Now hold on a second.. if you were talking about some regular property owner fine.. but you are talking about a King. A line of people that ruled the land by force if necessary and took what they wanted.
Magna Carta ring a bell?
Kathleen Blanco went to Nepal recently and addressed the Nepalese parliment:
"You need to redistribute all Nepalese wealth to everyone in Nepal, Look at my wonderful city of New Orleans."
Yes, Sarcasm here.
:-)
"Now hold on a second.. if you were talking about some regular property owner fine.. but you are talking about a King. A line of people that ruled the land by force if necessary and took what they wanted."
I visited Nepal back when Birendra was still king. He was NOT what you'd call an enlightened monarch. The police would snatch people off the street and from their homes and beat them with canes for opposing the king. The roots of the Maoist uprising started a long time ago.
The Communists could care less about the King or his subjects. The point is to destroy and then take over Nepal. Period. This method is referred to as a war of national liberation, and it adapts its tactics to the unique circumstances of each country. "Such a war can pit industrial workers against capitalists, as in Russia, Catholics against Protestants, as in Northern Ireland, blacks against whites, as in South Africa--or Arabs against Jews, as in Israel." The point is to further World Revolution.
Here's a little something to begin your education:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1666922/posts
You're gonna love this guy.
i thought magna carta was just some delimitations on John's powers over his nobles. I wonder how many of them did it because he hit on their wives, something he was apparently notorious for.
Not in this case. The King owns 4000 acres, not the whole country. He's already not much of a king as kings go.