Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Demands ABC Fix 9/11 Movie or Pull It (just delicious)
News Max ^ | Stember 7, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 09/07/2006 9:32:04 AM PDT by yoe

An angry Bill Clinton is demanding that ABC "correct all errors” in its upcoming miniseries "The Path to 9/11” — or pull it from the air.

In a letter to ABC boss Bob Iger, Clinton refuted several of the miniseries’ assertions, including that he was too preoccupied with the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal to care about Osama bin Laden.

"The content of this drama is factually and incontrovertibly inaccurate and ABC has the duty to fully correct all errors or pull the drama entirely,” reads the letter, written by Bruce Lindsey, head of the Clinton Foundation, and Douglas Bond, a top lawyer in Clinton’s office.

The letter — obtained by the New York Post — also charges that the miniseries is a "fictitious rewriting of history.”

Clinton aides have seen only a trailer from the six-hour miniseries, which airs on Sept. 10 and 11, the fifth anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They have also received reports from political allies who have seen it.

Clinton’s office requested a copy of the docudrama, but the request was denied, Clinton spokesman Jay Carson told the Web site TPMCafe.com.

In one scene from the miniseries, an FBI agent and a CIA operative complain about red tape frustrating their attempts to pursue terrorists, according to a front-page story in the Post that refers to Clinton as "Bungle Bubba.”

The movie then cuts to a close-up of Clinton maintaining that he did "not have sex with that woman” — Monica Lewinsky — insinuating that the Lewinsky scandal was distracting him from the bin Laden threat.

Clinton’s letter notes that the 9/11 Commission’s report concluded that he was "deeply concerned” about bin Laden. In another scene, then-National Security Adviser Sandy Berger — played by Kevin Dunn — denies authorization to CIA agents about to capture bin Laden in Afghanistan.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bj; bjclinton; bluedressstains; chinesecampaignmoney; cigarholder; clintonistas; gflowers; jimguytucker; letbinladengo; liarinchief; lunaticleft; monica; ovalofficestains; pathto911; paulajones; pejury; rapist; roselawfirmrecords; scumbag; sinkemperor; stainonpresidency; stains; ultraleft; whileclintonslept; whitewater; whokilledfoster; wjc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last
To: srmorton

My thoughts exactly. Even though you've got rats screaming...there is an underlaying layer to this than is known. So who really hates the 'toons' in the dimwit party....Gore...


101 posted on 09/07/2006 10:34:55 AM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"If it makes BJ feel any better, I for one don't think that Lewinsky distracted him from the terror threat at all, because I don't see where he was ever interested in doing anything about terrorism in the first place..."



I agree. In fact, one of the biggest ironies from the Clinton administration is that in their attempts to secure a legacy of Mideast peace, they only made things worse. From the moment Clinton stepped foot in office, he was willing to do anything to secure this legacy...including ignoring the growing terrorists threat.

From the first WTC attack to the Khobar Towers to the two US Embassies and the USS Cole...Clinton refused to aggressively pursue these Islamofacists for fear it would impede his plans. The Clinton administration was so invested in this "legacy" that they even helped get Barak elected in Israel to help implement them.

The simple fact is Clinton refused to be tough on terrorists and terrorism because that would've meant attacking the very people he needed in support of his peace plan. What's so ironic is that even through all the diplomacy, appeasement and concessions (all those things liberals demand) Muslims continued to not only attack American interests...they were obviously planning their boldest plan ever, 9/11.


102 posted on 09/07/2006 10:36:17 AM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: yoe
So he is not 'requesting' that it be pulled,,,,

he is DEMANDING it???

Wow. I guess that he doesn't want any further focus on why he refused to accept Osama when Sudan offerred him to Slick THREE TIMES!!!

103 posted on 09/07/2006 10:36:59 AM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asfarastheeastisfromthewest...

They will air it...Fahrenheit runs on Direct TV on the Sundance and IFC channel (549 and 550) all the time. It has been on at least a dozen times in the past year. Sundance belongs to far left Robert Redford..sickening.


104 posted on 09/07/2006 10:37:04 AM PDT by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Truth hurts.


105 posted on 09/07/2006 10:37:11 AM PDT by sweetliberty (Stupidity should make you sterile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Given the ongoing Hoopla about this salacious simulacrum there's no @#$%$#@ way this old boy, foul mouth is going to overturn CBS table and the movable feast travels on.
106 posted on 09/07/2006 10:39:31 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

My legacy! My leeeggaaaccyyyyyy!


107 posted on 09/07/2006 10:49:05 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Incontrovertibly inaccurate? I'm still trying to figure out if that's a double-negative or isn't not.

Clinton-speak at its finest. LOL!

108 posted on 09/07/2006 10:56:24 AM PDT by talleyman (Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
YOUR EXACTLY RIGHT they MAY CAVE TO THE CLINTONS


*****WE MUST WRITE THE STATION AND ENCOURAGE THEM TO SHOW THIS MOVIE


IT IS IMPORTANT TO SHOW SUPPORT. ANYONE HAVE A WEB ADDRESS TO WRITE WITH SUPPORT FOR THE STATIONS WHICH SHOW THE MOVIE?
109 posted on 09/07/2006 10:57:43 AM PDT by Texas4ever (Anything off the dollar menu :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese
I too, think that ABC would fold but they have $40 Million. Money talks....

Let me clarify. I don't think they'll pull it. I think they'll chop it up so Clinton doesn't look bad, then air it and pretend/hope most people don't notice.

110 posted on 09/07/2006 10:59:34 AM PDT by Petronski (David Gregory is a drug-addled psychotic scumbag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: srmorton
It's a good theory and the DIMs are definitely schemers but remember Don't Assume Intelligence...especially on the Libs part.
111 posted on 09/07/2006 11:00:04 AM PDT by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

The DUmmies are FLOODING the ABC Blog with hate-filled comments...

I mean really...
HOW DARE ABC show a 9/11 movie on the anniversary of 9/11!!
Don't they realize that Democrats have an election to lose, and that's MUCH more important than reminding Americans of WHY we have to fight???

HOW COULD THEY!!!


112 posted on 09/07/2006 11:03:42 AM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: cwb

I remember through the 70s and 80s when even the media had no problem portraying Arafat as the most evil terrorist alive. I never thought we would see the day when this jihadist would be an "honored" guest at the White House and that the POTUS would be forcing an Israeli PM to shake his hand. When I saw this I remember thinking how totally f*cked up BJ's foreign policy was.

This is a scary precedent, because there's nothing to stop a future POTUS from taking the same approach with OBL and "honoring" him at the White House as some sort of "peacemaker."


113 posted on 09/07/2006 11:04:22 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Bruce Lindsay--Mr. Fiz-it pops his head up again. I wondered where that Clintanoid had slithered off to.

Somebody needs to tell him this is not another bimbo eruption and hence not part of his venue. History re-writing is left to Stephi, and the Drive-By Clintanoid journalists.


114 posted on 09/07/2006 11:06:09 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

If the Dhimms think I should have a "right" to see Fahrenheit 9/11, then as an American, I have a right to see this piece UNCENSORED!

I have put out the word about this series on the top of my blog, and I encourage other bloggers to do the same!


115 posted on 09/07/2006 11:06:23 AM PDT by vrwcagent0498 (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter are my patron saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: yoe

This recent tantrum by Bill Clinton makes him look like a complete A-S-S.......


116 posted on 09/07/2006 11:09:09 AM PDT by auto power
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auto power

Bill Clinton is a thin skinned, narcissistic, BABY!

Suck it up, Bill, you putz!

(After listening to the news at the top of the hour, I am ANGRY!)


117 posted on 09/07/2006 11:11:09 AM PDT by vrwcagent0498 (Mark Levin and Ann Coulter are my patron saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I don't know about that. There is the off-chance that ABC will air it, controvery and all, just to boost their bottom-of-the-barrel ratings.

Regardless, it will dredge up all that is known of Clinton's brunders with the Sudanese, of Mahdi Ibrahim Mohamed's (Sudan's ambassador)repeated attempts to share information, provide unlimited access in Sudan, all of which was refused by Clinton Himself. He even tried going through the back door, through multimillionaire Pakistani-American businessman and fund manager Mansoor Ijaz. a big donor to the Democratic Party, and on personal terms with Clinton, Berger, and A1 Gore.

The bottom line is Clinton dropped the ball, and 9/11 is directly HIS FAULT.

118 posted on 09/07/2006 11:14:34 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

To ABC

Show the Path to 9/11 as is. Do not edit this movie. No editing is needed. You have stated it is not a documentary.

Stand by your guns!

Michael Moore and Al Gore called their movies "documentaries" when THEY should have been classified as fiction or an opinion pieces.

The Clintonistas are out of power now, they can't harm your kids, your children or break your kneecaps. Let them scream bloody murder, all they are doing is giving ABC priceless advertising.


119 posted on 09/07/2006 11:18:00 AM PDT by listenhillary (Only the stupidest of animals fouls it's own nest - Democrats provide a fine example of this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Flood it back with nice comments, pat ABC on the back. That will really get "nice' comments flowing from the loons at DU.


120 posted on 09/07/2006 11:19:47 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson