/2006 5:20:57 PM PDT by
TeleStraightShooter
(The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
To: AZRepublican
"If the guy was 18 then this story is dead."
Not if the biased mainstream media has its way.
61 posted on
10/04/2006 5:23:07 PM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(Nihilism is at the heart of Islamic culture)
To: AZRepublican
If the guy was 18 then this story is dead.We must not allow this story to die. This ship must be turned around and pointed directly at the heart of the MSM and the liberals who judged and with intrigue and lies tried to promote a lie and change an election.
To: AZRepublican
Now the story is about all the politicians who called typical sex talk between two ADULT homosexuals disgusting.
131 posted on
10/04/2006 5:33:46 PM PDT by
DManA
To: AZRepublican
are you kidding? the media will not drop this.. even if this kid was 19... they will still say.. well he COULD go after minors.. the dems are kind of spin.. they will still make it look like his fault and demand all involved to resign.
138 posted on
10/04/2006 5:35:48 PM PDT by
dcrider182
(thanks Dad ,for raising me right!)
To: AZRepublican
But I thought they had 54 IM's with more than one page.
142 posted on
10/04/2006 5:36:22 PM PDT by
carola
To: Kermit the Frog Does theWatusi; AZRepublican
AZRepublican wrote: If the guy was 18 then this story is dead.
They can't even get the math right in a homo ephebophile set-up? Don't they have "fact checkers" at DNC headquarters? Where's Geraldo when they really need him?
This is like a Marx Brothers movie. Or maybe The Three Stooges.
To: AZRepublican
Hey! Was this guy no longer an "intern" at the time of the sexual inuendos??? So, like, he didn't even work "under" Foley at the time of the incidents? So, like, Foley could truthfully say that he did not have sex with that Man, former intern yada-yada?!?!
Ok, I was just checking.
To: AZRepublican
"If the guy was 18 then this story is dead."
If the guy was 18 then the Dem's have done a hatchet job on two gay men in a consenting relationship further they have destroyed two gay people's lives for a naked power grab. I can't wait to see how this works out for the Dims.
Regardless, Foley should have been run out of town on a rail. And he essentially was. None of the rotten Dims have been. What a contrast between the parties.
320 posted on
10/04/2006 6:06:35 PM PDT by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: AZRepublican
If he was 18 then Pelosi should resign. Harman should resign. Reid should resign.
THEN we go after the dirty trick group, C.R.E.W. and go after them CRIMINALLY.
If this is true this is BEYOND STUPID.
463 posted on
10/04/2006 6:30:28 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: AZRepublican
If the guy was 18 then this story is dead. Not really the guy was still page i.e. an employee of Congress being solicited for sex by a Congressman...
But then again if ther guy is just under 18 would it make it pedophilia or more statutory rape? .. and that assuming sex...
(If it as a 17 year old girl I wouldn't call it pedophilia but attempted statutory rape)
Foley deserves to get tosses but he more in the Clltion mold of hitting on subordinates vs a child molester
If the kids under 18 it attempted statutory rape over 18 it solicited a suborned for sex
510 posted on
10/04/2006 6:36:00 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back their race over country)
To: AZRepublican
Let's hope so. Then we can get back to the good economic news and the cut and run Rats in Iraq.
To: AZRepublican
If the guy was 18 then this story is dead. Not exactly .. he still shouldn't have done it
But no crime was committed and ABC has a lot of questions to answer
765 posted on
10/04/2006 7:25:17 PM PDT by
Mo1
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - BECOME A MONTHLY DONOR)
To: AZRepublican
No - the story has taken a new turn. This means ABC did not verify information before it ran the story - did not even ascertain the age of the IM'er. "ABC: Journalistic standards? We don't need no stinkin' journalistic standards!"
853 posted on
10/04/2006 7:49:58 PM PDT by
NoBullZone
(Attempting to dispel ... bull*hit)
To: AZRepublican
The damage has been done.
Few folks listen to retractions.
1,324 posted on
10/05/2006 7:29:29 AM PDT by
Churchillspirit
(We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson