Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Militant Muslims are the culprits in many of world's current conflicts
Capital Times ^ | 7-25-06 | John Cummuta

Posted on 07/25/2006 5:17:39 PM PDT by SJackson

John Cummuta: Militant Muslims are the culprits in many of world's current conflicts

A letter to the editor Dear Editor: These are the facts:

• On 9/11 we were attacked by militant Islamists.

• But before that, our Marines were attacked in Lebanon by the same Hezbollah that's in the news today, and our embassies were attacked in Africa and the USS Cole was attacked in Yemen, all by militant Muslims.

• Britain, Spain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and other European countries have recently endured Islamist attacks or threats.

• Indonesia, Bali, the Philippines, Australia, and other Asian countries periodically experience Islamist bombings, kidnappings and threats.

• India is experiencing attacks from militant Muslims.

• Russia's problems in Chechnya are mostly with militant Muslims.

• Iraq's hope for democracy is under constant attack from militant Muslims.

• The African continent is seeing one militant Muslim assault after another on non-Muslims.

• Israel is under constant attack from militant Muslims.

• The world is threatened by one of the most militant Muslim regimes (Iran) developing nuclear weapons.

Notice any pattern here? Every one of these globe-spanning outbreaks of death and destruction was initiated by militant Muslims. The non-Muslim world is under assault by Muslims who interpret the Quran to charge them with the responsibility of converting the entire globe to Taliban-like Muslim states by force. They're taking their lead from the Prophet Muhammad's way of growing Islam in the 7th century and the Ottoman Empire's spreading of Islamic domination in the 16th and 17th centuries - both by the sword - not by a peaceful triumph of their belief system over other belief systems.

They are not fighting and hating us because of Israel, or the Iraq war, or our presence in the Mideast. They are against us because we are the world's largest purveyor of freedom. They hate freedom, women's rights, choice, and especially freedom of religion. They believe in Muslim dictatorships like they had in Afghanistan and currently have in Iran.

That's what they want for the United States, and that's the only outcome that will satisfy these extremists - so how could we ever negotiate with them when the only thing they want is our total destruction as a free society and our total submission to them? Since I don't believe the majority of Americans wants to give control of our country to militant Muslims, we have no choice but to fight them. They won't stop if we bring our troops home from abroad. They won't stop until they win - or we win.

We have no choice but to fight them. The only choice we do have is where we fight them: over there - like Iraq and Afghanistan - or here in the U.S. Pick one.

John Cummuta Prairie du Chien

Editor's note: Mr. Cummuta has a right to his views, but we would note that the governments of Iran, Palestine and Lebanon were elected.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: jihad; jihadinamerica; jihadincanada; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: RouxStir

ROFL.


21 posted on 07/25/2006 6:07:40 PM PDT by casino66 (A beater of dead horses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mosquewatch.com; Cindy

Wonder if we could mess with Muslim minds and tell them that thorny Bush their prophesies tell them is a gharqad tree is named Dubya.

other links on the Muslim- particularly the Hamas - aversion to bushes:

http://www.bu.edu/mille/people/steinbergoliver.html


22 posted on 07/25/2006 6:09:27 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
>"Editor's note: Mr. Cummuta has a right to his views, but we would note that the governments of Iran, Palestine and Lebanon were elected."

Ya forgot Iraq (Sadam), Coobah, Venizuala, and Washington State!

Its not how many vote, its who counts the votes-- Unca Joe Stalin mass murderer extrordinaire, friend of the American Pulitzer Prize whinning Press!

23 posted on 07/25/2006 6:14:04 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather be carrying a shotgun with Dick, than riding shotgun with a Kennedyl! *-0(:~{>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"Editor's note: Mr. Cummuta has a right to his views, but we would note that the governments of Iran, Palestine and Lebanon were elected"

Oh, for Pete's Sake! I'm surprised he didn't add in there that they were "fair and square" elections unlike those in the USA where Algore and John F-ing Kerry should REALLY be the ones in charge these days. *Rolleyes*


24 posted on 07/25/2006 7:16:33 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mosquewatch.com

Militants, my eye, they are good Muslims.

I think this needs to be repreated.

And I will add:

STOP BEING DHIMMIS.

25 posted on 07/25/2006 7:22:11 PM PDT by Urbane_Guerilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson