The Sept. 11 commission did not learn of any U.S. government knowledge prior to 9/11 of surveillance of Mohammed Atta or of his cell, said Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana. Had we learned of it obviously it wouldve been a major focus of our investigation.
Hamiltons remarks Tuesday followed findings by Rep. Curt Weldon, R-Pa., vice chairman of the House Armed Services and Homeland Security committees, that made front-page news.
In June, Weldon displayed charts on the floor of the U.S. Senate showing that Able Danger identified the suspected terrorists in 1999. The unit repeatedly asked for the information to be forwarded to the FBI but apparently to no avail. Various news outlets picked up on the story this week.
Weldon said that in September 2000, the unit recommended on three separate occasions that its information on the hijackers be given to the FBI so they could bring that cell in and take out the terrorists. However, Weldon said Pentagon lawyers rejected the recommendation, arguing that Atta and the others were in the country legally so information on them could not be shared with law enforcement.
Lawyers within the administration and were talking about the Clinton administration, not the Bush administration said you cant do it, and put post-its over Attas face, Weldon said. They said they were concerned about the political fallout that occurred after Waco and the Branch Davidians.
And now you know what the Bergler stole, notes related to AD. I also noted that they trotted out Gorelick to defend Clinton this week as well.
YOU ALMOST HAD IT RIGHT...BUT THE WRONG 2 WORDS......THE CORRECT WORDS ARE THE "GORELICK WALL!" ........it is so ironic that that see you next tuesday would be a member of the 9/11 commission and the lib/dems are now parading her around as some trained monkey to prop up and defend clinton!!!