Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon silent on inquiry into Cunningham contracts
San Diego Union - Tribune ^ | 8/4/06 | Otto Kreisher - CNS

Posted on 08/04/2006 12:27:47 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – Eight months after former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham confessed to taking massive bribes in exchange for providing at least $230 million in questionable defense and intelligence contracts, the Defense Department inspector general still has not determined whether any of those projects were improper.

This week, the Pentagon announced that it would not renew one contract related to the scandal. But officials have been tight-lipped about the status of other taxpayer-funded work that may have been tainted, including a secret counterintelligence program. In fact, although several other Defense Department public affairs personnel and a congressional press aide have said in the past that an investigation into the Cunningham-linked contracts was being conducted, the inspector general's spokesman said yesterday that “as a matter of policy, we do not confirm or deny the existence of ongoing investigations.”

“If one exists, it would be improper to comment,” Army Lt. Col. Brian Maka said. “Obviously, if one does not exist, there would be nothing to say.”

There also have been no formal findings presented by the House panels on which Cunningham served while he channeled taxpayer dollars to two companies that gave him at least $2.4 million in cash, antiques and other gifts.

Cunningham pleaded guilty Nov. 28 to conspiracy and tax evasion. He admitted demanding and receiving cash and gifts from MZM, a Washington-based defense contractor, and Poway-based ADCS.

In return, he used his position as a senior member of the House Appropriations and Intelligence committees to steer more than $150 million in contracts to MZM and more than $80 million to ADCS, mainly through earmarks.

The former Navy fighter pilot is serving more than eight years in federal prison.

MZM founder Mitchell Wade pleaded guilty to bribing Cunningham and is awaiting sentencing. ADCS head Brent Wilkes has not been charged.

Several times since Cunningham admitted providing the earmarked appropriations to the two defense contractors, Pentagon public affairs officers have said that “there is an ongoing review by appropriate organizations within the department.” One spokeswoman cited the Defense Department inspector general as the office responsible for that investigation.

The House Intelligence Committee hired an independent counsel to conduct a review of Cunningham's work on that panel. It has not formally announced the results of that review, though committee members reportedly have been briefed on some of the findings.

The House Appropriations Committee is not conducting its own investigation because the panel is closely following an investigation of the contracts by the Pentagon's inspector general, committee spokesman John Scofield said.

“Of course we're concerned; of course we're monitoring the investigation – we've been monitoring it for some time,” Scofield said in March.

Although Cunningham did not serve on the House Armed Services Committee, its chairman, Duncan Hunter, R-Alpine, has ordered a review of its records by committee lawyers from both parties to see if there were any attempts by Cunningham to influence the panel's actions.

So far, the staffers have not found any improper action.

Although the Pentagon has not confirmed that any of the contracts linked to Cunningham were unwarranted, it announced Monday that it would not renew a $9 million contract awarded to MZM in 2003, forcing the closure of the Foreign Supplier Assessment Center in Martinsville, Va.

The center was set up to conduct background checks on foreign companies doing work for the Defense Department. It was once at the top of Cunningham's priority list, according to prosecutors. The most recent earmark for it was arranged by Rep. Virgil H. Goode Jr., R-Va., who received sizable campaign contributions from Wade and his family and associates.

Congress approved the funding less than a month after Cunningham admitted his misdeeds. The Pentagon, which never requested the money, said the operation was terminated because “the U.S. government has other entities that provide similar services.” In documents released before Cunningham was sentenced, prosecutors said it was “possible to attribute specific defense contract funding of Cunningham's co-conspirators to Cunningham's corrupt official acts.”

Projects cited in the documents included work on the Foreign Supplier Assessment Center; the National Ground Intelligence Center, a support facility for the Army; a top-secret program called CIFA, or Counterintelligence Field Activity; the Defense Joint Counterintelligence Program, which is part of CIFA; and Global Infrastructure Data Capture, a program to convert government documents into a digital format.

A spokeswoman for the Project on Government Oversight, which has been following the Cunningham scandal, said the group did not understand why the Pentagon inspector general could not determine the propriety of those contracts after eight months. The Foreign Supplier Assessment Center was being run by Athena Innovative Solutions, which acquired “selected assets” of MZM, including “all of the existing contracts,” in August 2005, according to a news release issued at the time by Athena's parent company, New York-based Veritas Capital.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 109th; adcs; athena; brentwilkes; contracts; corruption; cunningham; dod; dukecunningham; earmarks; goode; govwatch; inquiry; mitchellwade; mzm; pentagon; silent; veritas

1 posted on 08/04/2006 12:27:48 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Murtha is also reportedly complicit in some pretty shady dealings.
ABSCAM, and others.
(chirp, chirp).
2 posted on 08/04/2006 12:30:12 PM PDT by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The former Navy fighter pilot is serving more than eight years in federal prison.
------
While Randy stood up and admitted his crime, scum like Clinton still walk our streets and NEVER GOT THIS TYPE OF PUBLIC SCRUTINY...especially on Chinagate. If he had, he would be serving eight LIFE sentences...


3 posted on 08/04/2006 12:32:29 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The MSM cannot stand that the DoD actually believes in NOT COMMENTING on active investigations.


4 posted on 08/04/2006 12:33:38 PM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

"While Randy stood up and admitted his crime, scum like Clinton still walk our streets and NEVER GOT THIS TYPE OF PUBLIC SCRUTINY...especially on Chinagate. If he had, he would be serving eight LIFE sentences..."

It always makes me wonder why President Bush selected Bill Clinton to co-chair Tsunami and Katrina relief efforts with George H.W. Bush and why the President joked in the State of the Union address about Bill Clinton being his father's favorite person.


5 posted on 08/04/2006 12:57:32 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
The first thing clinton did was fire all 93 US Attorney Generals and replace them with his own lackeys.
This is the main reason both him and his wife are not in jail.
6 posted on 08/04/2006 12:58:22 PM PDT by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikeybaby

The first thing clinton did was fire all 93 US Attorney Generals and replace them with his own lackeys.
This is the main reason both him and his wife are not in jail.
------
This was their attempt at ABSOLUTE POWER. These power-mad criminals knew they could not achieve it through the legislative branch so it had to be done through the judicial. And they did a pretty good job -- because, as you note, it kept them out of jail. Pure criminal evil personified.


7 posted on 08/04/2006 1:04:28 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I thought the Clintons were investigated by 3 Independent Counsels: Robert Fiske, Judge Kenneth Starr and Robert Ray.


8 posted on 08/04/2006 4:47:02 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
The were but they have the goods on everyone in DC and no one dares to risk their jobs or their lives on a criminal prosecution. In the end, if one were to go after the Clinton's they would get a hung jury due to a Clinton Sycophant that will without a doubt find their way onto the Jury.
9 posted on 08/04/2006 4:54:10 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

So the Clintons "have the goods" on three Republican Independent Counsels? You are accusing those men of unknown offenses that the Clintons would have had the goods on them about.
Independent Counsels work with Grand Juries not trial juries. The old cliche is that a prosecutor can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich if he wants.
Three independent counsels COULD have indicted the Clintons and had the trial juries let the conviction/hung jury/aquittal chips fall where they may. Even TRIALS are politically damaging to politicians--ask Scooter Libby or Duke Cunningham.


10 posted on 08/05/2006 9:54:51 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson