Posted on 09/18/2006 1:53:33 PM PDT by NYer
I duuno....seems kinda funny in a great way!
Anyone remeber the palace scene from Mel Brooks'"History of the World"?
Could we substitute raggies for peasants? hehehehehe
I duuno....seems kinda funny in a great way!
Anyone remeber the palace scene from Mel Brooks'"History of the World"?
Could we substitute raggies for peasants? hehehehehe
Bass turds......
Once again the "Religion of Peace" fanatics show their affectionate devotion to peace, love and understanding. Imagine the riots that would occur if the NY Slimes published something similar about Muslims..... oh, wait, we don't have to imagine it, we've seen the response to the "Danish cartoons" controversy.
Do we have enough volunteers to pee on that fire to put it out?
see me tag...
>>However, I like the image of Pope Benedict with a shotgun. LOL!<<
Me too!
And actually my hubby is talking about hanging his rosary from HIS shotgun since he is so new to our team.
It's a four-part series showing the Pope releasing doves and then shooting them.
>>It's a four-part series showing the Pope releasing doves and then shooting them.<<
Well actually, it's JPII releasing the doves and B16 shooting them.
No way! Your basketball team hasn't won any championships yet this year.
Cartoon shows again how Islamists deplore anyone that opposes peace, or prevailing pacifistic attitudes toward their views, which peace they recognize as neccessary for them to spread their death cult.
Good shooting! ;)
Now, let's all get offended and go behead the nearest muzzies. I'm sure the Media will make nothing of it...
You know, we here in Freep land (myself included, I am not ignorant of the beam in my eye!) talk a huge line of crap about rage against muslims, we're fed up with Islamic hatred of all others, yada yada.
Seriously folks, we've talked this crap to death and the losers we voted into office aren't doing anything about them and their bloodthirsty behavior. What is a rank-and-file average, every-day infidel supposed to do to counter the Islamo-zombie horde?
Al Jazeera, N.Y. Times, Washington Post, Time, CNN, Newsweek, Boston Globe, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNBC, Fox, MSNBC, Pravda, Isvestia - they're all the same: lies, distortions, sensationalism, leftist and socialist propaganda.
via The Corner...
Let's Not Forget that... [John Derbyshire]
...Islam is a Catholic heresy. So argued Hilaire Belloc in his 1938 book The Great Heresies. The book has a long chapter titled "The Heresy of Mohammed." Sample:
Mohammedanism was a heresy: that is the essential point to grasp before going any further. It began as a hersey, not as a new religion. It was not a pagan contrast with the Church; it was not an alien enemy. It was a perversion of Christian doctrine. Its vitality and endurance soon gave it the appearance of a new religion, but those who were contemprary with its rise saw it for what it was—not a denial, but an adaptation and a misuse, of the Christian thing. It differed from most (not from all) heresies in this, that it did not arise within the bounds of the Christian Church. The chief heresiarch, Mohammed himself, was not, like most hersiarchs, a man of Catholic birth and doctrine to begin with. He sprang from pagans. But that which he taught was in the main Catholic doctrine, oversimplified. It was the great Catholic world—on the frontiers of which he lived, whose influence was all around him and whose territories he had known by travel—which inspired his convictions. He came of, and mixed with, the degraded idolaters of the Arabian wilderness, the conquest of which had never seemed worth the Romans' while...
via The Corner...
Let's Not Forget that... [John Derbyshire]
...Islam is a Catholic heresy. So argued Hilaire Belloc in his 1938 book The Great Heresies. The book has a long chapter titled "The Heresy of Mohammed." Sample:
Mohammedanism was a heresy: that is the essential point to grasp before going any further. It began as a hersey, not as a new religion. It was not a pagan contrast with the Church; it was not an alien enemy. It was a perversion of Christian doctrine. Its vitality and endurance soon gave it the appearance of a new religion, but those who were contemprary with its rise saw it for what it was—not a denial, but an adaptation and a misuse, of the Christian thing. It differed from most (not from all) heresies in this, that it did not arise within the bounds of the Christian Church. The chief heresiarch, Mohammed himself, was not, like most hersiarchs, a man of Catholic birth and doctrine to begin with. He sprang from pagans. But that which he taught was in the main Catholic doctrine, oversimplified. It was the great Catholic world—on the frontiers of which he lived, whose influence was all around him and whose territories he had known by travel—which inspired his convictions. He came of, and mixed with, the degraded idolaters of the Arabian wilderness, the conquest of which had never seemed worth the Romans' while...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.