Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dobson: Tell Arnold to halt 'gay' agenda
WorldNetDaily ^ | August 24, 2006

Posted on 08/24/2006 12:19:01 PM PDT by scripter

Christians and non-Christians alike should be alarmed by the advance in California of a series of legislative proposals that target free speech and thought, according to Focus on the Family Action.

James Dobson, the president of the action affiliate of Focus on the Family ministries, has issued an urgent call to the millions of radio program listeners to contact California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger before he is asked to sign the bills.

"What all four bills will do, they will reinforce homosexuality, bisexuality and transgenderism in a positive light," Focus State Issues Analyst Mona Passignano told WorldNetDaily.

So what's wrong with a positive light? Maybe nothing.

But, she said, "They will keep people from saying anything negative about them."

"You cannot preach the Gospel. If you want to preach about Romans 1, you can't. Someone could say, 'That makes me feel bad,'" she said. "You cannot preach what the Bible says.

"If you're a Christian, it's got to be alarming. If you are not a Christian, it's got to be alarming," she said. "Because what comes next?

"Is someone going to say, 'You can't drive a red car, that's the color of heterosexuals. You have to drive a purple car?"

She said she explains the nuances that could become law by referencing "Nazi Germany."

"It's just a historical fact, but you could make Germans feel bad every time you say Nazi Germany," she said. "The (California) bills say you can't say anything negative."

Dobson, who founded Focus in California more than two decades ago, said if those proposals become law, the California Legislature will deliver the state's children "straight into the arms of the homosexual activist community."

The four proposals are SB1437, SB1441, AB1056 and AB606. Some already have been approved by lawmakers, others await their final outcome.

Among the new laws would be one to ban the state from doing business with any company or group that does not provide benefits to workers with "domestic partners" equal to the benefits offered workers with spouses, according to Concerned Women for America.

Penny Harrington, who is the legislative liaison for Concerned Women for America of San Diego and Imperial Counties, noted there's no conscience clause, which usually is included to allow religious organizations to continue to be faithful to their beliefs.

"It's pretty ironclad," she said.

Another has a requirement for "sensitivity" training for foster parents, group home staff members and social workers about "challenges faced by gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender youth."

It also leaves to social workers to decide whether children are old enough to "consider himself or herself affiliated with a particular religion."

Perhaps the worst, Dobson said, is SB1437, which would ban any instructional materials or public school activities that "reflect adversely" on homosexuals and other alternative sexual lifestyles.

"If these bills are signed into law, who knows what the liberal courts in California will be able to make out of this in the years to come? There goes the next generation of children," Dobson said.

And he noted that churches where pastors do preach about Romans 1 would no longer to eligible to get fire or police protection, because the proposals forbid any organization that receives government funding from portraying homosexuality, bisexuality and transsexuality in a negative light.

Americans must call or e-mail Schwarzenegger to let him know their concerns, Dobson said.

"If people don't hit him hard in the next two or three days we're going to see this legislation and perhaps the other three bills the law of the land," Dobson said.

Focus Action, begun in 2004, describes itself as a political action group dedicated to keeping the moral and cultural values that founded the U.S.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: caglbt; dobson; fotf; homonazis; homosexualagenda; schwarzenegger; thepinkswastika
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2006 12:19:02 PM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scripter; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; AggieCPA; Agitate; Alexander Rubin; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail DBeers, wagglebee, little jeremiah or scripter to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 08/24/2006 12:19:59 PM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Socially liberal RINOs like Schwarzenegger, Giuliani, Pataki, McCain, Weld, etc. can advance the leftist social agenda far more quickly and with less opposition than Democrats.
3 posted on 08/24/2006 12:23:07 PM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Beat me to it. Well said, w.


4 posted on 08/24/2006 12:24:10 PM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage. Try it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scripter

Go Dr. Dobson go!


5 posted on 08/24/2006 12:24:19 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Yes, we should keep putting up guys like Bill Simon and the guy that ran against Boxer last time. That's a sure way to make sure that the Mexican Socialists take over the state.

The fact is, about 70-80% of people in California are socially liberal. You can nominate all the social conservatives you want, but they just can't win statewide office.
6 posted on 08/24/2006 12:27:50 PM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

"And he noted that churches where pastors do preach about Romans 1 would no longer to eligible to get fire or police protection, because the proposals forbid any organization that receives government funding from portraying homosexuality, bisexuality and transsexuality in a negative light. "




That's about the silliest thing I've ever heard Dobson say, and I've heard him say some really silly things.

The bill prohibits the government from funding organizations that do that. It does nothing about local services providing the usual fire and police protection.

But, hey, if it raises money for Dobson....


7 posted on 08/24/2006 12:29:18 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

8 posted on 08/24/2006 12:29:58 PM PDT by Gritty (Republicans avoid being turned into a liberal malediction only by being 100% ineffective-Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldleft
The fact is, about 70-80% of people in California are socially liberal.

Can you give a source for that?

9 posted on 08/24/2006 12:32:19 PM PDT by Tim Long (I spit in the face of people who don't want to be cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scripter
The homo agenda is all about thought control. They can't stand the idea that anyone out there condemns their behavior and thinks it's vile and disgusting. Therefore, they'll use the full power of the law to persecute such critics, if allowed.

There's plenty of historical precedent for leaders guilty of gross immorality repressing those who condemn their behavior. When you practice immorality, eventually, it owns you.
10 posted on 08/24/2006 12:36:12 PM PDT by Antoninus (Public schools are the madrassas of the American Left. --Ann Coulter, Godless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldleft
That's a sure way to make sure that the Mexican Socialists take over the state.

Honestly, when presented with a choice between a Mexican socialist and a homo-promoting Republican, I'd either not vote, or vote 3rd party. Neither choice is acceptable. We're facing that problem in NJ right now. I'm already scanning the 3rd party candidates to see who'll get my vote.

See tagline.
11 posted on 08/24/2006 12:38:48 PM PDT by Antoninus (I don't vote for liberals, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Bingo


12 posted on 08/24/2006 12:40:36 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
...about 70-80% of people in California are socially liberal.

<DRIPPINGSARCASM>
Sources: Oh, you know, the MSM, Hollywood -- the usual cast of miscreants. And if THEY say it well, golly, it MUST be true.
</DRIPPINGSARCASM>

13 posted on 08/24/2006 12:40:47 PM PDT by HKMk23 (HEY! It's past 8-22-2006 and that Knickersinawad jerk is overdue! I want Armageddon or a refund!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: oldleft

"The fact is, about 70-80% of people in California are socially liberal."

Due to PC Brainwashing the past 40 yrs!


14 posted on 08/24/2006 12:41:55 PM PDT by dcnd9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Shhhhh you'll upset the rudy and mccain fans who say you must vote republican or else your voting for a democrat.


15 posted on 08/24/2006 12:42:48 PM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

I'll try.

http://www.field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/RLS2187.pdf#search=%22california%20poll%20abortion%22


16 posted on 08/24/2006 12:42:58 PM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Socially liberal RINOs like Schwarzenegger, Giuliani, Pataki, McCain, Weld, etc. can advance the leftist social agenda far more quickly and with less opposition than Democrats.

Zing! You may have a point there. When Democrats do it, Republicans tend to find their voice.

17 posted on 08/24/2006 12:43:21 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SDGOP

It's 2006 and I am already getting tired of the Great Rudy Guiliani Pump-Up.


18 posted on 08/24/2006 12:44:46 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

supporting Arnold in 03 was a mistake.


19 posted on 08/24/2006 12:46:53 PM PDT by theworkersarefew (pence08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scripter
I'd bet that 70-80% would say they are socially liberal in public. I doubt that many would vote that way behind closed doors.
20 posted on 08/24/2006 12:49:13 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson