[RKBA Democrat]

I hate to rain on anyone's parade here, but how much have the endless lawsuits, legal challenges, and running of a ballot initiative on this issue cost San Diego taxpayers?

I would think that it would be cheaper to simply sell the site to a private party (say the VOFW) and be done with it. Even if the site was sold at a public auction, it would probably have taken less effort to run a fundraising drive than all this. And keep in mind that so long as this is kept in the courts, the opposition isn't being forced to put it's money where it's mouth is.

[a02001]

I think the city tried to do that last year but the boobs on the other side went back to court claiming the city was not acting in good faith. The sale was reversed or canceled.
I agree with you its about money-- The ACLU wanting their pound of flesh from the taxpayers.

[NormsRevenge]

I hate to rain on anyone's parade here, but how much have the endless lawsuits, legal challenges, and running of a ballot initiative on this issue cost San Diego taxpayers?

--


They have cost a lot to be sure but let me toss the inverse back at you.

How much does it cost us if we don't have the parade if you get my drift?

In this case regardless where the case is in the courts, the opposition ought to just keep their mouths shut, they've already done enough harm as is. jmo