Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting. What a joke. I'm sorry you can stop one terroist..ooops..that would be a military use... so sorry about that.
1 posted on 08/14/2006 7:13:03 PM PDT by nycoem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: nycoem

I am sure the terrorists will respect their little obscure clause. Yep, really sure.


2 posted on 08/14/2006 7:15:51 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem; Swordmaker

How many armies does the Open Source Project have?


3 posted on 08/14/2006 7:17:07 PM PDT by Petronski (Living His life abundantly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

That would seem to allow anti-materiel defensive use (e.g. anti missile missile, blow up empty buildings)


4 posted on 08/14/2006 7:17:15 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

Smart idiots.


5 posted on 08/14/2006 7:17:45 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

There clause won't hold up under the Open Source GPL, on which they are basing their licensing. Their license is invalid and therefore anyone can use their software any way they see fit, now, HAHAHA!!


7 posted on 08/14/2006 7:19:00 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

"Open source operating systems can steer warplanes and rockets. "

Uh yeah sure. I can imagine taking that one up the chain. Not a chance it would happen post Clinton.


8 posted on 08/14/2006 7:19:20 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

Oh, I'm sure that China, Iran, and Cuba would never violate that license agreement.

Just once, it would be SO COOL to be a leftist dictator of a country, where one of these moonbats would come to me, decrying how I violated his license agreement, after agreeing not to... It would be so much fun to look into his eyes, and tell him, "Well, the reason I didn't follow your guidelines, is because I didn't want to. Now, I'm going to kill you. Bye bye!"

Mark


9 posted on 08/14/2006 7:24:46 PM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

GPL licenses should prohibit use by terrorists.


11 posted on 08/14/2006 7:30:38 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem
Open source operating systems can steer warplanes and rockets. [This] patch should make clear to users of the software that this is definitely not allowed by the licenser."

I am so much looking forwarding to observing the (attempted) enforcement of stupidities such as this. The Left SO unhinged from reality it is unbelievable.

12 posted on 08/14/2006 7:30:40 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | Hezbo:1 Israel/Bush/Rice/StateDept: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

pretty ironic considering the internet was created...drum roll.....FOR THE MILITARY!!!!!


13 posted on 08/14/2006 7:34:33 PM PDT by JacksonCalhoun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

These gentlemen need a re-introduction to The First Law of Stupidity.


17 posted on 08/14/2006 7:47:16 PM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline has been Reutered. (Can you tell?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

The military gave them the interntet (and a million other things), and these granola tech weanies now suggest something so laughable. Phat chance.


18 posted on 08/14/2006 7:58:52 PM PDT by Notwithstanding (OEF vet says: I love my German shepherd - Benedict XVI reigns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

Actually, this could be a back-door way to hamstring the US Miliary. So much software is written using open source now, if this becomes widespread you could have fringe legal groups going to court, trying to halt fielding or deployment of weapons based on this clause. The software might not even be in there--just the ACCUSATION that is is in there could be enough for some fool judge to issue a devastating ruling.

Think it can't happen? I'm sure people said the same thing about gay marriage not too long ago.


19 posted on 08/14/2006 7:59:04 PM PDT by rbg81 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

The militaries these idiots need to worry about
(PRC, PRK, Iran, Russia & their stooges) will not
honor the license terms.

There are already too many public license variants.
If the free & open source community starts to further
balkanize and politicize their terms, they are going
to further screw up distros (which are already wringing
their hands over the inclusion of free binary-only code).

Maybe I need to release some code that excludes
Democrats.


20 posted on 08/14/2006 8:00:03 PM PDT by Boundless (Imagine if Fox had a news channel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem

What a bunch of jackholes. And I'm an OS user and advocate. The military should honor their silly license, develop a version from scratch better than theirs, and then release it under an open source license, beating their version to a pulp in the marketplace of ideas.


21 posted on 08/14/2006 8:03:10 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem
They call it a "no military use" modified version of the GNU General Public License (GPL).

They should be more honest. What they really want to say is "no American military use", but that would be too blatant even for them.

The Free Software movement has many people who would be very comfortable in the Communist party...

22 posted on 08/14/2006 8:05:19 PM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem
Open source operating systems can steer warplanes and rockets. [This] patch should make clear to users of the software that this is definitely not allowed by the licenser."

There are severe security problems with using open source software in military systems.

There are some military applications where its use is allowed, but not many.

23 posted on 08/14/2006 8:06:07 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem
references the world of ham radio, whose rules specify that the technology is not to be used commercially

I have no idea how this is a relevant comparison.
25 posted on 08/14/2006 8:08:06 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem
...neither does he believe software developers or distributors have the right to try to control other people's activities through restricting the software they run.

The Open Source movement has a death wish.

27 posted on 08/14/2006 9:20:38 PM PDT by Tax Government (Defeat Islamic imperialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nycoem
Then, by definition, it's not "Open Source."
33 posted on 08/15/2006 3:56:56 AM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson