Skip to comments.
Senate Votes To Acquire Soledad Cross [San Diego cross that had been ordered torn down]
NBCSanDiego.com ^
| Aug 1, 2006
Posted on 08/01/2006 5:55:42 PM PDT by John Jorsett
SAN DIEGO -- The U.S. Senate voted by unanimous consent Tuesday to acquire a concrete cross in San Diego and the municipal park around it to protect the embattled monument from being taken down.
TOPICS: Front Page News; US: California
KEYWORDS: 109th; aclu; churchandstate; congress; cross; lawsuit; mountsoledad; mtsoledad; sandiego; warmemorial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
The bill now moves to the President for signature
To: John Jorsett
2
posted on
08/01/2006 5:56:19 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(Muslims: masters of dead-child porn)
To: John Jorsett
Note the "unanimously". That's amazing in itself.
3
posted on
08/01/2006 5:56:25 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
To: John Jorsett
4
posted on
08/01/2006 5:57:53 PM PDT
by
livius
To: John Jorsett
Prayers answered - awesome!
5
posted on
08/01/2006 5:58:07 PM PDT
by
MonicaG
(Grateful to our troops & veterans - thank you, thank you; thank you.)
To: John Jorsett
Woooo hooooo!
I wrote both my senators and my congresscritter on this one.
6
posted on
08/01/2006 5:58:32 PM PDT
by
NonLinear
(He's dead, Jim)
To: John Jorsett
7
posted on
08/01/2006 5:58:48 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
To: John Jorsett
Heh, heh. I bet THIS will make the ACLU happy.
8
posted on
08/01/2006 5:59:10 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: John Jorsett
Not really amazing. What it shows is that the Dems follow directions from their handlers, even if they have to hold their noses in doing so.
9
posted on
08/01/2006 6:00:06 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: John Jorsett
I bet there is one judge tonight who is unhappy. How long are we to be troubled by these liberal lawyers and judges??
To: John Jorsett
hehehe....Best thing is "Saving the Cross" and the California Chapter of ACLU, is going to have a real "HISSY FIT" over this....JOY, JOY :D
11
posted on
08/01/2006 6:02:59 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just b/c your paranoid; Doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :)
To: John Jorsett
...not all Dems support that atheist position.....there are actually some Dems....(not Murtha) who fought for and love this country....even though they don't know how to run it....so I give them their due.....that is about it
To: John Jorsett
To: John Jorsett
IMO, the "unanimous" vote was due solely to the upcoming elections. Those clowns in the Senate only care about votes.
To: combat_boots
Thank God it's an election year,otherwise I doubt they would have done anything.
15
posted on
08/01/2006 6:15:47 PM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
To: John Jorsett
To: John Jorsett
So what exactly does this mean? That the ACLU can no longer agitate for it's removal?
17
posted on
08/01/2006 6:23:42 PM PDT
by
swmobuffalo
(The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
To: John Jorsett; Liz; Jay777; weegee; wagglebee; ALOHA RONNIE; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; PsyOps; ...
WOOOHOOOO! THANK YOU VETS!
And...CONGRESS, maybe there is still some American Blood in your veins. But--CONGRESS--you can start to PROVE it by making it so the ACLU can no longer get $900,000.00 in legal fees (as happened in this case!)--for their RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION of the MAJORITY--in a Nation founded to ensure freedom OF religion.
Photo taken at Mt. Soledad War Memorial, May 25, 2006
18
posted on
08/01/2006 6:25:51 PM PDT
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
I dont know who fit the hood on that car, but it needs more work, LOL. Its definitely not a ten pointer.
19
posted on
08/01/2006 6:29:12 PM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: swmobuffalo
So what exactly does this mean? That the ACLU can no longer agitate for it's removal?My guess is that it means that they'll try to continue the fight at the federal level. However, because of prior rulings that's a better battleground than CA state court.
20
posted on
08/01/2006 6:29:32 PM PDT
by
John Jorsett
(scam never sleeps)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
