Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scottdeus12

""You know, and I'm certain, if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified reported entitled, 'Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States,' he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team," Sen. Clinton added."

...gag.....


2 posted on 09/26/2006 2:16:28 PM PDT by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: scottdeus12

Her husband??? Oh thats right they pretend they're married.


4 posted on 09/26/2006 2:17:10 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Somebody important make....THE CALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: scottdeus12

Which is it? Bill didn't take it seriously because he didn't have the information as Hillary claims?

Or is it that Bill tried and tried and tried and nobody would believe him that we needed to kill Bin Laden?

Hillary didn't watch Hubbie's meltdown apparently.


5 posted on 09/26/2006 2:18:59 PM PDT by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: scottdeus12
Two words: Able Danger.

“The Sept. 11 commission did not learn of any U.S. government knowledge prior to 9/11 of surveillance of Mohammed Atta or of his cell,” said Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana. “Had we learned of it obviously it would’ve been a major focus of our investigation.”

Hamilton’s remarks Tuesday followed findings by Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., vice chairman of the House Armed Services and Homeland Security committees, that made front-page news.

In June, Weldon displayed charts on the floor of the U.S. Senate showing that Able Danger identified the suspected terrorists in 1999. The unit repeatedly asked for the information to be forwarded to the FBI but apparently to no avail. Various news outlets picked up on the story this week.

Weldon said that in September 2000, the unit recommended on three separate occasions that its information on the hijackers be given to the FBI “so they could bring that cell in and take out the terrorists.” However, Weldon said Pentagon lawyers rejected the recommendation, arguing that Atta and the others were in the country legally so information on them could not be shared with law enforcement.

“Lawyers within the administration — and we’re talking about the Clinton administration, not the Bush administration — said ‘you can’t do it,’” and put post-its over Atta’s face, Weldon said. “They said they were concerned about the political fallout that occurred after Waco … and the Branch Davidians.”

Source

And now you know what the Bergler stole, notes related to AD. I also noted that they trotted out Gorelick to defend Clinton this week as well.

16 posted on 09/26/2006 2:26:18 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: scottdeus12
Uhhh, Hillary....Clarke was still there. Berger was still there.

You could tell she didn't like addressing this. The statement was...oh, so prepared. It really said nothing.

28 posted on 09/26/2006 2:47:53 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: scottdeus12

They already attacked in the U.S.: 1993 World trade.


35 posted on 09/26/2006 3:42:24 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: scottdeus12

Sombody put a SOCK in that woman's mouth. Gag me with a spoon. She is soooooo full of $hit. What is really shocking about her is that people WILL vote for her, given a chance, and they will take whatever she says, regardless of proof otherwise, as truth & accuracy. Oh gawd, this is so painful.


37 posted on 09/26/2006 3:55:31 PM PDT by Max7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson