Posted on 10/02/2006 8:56:38 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
At the beginning of every school year, bad news comes from Mexican heartland states such as Zacatecas and Querétaro: Local authorities are closing hundreds of schools because so many families have moved north to the U.S. heartland.
Mexicans feel helpless before the migrant exodus, and talk about it the same way they talk about the weather. Everyone complains about it, but there´s not much you can do about it.
On Friday night, the U.S. Senate approved a 700-mile high-tech border barrier in a bid to stop the immigrant flow. The decision, a seminal event in the two neighbors´ relations, has left many Mexicans wondering if the open door to the north is closing.
Some Mexicans saw the vote as a collective slap in the face that highlighted the failure of their country´s leaders to give Mexicans a reason to stay home.
"Our politicians have not lived up to their responsibilities toward the people who migrate," said Homero Aridjis, a poet, activist and onetime Mexican diplomat. "Our government has failed before the economic and social plight of the poor."
"I´m from Michoacán," said Aridjis. "When I go there, I see fertile farmland and orchards that have been abandoned."
Few observers here expect the new barriers to stop people from Mexico and Central America from seeking a better life in the United States. New smuggling routes are expected to open through ever-more-remote stretches of desert, or over the waters of the river that Mexicans call the Rio Bravo del Norte.
WAVE OF MIGRATION
But the bill approved by both houses of U.S. Congress, and soon to be signed by U.S. President George W. Bush, might signal the end of an era that has seen dramatic cultural and demographic changes in both countries.
The wave of Latin American migration that began in the 1980s helped make Hispanics the largest minority in the United States and the largest ethnic group in Los Angeles and many other U.S. cities. The beginning of the 21st century saw Hispanic immigration spread to almost every corner of the United States, with Spanish-speaking communities booming in states such as Tennessee and Ohio.
Latin Americans see the initiative as a rejection of the cultural changes brought forth by Hispanic in the United States. In angry editorials and speeches, Mexican writers and politicians have compared the project to the Berlin Wall and the Great Wall of China.
"The exploitation of fear among the citizens of the United States has been at the center of the debate," the newspaper EL UNIVERSAL said in an editorial Saturday. "This wall, like all those built with xenophobic aims, will be far from effective."
President Vicente Fox and President-elect Felipe Calderón have denounced the new fence, as have a host of Mexican political leaders.
´SAFETY VALVE´
For decades, social scientists here have seen migration to the north as a "safety valve" that keeps Mexico from exploding into social conflict. Now, a small number of voices are saying the brain and muscle drain to the U.S. cannot continue indefinitely.
When the head of the Central Bank, the Banco de México, told a Texas newspaper last week that a new wall between the United States and his country might not be such a bad thing, his remarks were front-page news here. Surprisingly, there were few public expressions of disagreement.
"It would be best to keep its people in Mexico, and it would give incentives for Mexico to create jobs that are needed," Guillermo Ortiz, the bank official, said in an interview with the editorial board of The Dallas Morning News.
Rather than return to Mexico, many immigrants are sending for their families, accelerating the declining enrollment in rural Mexican schools, analysts say. In Zacatecas, state education officials said last month they were closing 269 schools because of declining enrollments.
CLOSING THE BORDER
Before 1929, Mexicans were not required to obtain a visa to enter the United States. Ever since, "The history of the border has been a history of closing the border," said Tony Payan, a professor at the University of Texas, El Paso and author of "The Three U.S.-Mexico Border Wars: Drugs, Immigration, and Homeland Security."
The new measures approved Friday will seal off most of the Arizona-Mexico border. Immigrant smugglers probably will move farther east, to remote crossing points on the Rio Grande upriver from the Texas cities of Eagle Pass and Del Rio, Payan said.
Wayne Cornelius of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at the University of California, San Diego, told the Judiciary Committee that even if the entire land border were sealed off, immigrant smuggling probably would move to the waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
Lorenzo Meyer, one of Mexico´s leading historians, argued that the Senate vote had revealed an essential hypocrisy in U.S.-Mexico relations.
"In 1993 we signed the North American Free Trade agreement," Meyer said. "It was supposed to be the beginning of a period of cooperation and friendship." Now the U.S. government has "unilaterally" announced the construction of a wall, he said, despite Mexico´s strenuous objections.
"We see now that the idea of a united ´North America´ is fiction," Meyer said. "The reality is the wall."
arriba, time to make a run for the border quick! (before the evil US Congress decides to put in A WALL, shock)
All of this could have been easily avoided if our politicians had only adopted reasonable enforcement measures from the outset.
They should feel helpless about what we do in the USA.
ping
They need to shut down the northern border too, it's starting to get worse in this area and there's far fewer border agents. Some of them could even be terrorists.
Americans Do Not Want A Spanish Speaking America Any More Than They Want A Mandarin Speaking America.
If americans could actual buy and OWN land in mexico perhaps some farm corporation would feel secure to move there.
Friends don't invite themselves over, and expect you to provide health care, education funds and a paycheck. There is little equality between people on welfare, and those that work their way through life. It is called a parasitic relationship, more in common with children and parents, except these children keep multiplying, and never leave the nest.
So the Mexis are upset because so many of their people abandon their homeland and move move to the U.S., and at the same time they're upset because we vote to build a wall to try to keep them out?
Perpetually upset, offended, and disenfranchised. Sounds all too familiar.
Well Mexico, if you would only keep your trash in your own yard, we wouldn't need a wall would we? Don't like the "trash" comment? Then improve the conditions inside Mexico.
"New smuggling routes are expected to open through ever-more-remote stretches of desert, or over the waters of the river that Mexicans call the Rio Bravo del Norte."
Exactly why the WALL should extend the entire 2,000 mile length of the border! And a similar wall/fence should be built simultaneously on our northern border.
Forget the wall, let's get the "Predator" to patrol our borders.....
Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kcprUAq6YQ
Wow. Something you won't see pointed out in a mainstream US news source.
"We see now that the idea of a united ´North America´ is fiction," Meyer said. "The reality is the wall."
The "idea of a United North America" has always been a fiction, you nimrod. A trade agreement is not a dissolution of borders. If I sign up for newspaper delivery, the paperboy doesn't get to own my home.
"If americans could actual buy and OWN land in mexico perhaps some farm corporation would feel secure to move there."
Exactly! If I could buy 40 acres or something in Mexico and have it mean the same thing as buying them here, people would flock to buy up land, developers would be rushing to invest, agribusiness would be booming, ...
... all of which would mean JOBS for Mexicans and no need to migrate.
As usual, though, the press and Mexican politicans put all the onus on *us* (when did we become responsible for the whole world's condition?) rather than where it lies, which is Mexico's screwed up system.
LOL!
Requiring people to pass through the legal checkpoints is not "closing" the border.
"A trade agreement is not a dissolution of borders."
You better read NATA, it's laid out in black and white.
I hate to sound so smug.. but we all knew what a WALL IS and what it does, right?
Yes Mr Meyer, the free ride is over... Now Mexico will have to deal with the actual problems instead of passing buck to the US (U.S.) :)
I'll wait for Part 13, they're usually the best one. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.