Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the Media Enable Terrorism
The American Thinker ^ | 8/2/2006 | Rachel Neuwirth

Posted on 08/02/2006 6:57:00 AM PDT by Dark Skies

A major segment of the global media is behaving in a manner that makes terrorism and mass killings more likely rather than less likely. They enable and encourage terrorist slaughter of innocents by supplying providing a propaganda bonanza for the terrorist cause. Without the gain, there would be less incentive for the horrific behavior.

This is true now with Israeli defense measures against Hezbolla terrorism, and has been true for many years, especially during the long Arab-Israeli conflict. Not enough attention has been paid to media manipulation. It is long overdue that this be exposed and the media be confronted and held accountable.

The general public derives its perception of the wider reality beyond direct personal experience via the media. When the major media all sing a similar tune the public generally assumes it is being honestly informed. The internet and talk radio often challenge the major media, but not everyone has the time or interest to become well-informed on the many issues and sort things out, especially when the alternative media also present conflicting views of reality.

The major media can spin and color stories to suit their agenda. They can rile up the public over certain issues or hide vital information. When the media riles up the public, governments can feel pressured to act in one direction or the other. All this conflicts with honest reporting.

A prime example involves a front page photo in the New York Times. An angry Israeli policeman is seen brandishing his police club while standing over a bloodied man on the ground. The Times caption reads:

“An Israeli policeman and a Palestinian on the Temple Mount”.

The photo suggests a Palestinian so badly beaten that blood was running down his face. Publishing such an inflammatory photo had to generate extreme outrage against Israel, and the Times had to know it.

But the caption was effectively a lie.

The victim was a Jew beaten by Arabs. The Israeli policeman was defending the victim. When the Times was forced to retract they did it grudgingly and then added another lie to the story until public outrage forced them to come clean with the real story. The action of the Times (“All the news that’s fit to print”) was so outrageous that a media watchdog organization was born in response.

Please go here and see “The photo that started it all” on the top right. Then read the details of how the New York Times prints ‘All the news that fits.’ There is no mention that anyone at the Times was punished. If the once-prestigious New York Times can be so deceptive we are now in a new era of extreme media dishonesty and must be extra vigilant.

In the Arab – Israeli conflict, Israel’s Arab enemies long ago developed an effective way to promote anti-Jewish terror and win the public relations battle in the process. Yasser Arafat early on employed the tactic of shooting at Jews from behind Arab women and children which were used as shields. The Israelis were caught in a dilemma. Not to fire back meant being helpless to respond to the ongoing slaughter of Jews. But to fire back meant unavoidable loss of Arab civilians, including children. And with a complicit media conveniently present (by appointment?) to see and film and later to edit. The resulting story would emphasize the retaliation over the provocation, making it seem as if Israel was deliberately targeting Arab civilians. Reality would be a product manufactured to suit.

This tactic required the willingness of Arab leaders to deliberately sacrifice many Arab civilians in the process of attacking Israel. Many Arabs have long been brainwashed via their schools, their media and their mosques to see Israelis, and even all Jews, as monsters bent on their destruction. This made it easier to keep them compliant with these tactics. Also, any Arabs who objected could be killed.

In Lebanon today Hezbollah is employing the same tactic. Their rocket attacks often originate from within civilian areas which will assure civilian casualties. They, and their supporters, accuse Israel of deliberately targeting civilians. If Israel really wanted to target civilians it would not take a full week of intensive bombing to kill 250 people.Many in the media have now joined the chorus of “disproportionate response” and ‘targeting of civilians’. They call, in effect, for a one-sided cease fire where Israel ‘ceases’ and Hezbolla remains free to ‘fire’.

It would help if Israel and her friends would make it clear to all that Israel only targets sources of aggression. But the media, by their skewed reporting, is making it politically profitable for Hezbolla to locate rocket launchers in the midst of civilian areas. This reinforces the Hezbolla tactics and increases the civilian death toll.

The major media are thus directly complicit in enabling this tactic to continue and for more Lebanese civilians to be killed. If the major media would tell the whole truth and place the blame entirely on the Hezbolla terrorists it would no longer be politically profitable to continue this tactic. People who care might communicate to the media on this and even send them a copy of this article as back-up.

It would also help greatly if Israel would explain more clearly that:

1. It makes great efforts to not attack innocent civilians.

2. It will target every rocket launcher, no matter where it is located, and it is the responsibility of Hezbolla and the Lebanese to remove civilians from that area.

It would also help if the American Jewish leadership would finally wake up and show the complicity and culpability of the U.S. media in the killing of Lebanese civilians. This would at least take the political and public relations profit out of terrorism.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; israel; nyt; qana; wot

1 posted on 08/02/2006 6:57:01 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

It is what has been said about the complicit, pro-terrorist MSM. Over and over. They aren't fooling anyone, but themselves.


2 posted on 08/02/2006 7:00:34 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

To see recent examples documented by EU Referendum regarding Qana:

Milking it?
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/07/milking-it.html

We Need to know the Truth
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/08/we-need-to-know-truth.html

Game, set and match
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/08/game-set-and-match.html


3 posted on 08/02/2006 7:12:41 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1320747/posts
George Soros, Media Connections - Bump List


4 posted on 08/02/2006 7:14:17 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Excellent..

BTTT


5 posted on 08/02/2006 7:16:38 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet-pray for Israel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

We confront the MSM with their duplicity, then what? Just goes into the "memory hole", shelved and forgotten, THEY certainly are not the ones who will report the facts concerning their own chicanery to the public.

And like the great unwashed out there has any serious understanding of the problem anyway.


6 posted on 08/02/2006 7:17:51 AM PDT by alloysteel (My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling, but it Wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

People generally assess the risk/benefit balance of their actions, whether it is crossing the street or promoting global terrorism.

What do you suppose goes through their minds when they aid and abet killers, when they deliberately lie?

What do they think they are risking, and what do you think they expect for benefits?


7 posted on 08/02/2006 7:24:43 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
The propaganda war from the terrorists began with the first rocket lobbed into Israel – than when that little country hit back the TNNW (Terrorist News New Work) ABCNBCCNNCBS, Reuters and the AP wire screeched “that’s not fair, Israel is using better weapons – make her stop!” or that was the meaning. President Bush and other clear thinking nations said Israel has every right to protect herself – so as Hezbollah began to lose under the surgical strikes, Hezbollah brought fourth several dozen Baghdad Bob’s and the MSM fell neatly into step. It back fired!

(fake pictures)

(numbers still falling)

From Power line...."In its pronouncements on the war, Hezbollah appears to have taken a leaf from Baghdad Bob's public relations book. Today's Haaretz reports that "Hezbollah claims of combat success become less and less believable." Haaretz also carries a long story on yeserday's (raid on Baalbek - a must read). Illustrating the thesis in the Haaretz story on Hezbollah's public relations, Hezbollah claimed the Israeli commandos conducting the raid were trapped inside the hospital in Baalbek. The commandos nevertheless apparently returned to Israel unharmed with five prisoners. The brief Jerusalem Post story on the raid quotes Prime Minister Olmert as saying that "tasty fishes" were among those seized."

(Pajamahideen)

8 posted on 08/02/2006 7:36:15 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

The primary fuel that stokes terrorism is the fact of a big cadre of unemployed, disaffected young men in societies with little opportunity. The smartest thing I have heard said about this was that we need to reduce the "payoff" to these thugs. To wit, if Yassir Aarafat is the father of Arab terrorism, he made out like a bandit. He left billions to his wife after gaining access to the highest reaches of international government circles and notoriety. So, now, here again, the media is creating another international superstar out of a thug. I never heard of Nasrallah before this. Will he get a Nobel prize, too?


9 posted on 08/02/2006 7:40:21 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies


FROM SOMEONE WHO KNOWS--


The press has described me as an unconventional warfare specialist, guerilla fighter, and counter-terrorism expert… among other things. If I worked for your enemy, you’d call me a terrorist.



In The Art of War, one of the fundamental treatises of warfare, Sun Tzu defines victory in psychological terms. Your enemy is defeated when his will is defeated.



Terror is a method of warfare, a psychological method designed to defeat the will of your enemy.



Terrorists very consciously use the media as conduits, as force-multipliers, to strike their real target – the will of their enemy.



Think of it – terrorist acts – killing people by tens and dozens, even hundreds – bringing down a building or derailing a train – these acts have no real military significance – they in themselves do not defeat nations.



Terrorism is theater. When a terrorist sets off a bomb, he’s staging a production, making a video… booms, bangs, smoke, fire, body parts, grief and anger – ready-made dramas for the mass market. These are the terrorists’ real bombs, their weapons of mass destruction….And the press delivers them.



10 posted on 08/02/2006 8:15:50 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Peace Through Victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
There's an old science fiction novel called "Bug Jack Barron", I don't remember the author.

The premise is a TV show ridiculing terrorists and terrorism- openly calling them stupid cowards. Just the opposite of the press today!

In the story, the show p'd off the terrorists to the point where they targeted Jack Barron, the host.

Imagine if NPR or NYT went out of their way to make terrorists look bad? Called them impotent fools with no sense? That seems quite a stretch these days.
11 posted on 08/02/2006 9:01:54 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
I think they are blackmailed and bribed.

IIRC, Jordan Eason (CNN) described how it works in his NYT article after the fall of Baghdad.
12 posted on 08/02/2006 9:02:29 AM PDT by concrete is my business (place, consolidate, finish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green

"And the press delivers them."

Gleefully.


13 posted on 08/02/2006 9:02:46 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Absolutely. It is astonishing that even on sports' blogs, opinion sites where hometown sports is discussed, if one mentions the Times, the Globe, any other lefty MSM outlet, the cries of 'don't touch those sacred cows, you are a Fox viewer, a Rush fan, don't comment on sports from now on,' rings on and on. That so many voters, viewers, bloggers still think of the MSM as fair, objective and right on in objectivity ala AP, is very scary. On both the Right and Left coasts, even sports fans seem brainwashed by the media and cannot see reality without their approval.


14 posted on 08/02/2006 10:13:21 AM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: phillyfanatic

That so many voters, viewers, bloggers still think of the MSM as fair, objective and right on in objectivity ala AP, is very scary.
-----
When you distill it all down, this is basically what keeps the ThugoRats even in existence. Pure voter/citizen IGNORANCE AND APATHY. Once, if, that ever gets fixed, the ThugoRats will be replaced by real conservatives that give a damn about America, and not just socialism and votes.


15 posted on 08/02/2006 10:16:13 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson