Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Strikes Down Mo. Voter ID Law
AP ^ | 9/14/6 | KELLY WIESE

Posted on 09/14/2006 3:24:29 PM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: Huntress
They can get a free ID in MO.... but here is the catch.....


41 posted on 09/14/2006 3:49:54 PM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CAWats
How do the poor cash welfare checks w/o ID's?

With their Consular matricular cards you silly!

42 posted on 09/14/2006 3:51:58 PM PDT by navyblue (Semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Their opposition to this totally common sense idea is totally transparent.

It is amazing to me too that some states like ours have had this for years and no one says a word of complaint. Not to mention Democrats still dominate here so it's not like a lot of Demo voters are being disenfranchised.

Of course the Dems and the race baiters use this issue to further divide the nation, trying to make it sound as if blacks will be denied the right to vote. As always, I say damn them for their vile tactics. They divide Americans, then have the nerve to say Republicans do that??


43 posted on 09/14/2006 3:52:44 PM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A judge struck down Missouri's new voter identification law Thursday as an unconstitutional infringement on the right to vote.

Although it's never happened to me, I've witnessed a pretty irate, almost violent, person who showed up to vote and was informed that he already voted (while he was at work over an hour away).
I wonder who is looking out for his constitutional right to vote.
44 posted on 09/14/2006 3:54:21 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Obviously a dim....


45 posted on 09/14/2006 3:55:34 PM PDT by The Wizard (DemonRATS: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
The Missouri decision will swing the pendulum one way or the other MO law is state (trial court) judge.
46 posted on 09/14/2006 3:56:35 PM PDT by ozoneliar ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

COOL! So we know longer have to show ID when we by guns, either, since that infringes on our 2nd Amendment rights!


47 posted on 09/14/2006 3:56:58 PM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozoneliar

MO law is state (trial court) judge.



Correct, but either way he rules it will swing the process to one side or the other. Appeals will be forthcoming I'd guess.


48 posted on 09/14/2006 3:59:29 PM PDT by deport (The Governor, The Foghorn, The Dingaling, The Joker, some other fellar...... The Governor Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

These Democrats manage to see vote fraud in everything, from police highway checkpoints to the length of polling place lines. But where it really exists, in crooks taking on the I.D. of others to cast votes, well funny they can't perceive any possible voting irregularities that could come out of that, or not providing proper I.D. to prove who you say you are. No, but a police checkpoint or a long line is prima facea evidence of an attempt to commit vote fraud.


49 posted on 09/14/2006 4:00:48 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

I live in Missouri and was issued (free of charge) a voting card years ago. I have NEVER been asked to show it, so it has remained in my wallet all these years, (except when a new one is mailed each time I move, then the new one goes in).


50 posted on 09/14/2006 4:01:45 PM PDT by phil1750 (Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Callahan said the requirement is a particular burden to women and the poor. . . .

DRIVERS LICENSES NOT FREE!
Women and poor hurt most.

51 posted on 09/14/2006 4:02:22 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"unconstitutional burden on voters because the paperwork required to get those IDs is not free."

And, not only that, but felons and illegal aliens can't get the required ID cards and plan to vote for Dims.


52 posted on 09/14/2006 4:02:50 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

The second is looking more and more relevent


53 posted on 09/14/2006 4:07:30 PM PDT by jcparks (LFOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
We need a federal law requiring gov't issued photo id to vote in any federal election to take this out of the states venue...

The Constitution leaves voting procedures to the states. Not only would your recommendation be unconstitutional, I think it is bad public policy to grant the federal government more power at the expense of the states.

54 posted on 09/14/2006 4:11:12 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
JUDICIAL TYRANNY, Case # Ad Infinitum
55 posted on 09/14/2006 4:13:46 PM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyblue

Ah! (slapping forehead).


56 posted on 09/14/2006 4:13:57 PM PDT by CAWats (Post to Free Republic without knowing HTML. Click my name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
What stopps them from showing up with their birth certificate?

Sometimes it is because the birth certificate says "Mexico."

57 posted on 09/14/2006 4:14:57 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

A much more comprehensive artivle:
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/missouristatenews/story/4C1068B42A3A2478862571E90078CC25?OpenDocument

BTW: he found it violated the state constitution.
And he's nuts IMHO.


58 posted on 09/14/2006 4:16:11 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Women and poor hurt most.

Minorities! Don't forget minorities!

59 posted on 09/14/2006 4:16:54 PM PDT by CAWats (Post to Free Republic without knowing HTML. Click my name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

I don't remember the circumstances but a federal judge recently upheld a voter ID law in another state. At the time, I wondered if it might serve as a precedent.
Maybe someone will recall the article.


60 posted on 09/14/2006 4:21:03 PM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson