Unbelievable.
1 posted on
07/21/2006 8:47:31 AM PDT by
Akeirook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Akeirook
bad ju-ju for all involved...
2 posted on
07/21/2006 8:48:48 AM PDT by
Hegemony Cricket
(Rugged individualists of the world, unite!)
To: Akeirook
She's a great actress. I wish she and her parents would reconsider.
3 posted on
07/21/2006 8:49:19 AM PDT by
loreldan
(Without coffee I am nothing.)
To: Akeirook
Frankly I can't stand Dakota Fanning.
In War Of The Worlds she was at her insufferable best.
4 posted on
07/21/2006 8:49:19 AM PDT by
angkor
To: Akeirook
Oops, sorry, missed posting the URL in the correct box. Don't see an edit button anywhere around here...
5 posted on
07/21/2006 8:49:29 AM PDT by
Akeirook
To: Akeirook
Ugliness and perversity now constitute the cutting edge of "art." Up is down and square is round.
7 posted on
07/21/2006 8:50:10 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: Akeirook
To: Akeirook
To prevent duplication, please do not alter the heading. Thanks.
To: Akeirook
So will the FBI arrest every studio employee involved in this movie, or will they wait for someone to download it off the internet and then send them to the pokey for 100 years?
10 posted on
07/21/2006 8:50:38 AM PDT by
American_Centurion
(No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
To: Akeirook
Oh, in a few years, they'll have an 8-year-old have sex with an animal, and kill it afterwards.
Gotta keep pushing the envelope! And it's OK, because it's "art".
11 posted on
07/21/2006 8:50:53 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
("He hits me, he cries, he runs to the court and sues me.")
To: Akeirook
To: Akeirook
The screenplay calls for Fanning's character to be raped in one explicit scene and to appear naked or clad only in "underpants" in several other horrifying moments. Maybe not anymore. I just posted this thread: Senate Goes After Hollywood Sex Scenes
13 posted on
07/21/2006 8:52:17 AM PDT by
Drew68
To: Akeirook
Probably going to be directed by Roman Polanski.
14 posted on
07/21/2006 8:52:26 AM PDT by
Thrusher
("...there is no peace without victory.")
To: Akeirook
Dakota is destined for the Betty Ford clinic. Thanks mom and dad. Any sane parent would say "Absolutely NOT!"
15 posted on
07/21/2006 8:53:10 AM PDT by
Huck
(George Allen--the GOP version of Al Gore.)
To: Akeirook
This has got to be illegal.
To: Akeirook
That's Entertainment!...
NOT!
19 posted on
07/21/2006 8:55:33 AM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......The Ca GOP: Where conservatives votes count but their opinions don't.)
To: Akeirook
"Fanning's mother, Joy, and her Hollywood agent, Cindy Osbrink, see the movie, written and directed by Deborah Kampmeier, as a possible Oscar vehicle for the pint-size star."
Isn't this child abuse??? These so-called "adults" are exploiting this child for their own financial gain.
20 posted on
07/21/2006 8:56:28 AM PDT by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: Akeirook
Plot Summary from imdb: "A drama set in the American South, where a precocious, troubled girl (Fanning) finds a safe haven in the music and movement of Elvis Presley."
21 posted on
07/21/2006 8:57:16 AM PDT by
Borges
To: Akeirook
Kampmeier's previous feature called 'Virgin' was about a girl who had no memory of having sex and decided her pregnancy was the child of God.
23 posted on
07/21/2006 8:58:49 AM PDT by
Borges
To: Akeirook
Rape as entertainment and a vehicle to an award. Where do you even begin to list what's wrong here......
24 posted on
07/21/2006 8:59:33 AM PDT by
trimom
To: Akeirook
26 posted on
07/21/2006 9:01:34 AM PDT by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
