Posted on 08/12/2006 4:54:55 PM PDT by doug from upland
Although the mainstream media has refused to report it, defendant Bill Clinton has a date in a Los Angeles Superior courtroom next March in Paul v Clinton. His wife, daughter, and several of the Hollywood elite will be subpoenaed to testify. So will Ed Rendell. Are you listening, Swanny?
Three days after the carpetbagging junior senator from New York raked in a million bucks at the most spectacular private concert ever seen in Los Angeles, Lloyd Grove wrote a story in the WASHPOST about her largest donor's felony conviction from the 1970s. That August 15 story presented her with a problem. Since that day, Hillary has been hiding from the voters the identity of her largest contributor. For background, SEE HILLCAP.ORG.
For over five years, Hillary has been getting away with the largest campaign finance fraud in history right in broad daylight. When Paul's background was discussed in the WASHPOST, she trotted out her mouthpiece, the always entertaining monkey on a leash, Howard Wolfson. Wolfson claimed they didn't take any money from Paul and wouldn't take any money from him. Yeah, Howard, what is a $1.6 million (in-kind) among friends.
Ed Rendell, come on down. It is soon going to be time for you to tell your story. You see, Ed was the one who introduced Peter to the wonderful world of Democrat giving. Unfortunately, that has not always worked out well for the donor.
Below is a portion of the call sheet from Peter's Stan Lee Media office callsheet that was subpoeaned by the FBI. It is part of the record. On Aug. 14, the day before the story ran in the WASHPOST, Rendell made an emergency call to Peter to warn him what was coming. He explained that Peter needed to just play along and not make any waves. They would do damage control until it blew over.
As you can see, Rendell called just in time with the warning. Grove called 39 minutes later. Oh, what a tangled web the criminal enterprise called the Democrat Party has woven. See you in court, Ed.
All Hillary had to do was file an accurate FEC report and David Rosen would have never faced criminal trial. Her latest report was filed in January, as demanded by the FEC, and she once again failed to come clean. I guess we have come to expect that. She listed Stan Lee as a 225K donor, although Lee testified he gave no money. We reported an exclusive conversation with Lee several months ago.
In the fourth fraudulent FEC report, Hillary listed Peter's company as the donor, although he gave the money personally. She knows that, but she can't use his name because Wolfson told the public they they didn't and wouldn't take any money from him.
Hillary has filed a totally bogus declaration with the court, and she has set up her own daughter to have to commit perjury to protect her political future.
This has been an incredible challenge, but we hope to have at least a 30-45 minute promo version of INDICTING HILLARY out in the next couple months. Things have happened to people and equipment. Gee, it is almost as if something demonic is going on. How many of you would be surprised?
That should be entertaining.
Ping
bttt
Let's just same I'm playing a number of roles. :)
Way to go Doug!!
BTTT
Was wondering when our dear, sweet Hillary and some of her cohorts, would be called on the carpet for this...
OMG! What's Peter's screen name? God bless you both for your persistance in seeking justice for that evil woman, Hillary Clinton.
Unbelievable...what a complete crook, criminal Hildabeast and Bildabeast and NOW Childabeast....
ping
Peter participates occasionally, but he lurks often. He is: krucader_bravepages_com
May God bless and protect you, Doug.
From your keyboard to God's pc screen.
Rendell backed Burkle bid for PNI (Dinosaur Media/DNC Collusion Alert)
Thanks for the link. Burkle is bad news, pardon the pun.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.