Keyword: caglbt

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Homosexual Activists Target California Businesses That Support Pro-marriage Proposition

    09/01/2008 10:38:10 AM PDT · by Publius804 · 38 replies · 652+ views
    LifeSiteNews.com ^ | August 29, 2008 | Thaddeus M. Baklinski
    Homosexual Activists Target California Businesses That Support Pro-marriage Proposition By Thaddeus M. Baklinski CALIFORNIA, August 29, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An upstart homosexual rights group in California has begun to target not only individuals, but also companies to which they are connected, if they have contributed money to committees that support Proposition 8, the ballot initiative to ban same-sex "marriage" in California. The Wall Street Journal reports that Californians Against Hate, a new homosexual-rights group, intends to identify and publicize corporate connections to individuals that make significant donations. Fred Karger, who runs the homosexual group, said he will compile and publish...
  • TV ad backing gay marriage doesn't mention Prop. 8

    08/24/2008 12:18:07 AM PDT · by L.A.Justice · 7 replies · 494+ views
    THE LOS ANGELES TIMES ^ | 08/16/08 | Dan Morain
    The scene plays out like a bad dream. A bride is trying to make her way to the altar, but she keeps encountering obstacles. She trips over cans tied to the back of a car; a flower girl tries to block her way; a wedding guest trips her with a cane. Finally, after the groom is restrained from going to the bride's aid, words come up on the screen: "What if you couldn't marry the person you love?" The 60-second commercial, which is now airing on cable television statewide, might look like an early salvo in the campaign to defeat...
  • "Suitable commemorative exercises" ( Homosexuality )

    08/10/2008 2:41:15 PM PDT · by kellynla · 9 replies · 464+ views
    California Catholic Daily ^ | Aug. 7, 2008 | staff
    Campaign for Children and Families (CCF), a leading California organization protecting parents' rights and children's innocence, condemns the passage of AB 2567, which will instruct all California public schools to "conduct suitable commemorative exercises" in support of the anti-religious, sexual-anarchy agenda of the late San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk. Yesterday, the California Assembly passed AB 2567 on a 43 to 26 vote, Democrats for, Republicans silently against. Earlier this week, AB 2567 passed the California State Senate on a 22-13 vote, Democrats for, Republicans against. AB 2567 now goes to Governor Schwarzenegger, whose position is unknown. "If signed into law,...
  • Ruling on ballot title is setback for Prop. 8 backers

    08/09/2008 8:23:44 PM PDT · by SmithL · 11 replies · 500+ views
    Sacramento Bee ^ | 8/9/8 | Aurelio Rojas
    In a setback for opponents of gay marriage, a Sacramento judge Friday left intact a ballot title that states Proposition 8 eliminates the right of same-sex couples to marry. Sponsors of the proposal had argued Attorney General Jerry Brown was prejudicial when he changed the ballot title – "Limit on Marriage" – that was on petitions circulated last year to qualify the Nov. 4 ballot measure. But Sacramento County Judge Timothy Frawley, who heard arguments in the case on Thursday, disagreed. "Petitioner has failed to explain why the term 'eliminates' is inherently argumentative, while the term 'limit' is not," Frawley...
  • Gay marriage ballot title won't change { Prop 8 }

    08/08/2008 1:10:01 PM PDT · by SmithL · 19 replies · 849+ views
    Sacramento Bee ^ | 8/8/8 | Aurelio Rojas
    A ballot label that declares Proposition 8 "eliminates (the) right of same-sex couples to marry" will remain intact after a Sacramento County judge today dismissed a challenge by supporters of the measure. Sponsors of the Nov. 4 ballot measure had argued that Attorney General Jerry Brown's formal title and summary of the measure were prejudicial. But Sacramento County Judge Timothy Frawley disagreed that Brown acted in favor of opponents of the measure when he changed the ballot title -- "Limit on Marriage" -- that was on petitions circulated last year to qualify the ballot measure. "Petitioner has failed to explain...
  • California Legislature Approves Gay Day in Public Schools

    08/07/2008 2:46:57 PM PDT · by Sopater · 59 replies · 1,428+ views
    CCF MEDIA: News Releases CAMPAIGN FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES For Immediate Release August 07, 2008   California Legislature Approves Gay Day in Public Schools Democrats send AB 2567 to Governor Schwarzenegger Sacramento, California – Campaign for Children and Families (CCF), a leading California organization protecting parents’ rights and children’s innocence, condemns the passage of AB 2567, which will instruct all California public schools to “conduct suitable commemorative exercises” in support of the anti-religious, sexual-anarchy agenda of the late San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk.Today, the California Assembly passed AB 2567 on a 43 to 26 vote, Democrats for, Republicans silently...
  • Prop 8 briefs: PG&E helps launch biz council

    08/05/2008 12:05:04 AM PDT · by Saundra Duffy · 9 replies · 396+ views
    Bay Area Reporter ^ | July 31, 2008 | Seth Hemmelgarn
    Pacific Gas and Electric Company has made a shareholder contribution of $250,000 to the Vote No on 8 – Equality for All campaign, and the utility will be approaching other businesses to join the fight to defeat the ballot measure. At an event at PG&E's headquarters Tuesday, July 29, Geoff Kors, executive director of Equality California, said that businesses have stood with the LGBT community in efforts to win equality, and "that's going to get us victory." "Businesses understand why this is important ... and they understand it's the right thing to do," he said, noting the value of equality...
  • Opponents Of Gay Marriage Say They'll Sue Over Changed Lanaguage In Proposition 8

    07/29/2008 4:11:38 AM PDT · by goldstategop · 15 replies · 1,007+ views
    Los Angeles Times ^ | 7/29/2008 | Jessica Garrison
    Supporters of Proposition 8, the proposed state constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage, said they would file suit today to block a change made by California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown to the language of the measure's ballot title and summary. Petitions circulated to qualify the initiative for the ballot said the measure would amend the state Constitution "to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." In a move made public last week and applauded by same-sex marriage proponents, the attorney general's office changed the language to say that Proposition 8...
  • Days of Silence

    07/08/2008 1:43:26 PM PDT · by bs9021 · 7 replies · 324+ views
    Campus Report ^ | July 8, 2008 | Bethany Stotts
    Days of Silence Bethany Stotts, July 08, 2008 Same-sex marriage isn’t the only pro-gay policy making waves in California. Now school districts with bullying problems are forming alliances with organizations such as the Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) and the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), often at the behest of the American Civil Liberties Union. Upper Lake Union Elementary School District (ULUESD) recently decided to adopt comprehensive “sensitivity” policies following an ACLU lawsuit over the alleged assault of a 14-year-old student last Fall. The ACLU recently issued a press release celebrating the out-of-court settlement with the California school district. “We’re...
  • Court Did Not Have Power To Strike Down Ban On Same-Sex "Marriage" Schwarzenegger Shirked Obligation

    07/05/2008 10:21:14 AM PDT · by Daniel T. Zanoza · 20 replies · 623+ views
    RFFM.org ^ | July 5, 2008 | Gregg Jackson
    RFFM.org Guest Column by Gregg Jackson * About a month ago, the California Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, issued a declaratory opinion that Proposition 22, which states that, "Only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California," enshrined into statutory law by 61.4% of California voters in 2000 (over four million voters), was "unconstitutional" on the basis that "gender discrimination" violates the equal protection clause of the state constitution. The LA Times reported: "The California Supreme Court struck down the state's ban on same-sex marriage Thursday in a broadly worded decision that would...
  • Amendment or Revision? ( Homosexual "marriage" )

    06/28/2008 4:42:51 AM PDT · by kellynla · 7 replies · 469+ views
    California Catholic Daily ^ | June 28, 2008 | staff
    In a press release issued last week, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal, the American Civil Liberties Union and Equality California claimed that a November ballot initiative that would define marriage as a union between a man and a woman is unconstitutional. The four groups filed a petition with the state Supreme Court on June 20, asking it to remove the initiative from the ballot because, “the rules for revising the California Constitution were not properly followed.” [[Volokh062808.jpg]]The argument of the four groups against the initiative turns on the distinction in constitutional law between an amendment and a...
  • Calif. court refuses to stay gay marriage ruling

    06/04/2008 9:34:04 AM PDT · by SmithL · 71 replies · 769+ views
    San Francisco, CA (AP) -- California's highest court has refused to stay until after the November election its decision legalizing same-sex marriage in the state. Conservative religious and legal groups had asked the California Supreme Court to stop its order from becoming effective until voters have the chance to weigh in on the issue. An initiative that would amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage has qualified for the ballot. Its passage would overrule the court's decision. The Supreme Court says its ruling will be final at 5 p.m. on June 16.
  • Ten states urge Calif. court to delay marriage ruling

    05/30/2008 11:11:45 AM PDT · by SmithL · 29 replies · 830+ views
    San Francisco, CA (AP) -- The attorneys general of 10 states are urging the California Supreme Court to delay finalizing its ruling to legalize same-sex marriage. The states involved are Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah. The attorneys general say they have an interest in the case because they would have to determine if their states would recognize the marriage of gay residents who wed in California. They want the court to stay its ruling until after the November election,
  • State: Gay marriage will begin on June 17 in California

    05/28/2008 12:36:04 PM PDT · by SmithL · 35 replies · 1,023+ views
    San Francisco (AP) -- California officials are telling county clerks that they can start issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on June 17. The state Office of Vital Records says it chose June 17 because the state Supreme Court has until the end of business on June 16 to decide whether to grant a stay of its ruling legalizing gay marriage.
  • CALIFORNIA MAJORITY BACKS GAY MARRIAGE - Field Poll director calls results a milestone

    05/28/2008 7:50:55 AM PDT · by SmithL · 91 replies · 1,784+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 5/28/8 | John Wildermuth
    In a dramatic reversal of decades of public opinion, California voters agree by a slim majority that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry, according to a Field Poll released today.By 51-42 percent, registered voters said they believed same-sex marriage should be legal in California. Only 28 percent favored gay marriage in 1977, when the Field Poll first asked that question, said Mark DiCamillo, the poll's director."This is a milestone in California," he said. "You can't downplay the importance of a change in an issue we've been tracking for 30 years."While opposition to same-sex marriage has been weakening for years...
  • Dan Walters: Fall vote on same-sex marriage looks too close to call

    05/28/2008 8:12:55 AM PDT · by SmithL · 19 replies · 865+ views
    Sacramento Bee ^ | 5/28/8 | Dan Walters
    The California Supreme Court's historic declaration that same-sex couples can marry will be tested in November when voters face a measure that would enact a constitutional ban on such marriages – and two new polls indicate that it will be a close one. The court set aside a 2000 ballot measure that barred recognition of same-sex marriages but, the new polls indicate, voters have been moving the other way. A Los Angeles Times poll of registered voters, taken on May 20-21, a few days after the Supreme Court decision, found that 51 percent disapproved of the Supreme Court's decree, while...
  • California Supreme Court asked to delay 'Marriage' Decision

    05/26/2008 7:38:48 AM PDT · by tcg · 8 replies · 450+ views
    Opponents of same sex marriage have asked the California Supreme Court to delay its decision to allow homosexual marriages until after the November election, when California voters will likely decide a proposed constitutional amendment to reinstate and preserve the previous definition of marriage. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that organizations including the Proposition 22 Legal Defense Fund and the Alliance Defense Fund filed a request seeking the delay on Thursday afternoon. "Permitting this decision to take effect immediately - in the light of the realistic possibility that the people of California might amend their constitution to reaffirm marriage as the...
  • L.A. Times: Gay Marriage Opposed by a Very Narrow 19-Point Margin

    05/25/2008 9:01:45 AM PDT · by Kleebo151 · 17 replies · 862+ views
    Patterico's Pontifications ^ | 5-23-2008 | Patterico
    An L.A. Times story is titled Californians narrowlyreject gay marriage, poll finds. A headline on the paper’s main web site speaks of the “small margin” by which the public rejects gay marriage... It turns out that the proposed amendment to ban gay marriage is “was leading 54% to 35% among registered voters.” Jeez. Only a 19-point difference! That’s certainly a “small margin”! You can’t reject gay marriage more “narrowly” than that!
  • Poll: 54 percent back California marriage amendment

    05/23/2008 2:19:39 PM PDT · by SmithL · 25 replies · 848+ views
    San Francisco, CA (AP) -- More than half of California residents would support amending the state constitution to outlaw gay marriage, according to a new poll published Friday. The Los Angeles Times/KTLA poll of 834 Californians, 705 of them registered voters, found that 54 percent of the voters surveyed backed a gay marriage ban proposed for the November ballot and 35 percent opposed it. The ballot initiative follows a May 15 ruling by the state Supreme Court legalizing same-sex nuptials. But with so many months to go before the election and the court's decision only a week old, the survey...
  • Some Logical Corollaries of California's Gay Marriage Decision

    05/19/2008 8:10:27 PM PDT · by neverdem · 51 replies · 1,300+ views
    American Thinker ^ | May 19, 2008 | Paul Shlichta
    As Lady Macbeth said, "what's done cannot be undone" -- except by constitutional amendment. In order to appease an intransigent minority group, the California Supreme Court has, in the manner of Roe v. Wade, resorted to inventing a new legal principle to justify their predetermined goal. But one does wish that they had thought the matter out a little more carefully. In creating a mechanism for justifying gay marriage, the justices have set in motion an infernal machine with consequences far beyond their limited imaginations. Cliff Thier has already pointed out that these unintended consequences may include the invalidation of...
  • Calif. Gay Marriage Ruling to Unleash Litigation

    05/19/2008 3:24:52 AM PDT · by Man50D · 14 replies · 679+ views
    CNSNews.com ^ | May 19, 2008 | Pete Winn
    The California Supreme Court's 4-3 decision last Thursday to create homosexual marriage was "a blockbuster" that sent a shockwave that will eventually reverberate in every state of the union, according to legal experts. "One of the principal effects of the California decision will be to create large numbers of same-sex marriages that will not only reside in California, but will migrate across the country," said Douglas Kmiec, a law professor at Pepperdine University Law School in Malibu, Calif. Kmiec, one of the nation's foremost legal scholars, told Cybercast News Service that the California court "tossed out the window" the view...
  • A Poll Finds Californians Still Oppose Gay Marriage

    05/24/2008 11:26:07 AM PDT · by calcowgirl · 22 replies · 511+ views
    NY Times ^ | May 24, 2008 | JESSE McKINLEY
    SAN FRANCISCO — More than half of Californians support a proposed ballot measure that would overturn a recent ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in the state, a poll has found. Fifty-four percent of registered voters would back the measure, according to the survey by The Los Angeles Times and KTLA-TV. Thirty-five percent oppose the proposed measure, which is expected to be on the November ballot. The measure, sponsored by a coalition of groups that favor traditional marriage, would define marriage as “between a man and a woman,” and effectively overturn a May 15 decision by the California Supreme Court that...
  • Schwarzenegger sees economic boost in gay marriage ruling

    05/20/2008 7:54:18 PM PDT · by calcowgirl · 129 replies · 1,657+ views
    Sacramento Bee ^ | May 20, 2008 | Kevin Yamamura
    In the wake of the state Supreme Court's recent legalization of gay marriage, the Republican governor said Tuesday in San Francisco he wants gay couples to flock to California for wedded bliss. "You know, I'm wishing everyone good luck with their marriages and I hope that California's economy is booming because everyone is going to come here and get married," said Schwarzenegger, prompting laughs and applause. The governor appeared at an Environmental Defense Fund event ... The governor reiterated that he opposes an initiative backed by conservatives to ban gay marriage in the state constitution.
  • Calif. referendum on gay marriage expected

    05/17/2008 1:59:03 AM PDT · by old-and-old · 20 replies · 585+ views
    AP ^ | AP
    SAN FRANCISCO - The California Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage will not be the last word. California voters will almost certainly hold a referendum on a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage in November, and for the first time anywhere in the U.S., the vote will have a direct and immediate effect on gay couples waiting to tie the knot. The amendment needs a simple majority to pass, and if the voters reject gay marriage, their decision will supersede the high court’s. There are signs the contest’s outcome will be close.
  • Judicial Watch Statement on CA Supreme Court Ruling that Overturns Traditional Marriage

    05/16/2008 8:12:15 PM PDT · by T.L.Sink · 24 replies · 670+ views
    Judicial Watch issued the following statement on the ruling by the California Supreme Court that imposes same-sex marriage on the state: "Today, a bare majority of the California Supreme Court, in an audacious political power grab, usurped the democratic process by redefining marriage. The laws of this nation rely on the proper functioning of the courts, including a proper balance of powers, and the judiciary's ability to demonstrate restraint. This ruling undermines the rule of law. Bigamists and other 'polyamorists' will take solace in this activist and radical ruling because, if its logic is followed, it will be difficult to...
  • 6 Points On The California Gay Marriage Ruling

    05/16/2008 4:32:55 PM PDT · by stevelackner · 13 replies · 706+ views
    STEVELACKNER.COM ^ | May 16, 2008 | Steven W. Lackner
    Six points that I feel need to be made about this ruling: 1. This Is Social Liberalism By Judicial Fiat - This ruling came from none other than the Supreme Court of California, just as Massachusets allowed gay marriage by judicial fiat. Four justices (out of seven) should not be allowed to drastically change the entire definition of an institution that has existed for thousands of years of Judeo-Christian civilization and hundreds of years of American jurisprudence. Proponents of gay marriage cannot convince citizens of a single state to allow for same-sex marriage to be for anything but a man...
  • Schwarzenegger says he respects court's marriage ruling

    05/15/2008 1:01:31 PM PDT · by ROP_RIP · 52 replies · 1,312+ views
    SJ Mercury News ^ | 05/15/2008 11:31:20 AM PDT | AP
    SACRAMENTO—Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is vowing to uphold the California Supreme Court's ruling striking down a state ban on gay marriage. The Republican governor issued a brief statement shortly after the court announced its decision Thursday. The governor said, "I respect the court's decision and as governor, I will uphold its ruling." He also reiterated his previously stated opposition to an anti-gay marriage initiative proposed for the November ballot. That initiative would write a ban on same-sex unions into California's constitution. Last month, Schwarzenegger told a gathering of gay Republicans that he would fight the initiative. The governor has twice vetoed...
  • Fresno, CA County clerk asks for guidance on GAY MARRIAGE ruling

    05/15/2008 11:32:44 AM PDT · by rface · 24 replies · 708+ views
    Fresno Bee ^ | 5.15.08 | Marc Benjamin
    Fresno County Clerk Victor Salazar anticipates the ruling could be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court....... Fresno County Clerk Victor Salazar said this morning he has asked the County Counsel for direction in light of the state Supreme Court's ruling today on gay marriage. "What we will be focused on is whether or not there is an appeal period provided. Usually, the ruling does not go into effect until the expiration of an appeal period," Salazar said. video link
  • Pelosi Statement on California State Supreme Court Ruling on Gay Marriage

    05/15/2008 12:30:30 PM PDT · by Sub-Driver · 73 replies · 1,627+ views
    Press Releases Contact: Brendan Daly/Nadeam Elshami 202-226-7616 For Immediate Release 05/15/2008 Pelosi Statement on California State Supreme Court Ruling on Gay Marriage Washington, D.C. – Speaker Nancy Pelosi released the following statement in reaction to the California Supreme Court’s decision today to strike the state ban on gay marriage: “I welcome the California Supreme Court’s historic decision. I have long fought against discrimination and believe that the State Constitution provides for equal treatment for all of California’s citizens and families, which today’s decision recognizes. “I commend the plaintiffs from San Francisco for their courage and commitment. I encourage California citizens...
  • California Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban (4-3)

    05/15/2008 10:18:34 AM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 171 replies · 5,404+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/15/08 | AP
    SAN FRANCISCO - The California Supreme Court has overturned a gay marriage ban in a ruling that would make the nation's largest state the second one to allow gay and lesbian weddings. The justices' 4-3 decision Thursday says domestic partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage. Chief Justice Ron George wrote the opinion. The city of San Francisco, two dozen gay and lesbian couples and gay rights groups sued in March 2004 after the court halted San Francisco's monthlong same-sex wedding march. The case before the court involved a series of lawsuits seeking to overturn a voter-approved law...
  • California Supreme Court Backs Gay Marriage

    05/15/2008 10:02:52 AM PDT · by NinoFan · 612 replies · 14,839+ views
    California Supreme Court Webpage ^ | May 15, 2008 | California Supreme Court
    Opinion just released.
  • California high court set to rule on gay marriage (plans to issue decision Thursday, May 15th)

    05/14/2008 12:23:13 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 53 replies · 1,287+ views
    The California Supreme Court says it plans to issue its long-awaited decision on whether to legalize same-sex marriage on Thursday. The high court announced the pending opinion on its Web site Wednesday morning. Justices heard oral arguments in a series of cases brought by gay and lesbian couples, the city of San Francisco and two gay rights advocacy groups in early March. The court has been asked to decide whether the state's one man-one woman marriage laws violate the civil rights of same-sex couples. If it rules in favor of the plaintiffs, California could become the second state after Massachusetts...
  • Calif appeals court rules in domestic partners case

    05/07/2008 1:02:55 PM PDT · by SmithL · 6 replies · 363+ views
    Santa Ana, CA (AP) -- People who mistakenly believe they are registered as domestic partners in California have the same rights as those who fulfilled terms of the state's Domestic Partner Act, an appeals court ruled. There is "no sound reason" to deprive persons of their rights if they "reasonably believed" they had registered as domestic partners, a panel of the state 4th District Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday. That reverses an Orange County court ruling which denied a gay man's 2006 petition to dissolve a domestic partnership. The man and his partner signed and notarized a 2003 partnership agreement,...
  • CA: Log Cabin Republicans release endorsements of Inland candidates

    05/03/2008 11:45:55 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 7 replies · 460+ views
    Riverside Press-Enterprise ^ | 5/3/08 | Michelle DeArmond
    The Log Cabin Republicans of California, a gay GOP organization, has endorsed a number of Inland candidates in the June primary. The group said it didn't focus on "gay issues" in making its decisions because gays and lesbians already have many rights in California. Instead, the group looked at candidates' positions on issues such as lower taxes and public safety, said James Vaughn, the Log Cabin Republicans' state director. "The gay wars are over. We've moved on," Vaughn said. "We want to support Republicans who want to win elections, not fight losing battles." The group took neutral positions on some...
  • Backers of Calif. gay marriage ban ready to submit petitions

    04/21/2008 4:34:23 PM PDT · by SmithL · 14 replies · 524+ views
    AP via SFGate ^ | 4/21/8 | LISA LEFF, Associated Press Writer
    San Francisco, CA (AP) -- Supporters of an initiative that would outlaw same-sex marriage in California say they have enough signatures to qualify the measure for the November ballot. A coalition of religious groups called Protect Marriage collected more than 1.1 million signatures in support of the proposed constitutional amendment. The initiative needs 694,354 signatures, or 8 percent of the votes cast in the last governor's race, to make it onto the ballot.
  • Schwarzenegger shifts gay marriage stand

    04/11/2008 4:28:51 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 25 replies · 787+ views
    AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/11/08 | AP
    SAN DIEGO - California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says that if an initiative to ban gay marriage qualifies for the November ballot, he's prepared to fight it. California's governor spoke Friday in San Diego at the convention of the Log Cabin Republicans, the nation's largest gay Republican group. He has previously vetoed bills that would have legalized gay marriage. A Schwarzenegger spokeswoman did not say what prompted the governor to shift his position. Schwarzenegger said he was confident a ban would never pass in California and called the effort "a waste of time."
  • Schwarzenegger says he would fight efforts to ban gay marriage

    04/11/2008 3:21:03 PM PDT · by NormsRevenge · 42 replies · 1,014+ views
    Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger says if an initiative to ban gay marriage qualifies for the November ballot, he's prepared to fight it. California's governor was in San Diego Friday speaking at the annual convention of the Log Cabin Republicans, the nation's largest gay Republican group. Schwarzenegger said he was confident that a ban would never pass in California but called the effort "a waste of time" - joking that he wished activists would focus on allowing naturalized citizens to run for president instead. A Schwarzenegger spokeswoman did not say what prompted the governor to shift his position. He has previously vetoed...
  • California's top court ponders gay marriage

    03/04/2008 1:42:44 PM PST · by Anti-Bubba182 · 26 replies · 160+ views
    Reuters ^ | 3-4-08 | Adam Tanner
    SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Four years after San Francisco ignited a heated national debate by briefly allowing gay marriage, California's top court hears arguments on Tuesday about whether matrimony should be limited to a man and a woman. The hearing brings into focus the highest-profile U.S. fight over gay rights in recent years and the outcome could end up influencing legislation and litigation in other states on a matter that has been a hot-button issue in election campaigns. "California's a bellwether state. What happens here, blows east," said Larry Bowler, a retired deputy sheriff from Sacramento, who opposes gay marriage,...
  • CALIFORNIA: State Supreme Court takes up same-sex marriage

    03/03/2008 7:45:16 AM PST · by SmithL · 25 replies · 151+ views
    San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 3/3/8 | Bob Egelko
    As gay-rights groups call for marital equality and opponents warn of a public backlash, societal decay and religious conflict, the California Supreme Court is prepared for an epic three-hour hearing Tuesday on the constitutionality of the state law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. It shapes up as the most momentous case the court has heard in decades - comparable to the 1981 ruling that guaranteed Medi-Cal abortions for poor women, the 1972 ruling that briefly overturned the state's death penalty law, and the 1948 decision, cited repeatedly in the voluminous filings before the court,...
  • California Here I Go

    02/13/2008 1:11:48 PM PST · by bs9021 · 10 replies · 97+ views
    Campus Report ^ | February 13, 2008 | Malcolm Kline
    California Here I Go by: Malcolm A. Kline, February 13, 2008 If you can’t beat ‘em, leave ‘em. Noted author, attorney and activist Phyllis Schlaffly has some characteristically sage advice for Golden State parents upset with the manner in which homosexuality will be handled in California public schools thanks to a law recently signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. “Many of us have worked to reform public schools,” the Christian Newswire reported the lady as saying. “Unfortunately, SB 777 and the related legislation represent a repudiation of 2,000 years of Christian moral teaching on human sexuality, marriage, and the family.” “The...
  • California ripped as 'too queer for school'

    02/13/2008 3:56:43 AM PST · by Man50D · 82 replies · 131+ views
    WorldNetdaily.com ^ | February 12, 2008
    If you care about your children, then you should homeschool, find a Christian school, participate in a homeschool co-op, pay the tuition, drive an older car, or do whatever is necessary to keep them out of California's public school system. That's the message from a new campaign, assembled under the Rescue Your Child slogan. And it's all because the California Legislature and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger worked together to establish Senate Bill 777 and Assembly Bill 394 as law, plans that institutionalize the promotion of homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism and other alternative lifestyle choices. First, [California] law allowed public schools to voluntarily...
  • New Law Redefines Gender in California Schools

    01/14/2008 9:05:22 AM PST · by kellynla · 27 replies · 795+ views
    newsmax.com ^ | January 11, 2008 | Lowell Ponte
    Last Oct. 12, California’s Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law a controversial Democratic-authored measure, SB 777, that subtly redefines how sexuality and gender may be taught and dealt with in public schools. This law had been held in abeyance until this month while conservatives were given 90 days to collect signatures to qualify a June ballot referendum that would let voters approve or overturn it. On Thursday, the referendum deadline, activists acknowledged that they had fallen short, gathering only 350,000 of the 433,971 signatures required. With the new law in effect, said referendum supporter Karen England, executive director of...
  • The most ignored stories of 2007 (5. California bill introducing homosexuality to young children)

    01/05/2008 5:25:36 AM PST · by wintertime · 14 replies · 64+ views
    WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 5, 2008
    5) California bill introducing homosexuality to young children: Children as young as two years of age are in the bull's-eye of coming changes in California's school curriculum, which "gay rights" advocates now admit will alter the very foundation of information presented to public school classrooms. Opponents of a new state law that bars "discriminatory bias" in public schools because of a "characteristic," including "perceived gender," argued before its passage that it would foster a pro-homosexual bias that would eliminate references to "mom" and "dad" or "husband" and "wife." Supporters steadfastly maintained the bill only clarified anti-discrimination laws already on the...
  • CA: Don't be fooled by false claims on SB 777 (Sheila Kuehl commentary - Barf Alert!)

    01/04/2008 9:28:22 PM PST · by NormsRevenge · 17 replies · 102+ views
    North County Times ^ | 12/28/07 | Sheila Kuehl
    When society tells a young person ---- in subtle or, often, not so subtle, ways ---- that they are less valuable, perhaps because of the color of their skin, their religious practices or the gender of the person they want to take to the prom, the whole society suffers. When we mandate that every young person must go to school, we must also provide the safety and dignity of an education free from harassment, discrimination and violence. That is why, over the last several years, I have authored several laws that strengthen civil rights protections for students and improve school...
  • CALIFORNIA: Domestic partners get same property tax break as surviving spouses

    01/04/2008 8:02:10 AM PST · by SmithL · 12 replies · 53+ views
    San francisco Chronicle ^ | 1/4/8 | Bob Egelko
    Domestic partners in California won the right to the same property tax breaks as husbands and wives under state law Thursday when the state Supreme Court turned down an appeal by county assessors. The justices left intact an October ruling by an appeals court in Sacramento that allowed registered domestic partners - same-sex couples, or unmarried heterosexual couples in which one partner is at least 62 - to accept or inherit real estate from one another without new tax assessments. That's a significant advantage under Proposition 13, the 1978 initiative that rolled back property taxes to 1 percent of value...
  • Just the facts on SB 777 (CA Schoolchildren Can Now Choose Their Own Sex)

    12/31/2007 4:28:53 PM PST · by lowbridge · 41 replies · 50+ views
    http://www.nctimes.com ^ | December 29, 2007 | ROBERT TYLER
    Just the facts on SB 777 By: ROBERT TYLER Forget everything you learned in kindergarten about the difference between boys and girls. According to Gov. Schwarzenegger and the California Legislature, schoolchildren can now choose their own sex. I'm not talking about choosing "sexual behavior or sexual preferences." Kids are going to be taught that they have the right to completely ignore their physical anatomy and choose the status of being "male" or "female." Ignore your common sense, ignore your chromosomes and ignore your anatomy. This is what your politicians want to teach your kids in school. After all, California's kids...
  • Crossing Over (transgendered)

    12/28/2007 9:48:54 PM PST · by neverdem · 31 replies · 146+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | December 28, 2007 | NAOMI SCHAEFER RILEY
    "What will prevent the 250-pound linebacker from deciding he wants to share the locker room with the cheerleaders?" Deconstructionist professors have been trying for years to convince us that gender is a social construct. Now, it seems, politicians and even employers are doing their best to put this theory into practice--2007 may go down in history as the year of the transgendered person. Take the announcement in October that, under a state law that takes effect in January, schools in California not only can't discriminate by sex but also can't take into account "a person's gender identity and gender related...
  • True Lies - Starring Gov. Arnold Schwarzennegger (The Truth About The Governator And SB777 Alert)

    12/19/2007 8:50:32 AM PST · by goldstategop · 8 replies · 141+ views
    Flash Report ^ | 12/19/2007 | Meredith Turney
    They say that true character is seen under pressure. Perhaps the inverse is true for politicians. When it comes to the pressure of facing the electorate during voting season, some politicians will adopt the character or policies that will get them elected. But when the pressure of re-election is lifted, these officials’ true character is unmasked. Governor Schwarzenegger’s signing of SB 777 is the most glaring example of this sad truth. During last year’s legislative session the governor was wary of signing any legislation that would anger specific voting blocks that could help him win re-election. Such was the case...
  • Revealed: 'Gay' plans to target 2-year-olds

    12/18/2007 4:51:48 PM PST · by wagglebee · 129 replies · 357+ views
    WorldNetDaily ^ | 12/17/07 | Bob Unruh
    Children as young as two years of age are in the bull's-eye of coming changes in California's school curriculum, which "gay rights" advocates now admit will alter the very foundation of information presented to public school classrooms. Gov. Schwarzenegger A list of school resources, sponsored by a homosexual-advocacy group called Safe Schools Coalition, suggests that for those who are only two years old, there's "Felicia's Favorite Story," which tells how she was "adopted by her two mothers." The list also promotes a book called "Are You a Girl or a Boy?" by Karleen Jiminez, a resource for children ages...
  • Stripped bare: 'Gay' school plot unveiled

    12/12/2007 3:57:12 AM PST · by Man50D · 50 replies · 97+ views
    WorldNetdaily.com ^ | December 11, 2007 | Bob Unruh
    On the heels of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's signature on S.B. 777, which opponents describe as a homosexual indoctrination plan for education districts, a pro-homosexual lobbying organization in California has launched its campaign to infuse a "gay" influence into public school curricula. The Gay Straight Alliance recently forwarded an e-mail to its California chapters with information on how to make sure homosexuality is taught in the state's schools, and warned that having students and parents simply "tolerate" homosexuality simply is not enough. "In many schools, learning about LGBTQ issues takes the form of very necessary tolerance education where students are educated...