Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel puts ground offensive on hold
Yahoo News ^ | 09/09/2006 | By RAVI NESSMAN, Associated Press

Posted on 08/09/2006 10:12:29 PM PDT by garbageseeker

JERUSALEM - Israel has put its massive new ground offensive into southern Lebanon on hold for two or three days to give the U.N. Security Council more time to come to an agreement on a cease-fire, an Israeli Cabinet minister and senior officials said Thursday.

Israel's Security Cabinet on Wednesday approved an expanded ground offensive in Lebanon, but Prime Minister Ehud Olmert decided to put the campaign on hold temporarily to see whether diplomatic efforts will produce results, a senior Israeli government official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

Asked by Israel Radio about the delay, Cabinet minister Rafi Eitan said: "There are diplomatic considerations. There is still a chance that an international force will arrive in he area. We have no interest in being in south Lebanon. We have an interest in peace on our borders."

The United Nations has been under tremendous pressure to agree quickly on a cease-fire to end the fighting that has caused widespread destruction across southern Lebanon and forced hundreds of thousands of Israelis into bomb shelters. Israeli officials implied they would halt the new offensive if a cease-fire agreement removes Hezbollah from the border.

Diplomatic efforts to reach a quick U.N. resolution have faltered over differences between Washington and Paris on an Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon. France backed Lebanon's call for Israeli troops to pull out once hostilities end, while the United States supported Israel's insistence on staying until a robust international force is deployed. Lebanon has offered to send troops to patrol the border region.

Despite the delay in the offensive, Israeli troops, backed by tanks and armored vehicles, entered several southern Lebanese towns early Thursday and took up positions, witnesses said.

Hezbollah said its guerrillas were engaged in "a violent confrontation" with Israeli forces whose tanks tried to advance toward the border town of Khiam, the group's Al-Manar television reported. Israel Army Radio reported that heavy battles were in progress in south Lebanese villages across from Israel's Galilee panhandle, hard hit by rockets.

No further information was immediately available.

The new advances came a day after Israel suffered its highest death toll in a single day, with 15 soldiers killed. The fighting has killed at least 829 people on both sides.

The dispute between the co-sponsors of the draft Security Council resolution — France and the U.S. — sparked a flurry of meetings Wednesday and raised the possibility of rival U.S. and French resolutions — or no resolution at all for the time being.

The White House said Wednesday neither Israel nor Hezbollah should escalate their war. Press secretary Tony Snow said the U.S. message was for both sides.

French President Jacques Chirac appealed for rapid agreement.

"The most immoral of solutions would be to accept the current situation and give up on an immediate cease-fire," he said.

In a televised speech, meanwhile, Hezbollah's leader taunted the Israelis.

"If you enter our land, we will throw you out by force and we will turn the land of our invaluable south into your graveyard," Sheik Hassan Nasrallah said. "We will be waiting for you at every village, at every valley. Thousands of courageous holy warriors are waiting for you."

Nasrallah rejected a draft U.N. resolution that would temporarily let Israeli troops remain in south Lebanon and take defensive action.

"The least we can describe this (draft resolution) is as unfair and unjust. It has given Israel more than it wanted and more than it was looking for," he said. He also signaled Hezbollah's intention to step up attacks, calling on Israeli Arabs to leave the northern city of Haifa so Hezbollah could pound it with rockets and not worry about killing fellow Muslims.

Israel's expanded ground offensive would seek to force Hezbollah guerrillas — and their short-range rockets — out of southern Lebanon and past the Litani River, about 18 miles north of the border. If successful, it would leave Israel in control of a security zone that it evacuated six years ago after a bloody 18-year occupation.

Israeli officials said Wednesday before the delay that the new offensive was meant to run parallel to the cease-fire talks.

"Israel is still working for a diplomatic solution, preferably in the Security Council," said Isaac Herzog, a member of Israel's Security Cabinet, which voted Wednesday to approve the new ground offensive. "We cannot wait forever, we have a million civilians living in bomb shelters, and we have to protect them."

Other officials said privately that the offensive was aimed at pushing the Security Council to take fast action, as well as to clear Hezbollah from south Lebanon.

"The Israeli decision today is taken in absence of concrete steps by the international community to deal with the situation in Lebanon. Such steps would of course make an Israeli military operation superfluous," Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said. "Israel understands fully that the real solution is diplomatic."

Before the Cabinet decision, fighting intensified in the border strip that 10,000 Israeli troops were already occupying four miles into southern Lebanon.

Fifteen Israeli soldiers were killed Wednesday, the military said, the highest one-day total in the Israel-Hezbollah conflict. Nine died when Hezbollah anti-tank rockets hit a building and one was killed by an Israeli tank shell, the military said. The military said 38 soldiers were wounded in battles across south Lebanon.

Israel also hit Lebanon's largest Palestinian refugee camp with an airstrike, killing at least two people. Israeli attacks Wednesday killed eight Lebanese civilians, according to Lebanese officials, and three guerrillas, according to Hezbollah.

An Israeli TV station, quoting unidentified sources, said Iranian Revolutionary Guard soldiers were among the Hezbollah dead. The Israeli military was unable to confirm the report. Israel has charged that Iran is aiding Hezbollah on the ground as well as supplying the guerrillas with weapons. Iran has denied the charges.

Israeli warplanes also dropped leaflets over the southern port city of Tyre and over Beirut proper for the first time. The fliers criticized Nasrallah, saying he was "playing with fire" and that the Lebanese people were "paying the price."

Hezbollah fired at least 170 rockets into Israel on Wednesday, the army said.

Since the fighting began, at least 711 people have died on the Lebanese side of the conflict. The Israeli death toll stood at 118, including 36 civilians and 82 soldiers.

Israel's Security Cabinet was told a new offensive could mean 100 to 200 more military deaths, according to a participant. Military officials said it would take the army several days to reach the Litani and then several more weeks to rid that area of Hezbollah's fighters and rocket launchers.

"The assessment is (the new offensive) will last 30 days," said Trade Minister Eli Yishai, a member of the Security Cabinet who abstained from the vote. "I think it will take a lot longer."

The offensive was expected to eliminate 70-80 percent of Hezbollah's short-range rocket launchers, senior military officials said.

The offensive was approved 9-0, with three abstentions at an intense six-hour meeting. During the meeting, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and they spoke for half an hour, Israeli officials said. Upon his return to the room, Olmert told the ministers the offensive would be accompanied by a diplomatic initiative.

The government's decision came two days after Lebanon offered to send 15,000 soldiers to patrol the border region, a key Israeli demand intended to prevent attacks on Israel. The current fighting began when Hezbollah fighters crossed into Israel on July 12, killing three soldiers and capturing two others.

In a major shift, Nasrallah said Hezbollah supported a deployment by the Lebanese army after a cease-fire is declared and Israel leaves.

Israeli officials remained skeptical of the Lebanese offer and were not convinced Lebanon's army would take concrete action to stop Hezbollah attacks.

"It is important that the Lebanese army will be accompanied by an international force that will enable it to reach the south in an organized manner, and to leave the place clean of Hezbollah," Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said.

Some soldiers said Israel was having trouble controlling even the small strip it was already occupying.

"The biggest problem is still the existence of Hezbollah fighters all over the place, even though we have most of the territory under control," said Maj. Avi Ortal, an officer in a reserve brigade in southwestern Lebanon.

"Hezbollah are good fighters. They know the territory. They live there and they have had six years to build compounds," he said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; groundwar; idf; justkidding; lebanon; makepretendwar; rrhlebanon; waronmilitantislam; warwedontmeanit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 08/09/2006 10:12:30 PM PDT by garbageseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
The stupidity of Israeli politicians never ceases to surprise me. They've always exceeded my low expectations of them.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

2 posted on 08/09/2006 10:14:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

This a suprising development. I am disappointed that Olmert would do this.


3 posted on 08/09/2006 10:16:00 PM PDT by garbageseeker ("The best form of defense is attack." -Karl Philippe Gottfried von Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
I am disappointed that Olmert would do this.

Not me. He is a coward.

4 posted on 08/09/2006 10:16:49 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

translation:

Israeli politician loses his cajones


5 posted on 08/09/2006 10:17:38 PM PDT by weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Anybody have muti source confirmation?


6 posted on 08/09/2006 10:17:59 PM PDT by afnamvet (It is what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
PEACE IN OUR TIMES..

not

7 posted on 08/09/2006 10:18:18 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

big mistake, if true...


8 posted on 08/09/2006 10:18:47 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
The last 4 weeks has been a Really Really Hard exercise we've seen before - on more spectacular scale. But the bottom line is, thanks to the fecklessness and timidity of Israel's leaders, Hezbollah will probably emerge with enhanced stature and prestige in the Islamic and Muslim world and have over time an even deadlier arsenal facing Israel. Olmert had his chance to shine as an Israeli leader and blew it.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

9 posted on 08/09/2006 10:19:43 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

I believe that the IDF itself is concerned that it may not be able to remove Hez. I think this is a valid concern, and that unless they strike Syria to eliminate Hez supply lines, this would be an exercise in futility.

I feel they should strike Syria and enter south Lebanon. But any half-measures would be sure to fail.
10 posted on 08/09/2006 10:19:57 PM PDT by Civ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

No chance of a coup by BiBi? Sharon in a coma is more competent than Olmert.


11 posted on 08/09/2006 10:20:04 PM PDT by peyton randolph (No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

The Israeli-Hezbollah conflict is a microcosm of the West and the War on Terror: a failure of will


12 posted on 08/09/2006 10:20:08 PM PDT by Cyclopean Squid (Being That Guy so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

The government will come down before the nation of Israel fails to finish this war. Even the left in Israel supports this war.


13 posted on 08/09/2006 10:20:29 PM PDT by thoughtomator (The worst thing about censorship is XXXXXXXXXXXXX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

In fairness, it could mean "Israel has put its massive new ground offensive into southern Lebanon on hold for two or three days to give the troops time to rest and train, and to position forces and supplies."


14 posted on 08/09/2006 10:20:39 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Pray for peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

Disinformation ?

Hopes to watch Hez movements/resupply/repositioning - "smoke 'em out"?

A gotcha in there somewhere .. we'll sit tight unless we see ... ?

Or just new generation wusses in charge?


15 posted on 08/09/2006 10:21:22 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

While I sympathize with what you are saying and I defintely want Hezbollah destroyed myself, I think that Israel is playing the right card here. They don't lose surprise by putting off the assault as there was none to begin with. We also know that an occupation of Southern Lebanon does nothing for their long term goals as this was tried before.

Basically we are looking at an attempt by Israel to say to the world that frowns on them "Look, we are willing to hold back our assault so that you can figure out something that will bring peace here." It's the political game card. If nothing gets done they will say "See you can't do it so we have to do it ourselves." If a meaningful force is assembled of troops(my hope would be Nato) that could not just watch Hezbollah build up again I think that would be great for all parties involved. If not like I said Israel loses no advantage by waiting and only puts itself in a position to say to the world "You can't figure it out so we will.".


16 posted on 08/09/2006 10:21:39 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
The IDF as of August, 2004 had (according to unofficial estimates) 168,000 personnel, including 107,500 conscripts. The army had 125,000; the navy had 8,000; the air force had 35,000. Full mobilization to 576,000 could be quickly achieved with the reserves of 408,000

According to Wikipedia.

17 posted on 08/09/2006 10:21:39 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican (Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Civ
I feel they should strike Syria and enter south Lebanon.

With a simultaneous U.S. air strike on Iran's nuke facilities coupled with the take down of Mookie the mad cleric and public hanging of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Would solve a lot of problems in the Mid-East.

18 posted on 08/09/2006 10:22:15 PM PDT by peyton randolph (No man knows the day nor the hour of The Coming of The Great White Handkerchief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Yes, the Israeli government will not survive this. This war has exposed serious deficiencies in the conduct of Israel's civilian leadership and its military. The repercussions are going to be through and severe once the nation finds it was let down.

(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)

19 posted on 08/09/2006 10:22:22 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

If the war does not go well you, may find Olmert without a job and Bibi as Prime Minister.


20 posted on 08/09/2006 10:22:29 PM PDT by garbageseeker ("The best form of defense is attack." -Karl Philippe Gottfried von Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson