To: LibWhacker
Last night on Fox and on other cable stations, too, the argument seemed to be that Islam is at war with itself. We're not to inflame the extremists in any way. O'Reilly had on a Muslim spokesman who mentioned the fact that there are more than a billion Muslims (implied threat), and he was a moderate.
19 posted on
09/19/2006 2:17:49 AM PDT by
hershey
To: hershey
A moderate according to whom? He could simply have been a radical labeled a moderate as a liberal could be labeled moderate.
34 posted on
09/19/2006 2:48:21 AM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
To: hershey
1 billion jihadis?
Nuclear weapons, changing that number 500,000 at a time.
Brutal, I know. but if it ever came to that, numbers would not matter for more than 90 minutes.
Wage war to crush.
47 posted on
09/19/2006 3:44:33 AM PDT by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: hershey
There may be more than 1 billion Muslims, but there's more than 2 billion Christians. And more than 4 billion everybody else.
I'd say they were outnumbered.
59 posted on
09/19/2006 3:56:49 AM PDT by
CobaltBlue
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: hershey
So? They have a billion Muslims, that means their are 5 Billion NON Muslims in the world. And all but the very smallest sliver of the total number of nukes are held by NON Muslims. The various pseudo "moderate" Islamics talking heads might want to keep those numbers in mind.
166 posted on
09/19/2006 7:04:00 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Ann Coulter: "I love Freepers!" Told to Freeper eeevil Conservative)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson