Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Electron-spin' trick boosts quantum computing
NewScientist Tech ^ | 16 August 2006 | Unattributed

Posted on 08/21/2006 7:17:02 PM PDT by annie laurie

A new silicon chip capable of manipulating the spin of a single electron could ultimately allow futuristic quantum computers to be built using conventional electronic technology, researchers say.

A quantum bit, or "qubit", is analogous the bits used in conventional computers. But, instead of simply switching between two states, representing "0" and "1", quantum physics permits a qubit to exist in more than one state simultaneously, until its state is measured.

This means quantum computers can essentially perform multiple calculations at once, giving them the potential to be exponentially more powerful than conventional computers ...

'Breakthrough experiment'

Researchers have also created qubits from the "up" or "down" spin-states of electrons on quantum dots. But they lacked the ability to control the state of a single electron well enough to perform calculations using them. A team led by Lieven Vandersypen at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands has now created a device that can manipulate a single electron using conventional microchip fabrication technology.

"This is a breakthrough experiment," says Guido Burkard, a physicist at the University of Basel in Switzerland, who was not involved in the research. "A major benefit of making a qubit using this method is that they are built upon existing semiconductor technology." This should make the qubits easier to scale up into larger systems, he adds ...

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientisttech.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: computer; electron; quantum; qubit; spin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Excerpt-only site.
1 posted on 08/21/2006 7:17:03 PM PDT by annie laurie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

Amazing. What will the next 50 years bring us? (assuming tomorrow isn't the end of the world)


2 posted on 08/21/2006 7:28:01 PM PDT by highimpact
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
quantum physics permits a qubit to exist in more than one state simultaneously, until its state is measured.

What if we accelerate to the speed of light but don't otherwise change when we were going to measure it? (I really don't even understand what I'm asking....)

3 posted on 08/21/2006 7:33:50 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie; Mycroft Holmes

ping


4 posted on 08/21/2006 7:34:16 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highimpact

With this kind of computing speed, perhaps pcs will soon acquire 'artificial intelligence' and then determine that humanity is the enemy....

Day of Teminator???


5 posted on 08/21/2006 7:37:06 PM PDT by auzerais (Congress is the only whorehouse in America that loses money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: auzerais
With this kind of computing speed, perhaps pcs will soon acquire 'artificial intelligence' and then determine that humanity is the enemy....

Only if computers devolop liberal tendencies.

6 posted on 08/21/2006 7:38:18 PM PDT by highimpact
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

Imagine a computer as intelligent as a genius-level human (150+ IQ) but able to process information a million times faster than a human. Now imagine a network of a million of these computers all working together. Wow. Let's be sure to install a way to turn the whole thing off, just in case.


7 posted on 08/21/2006 7:45:58 PM PDT by TampaDude (If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the PROBLEM!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highimpact

They better hurry and get this down to the marketing folks!


8 posted on 08/21/2006 7:56:58 PM PDT by Boiler Plate (Mom always said why be difficult, when with just a little more effort you can be impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TampaDude
Now imagine a network of a million of these computers all working together. ...Let's be sure to install a way to turn the whole thing off, just in case.

Not to worry. They're running Windows XP.

9 posted on 08/21/2006 8:08:59 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
A new silicon chip capable of manipulating the spin of a single electron

If the spin is 'manipulated' it's an unnatural quantum electrodynamic action.

Schroedinger's Cat anyone?

10 posted on 08/21/2006 8:20:43 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

So, would quantum computers be faster, hold more data?


11 posted on 08/21/2006 8:28:51 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auzerais

More intelligent computers won't be sentient computers.


12 posted on 08/21/2006 8:30:29 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
More intelligent computers won't be sentient computers.

They won't actually have to be sentient to achieve sentient behavior...'Chinese Box' and all of that...
13 posted on 08/21/2006 8:45:03 PM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
"So, would quantum computers be faster, hold more data?"

Yes--both, and very likely prompt new approaches to software development.
14 posted on 08/21/2006 9:11:37 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

Problem is : qubits are still the olde morse code of dit-dah-dit : 01101110 : rapidly flipping a switch on and off is all digital is. It comes from turing(who committed suicide)and the early ENIAC days when they used thermally noisy vacuum tubes, the best signal-to-noise ratio was on-off-on-on-off... With photonics there is a vastly better way to compute : light wavelengths : a million+ vs the 2 of dit-dah-dit digital. Storage? Slow light(down to 37 mph). Prisms, lenses, mirrors, fiber optics and source? A 25 watt incandescent light bulb should do. Then there's intensities, polarization angles....your own color TV screen could list a number so HUGE, and thus information, that you could never read it in arabic numerals...every .1 second. The tools are all there, why hasn't anybody made a photonics computer, and left qubits in the dust?


15 posted on 08/21/2006 9:21:54 PM PDT by timer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
"God? What's a qubit?"
Bill Cosby, sort of.
16 posted on 08/21/2006 10:05:04 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Yes, artificial cognition would be a real breakthrough.


17 posted on 08/21/2006 10:08:34 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

But although they could be smart, they should not have the same rights as humans. If the smartest chimpanzee is smarter than the dumbest human (a very long stretch, even including infants), the chimpanzee is still an animal and the human is still a human. For example, the chimpanzee could be eaten, but the human shouldn't be.


18 posted on 08/22/2006 12:10:50 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.answersingenesis.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: timer

IBM Research
Silicon nanophotonics
http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/photonics.index.html


19 posted on 08/22/2006 12:15:26 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: timer

Press coverage
http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/research_projects.nsf/pages/photonics.press.html


20 posted on 08/22/2006 12:16:48 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson