Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IL: Liquor trade group challenges Springfield smoking ban
United Pro Smoker's Newsletter ^ | Jun. 29, 2006

Posted on 06/30/2006 3:20:31 AM PDT by SheLion

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. - A trade group that represents liquor retailers is mounting a legal challenge to Springfield's new indoor smoking ban for public places.

The Illinois Licensed Beverage Association filed a lawsuit in Sangamon County Circuit Court Wednesday, seeking an injunction to prevent the ban from taking effect Sept. 17 in all indoor workplaces.

The association has also asked the court to nullify the sections of Springfield's Clean Indoor Air Ordinance that apply to bowling alleys and taverns, saying state law does not give the city the authority to include such establishments in its definition of "public places."

"We have been thinking about this for quite a while," said association executive director Steve Riedl.

The lawsuit contends that enforcement of the ordinance approved in January would cause "irreparable harm" to liquor-selling businesses in the form of lost patron revenue and goodwill.

But Springfield Alderman Bruce Strom, who sponsored the ordinance, dismissed the lawsuit as "frivolous."

"I think everybody who is knowledgeable with the state statute, including the governor and legislative leaders, believe the law does what everyone thinks it is intended to do, and that is to permit cities to regulate smoking in all places of employment," Strom said.

The only exemptions are for retail tobacco stores, nursing home rooms where all residents agree to have smoking, stage productions, hotel rooms, private vehicles and private homes not used for day care or as health facilities.

Under the Illinois Clean Indoor Air Act of 1990, only the 21 home-rule governments that had anti-smoking laws before October 1989 had the right to place greater restrictions on smoking than the state provided. The state requires only that public places have designated smoking and non-smoking areas.

Last summer, Gov. Rod Blagojevich signed a bill granting Springfield and all other home-rule communities the rights the 21 municipalities already had, including the right to ban smoking in bars and bowling alleys.

That bill's sponsor, Sen. John Cullerton, D-Chicago, said that while the original Illinois Clean Indoor Air Act excluded bowling alleys and bars from its definition of public places, that does not mean cities cannot regulate smoking within them.

This week, Blagojevich signed a bill that also gives counties the authority to ban smoking in unincorporated areas. Springfield Mayor Tim Davlin sought that legislation on behalf of city businesses concerned about losing customers to bars outside the city limits that allow smoking.

Sangamon County officials are expected to consider a possible smoking ban later in the summer.

But Riedl said that if the county proceeds with an anti-smoking ordinance similar to the city's, the association might challenge it as well.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: anti; antismokers; augusta; bans; budget; butts; camel; caribou; chicago; cigar; cigarettes; cigarettetax; commerce; epa; fda; governor; individual; interstate; kool; lawmakers; lewiston; liberty; maine; mainesmokers; marlboro; msa; niconazis; osha; pallmall; pipe; portland; prosmoker; pufflist; quitsmoking; regulation; rico; rights; rinos; ryo; sales; senate; smokers; smoking; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco; winston
"I think everybody who is knowledgeable with the state statute, including the governor and legislative leaders, believe the law does what everyone thinks it is intended to do, and that is to permit cities to regulate smoking in all places of employment," Strom said.

What a dweeb!  He talks for EVERYONE?  I think not!

The Illinois Clean Air Act, banning smoking in public and government buildings and on public transportation has been in effect for over 15 years.  This is not an issue about smoking in public buildings....it is about removing the rights of private businesses...restaurants and bars and smoking outdoors.  Why all the BS?  Just drop it!  Most people don't even understand what these intrusive bans are about and it is being implied that everyone smokes everywhere.  That hasn't been the case for a long, long time.  Get real!!!

1 posted on 06/30/2006 3:20:39 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; CSM; ...

2 posted on 06/30/2006 3:21:34 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

They're all for choice, just not your choice...


3 posted on 06/30/2006 4:05:15 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
They're all for choice, just not your choice...

Meeeeeeee????

4 posted on 06/30/2006 4:14:32 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: metesky; SheLion

"They're all for choice, just not your choice..."

You got that right. The kommissar speaks for ALL the people.

I hope they knock this ban back where it deserves to be, in the gutter.

I can't stand these a$$holes anymore.


5 posted on 06/30/2006 8:24:41 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Thanks for the ping!


6 posted on 06/30/2006 8:31:02 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

"


nursing home rooms where all residents agree to have smoking,"




Ridiculous. There is nothing that 100% of people will agree on----nothing. They might as well ban the smoking in the nursing homes instead of this ridiculous solution.



7 posted on 06/30/2006 9:35:21 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Ridiculous. There is nothing that 100% of people will agree on----nothing. They might as well ban the smoking in the nursing homes instead of this ridiculous solution.

I know Mears.  We have read horror story's of senior's in wheel chairs out in the bitter cold at nursing homes trying to have a smoke.  It's despicable!

8 posted on 06/30/2006 11:06:36 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I'm sure all of us,smokers and nonsmokers alike,would agree that a separate room should be set aside in a nursing home for smoking but it is something that could easily be done.

The fact that some states have prohibited this appalls me.


9 posted on 06/30/2006 6:51:47 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mears
I'm sure all of us,smokers and nonsmokers alike,would agree that a separate room should be set aside in a nursing home for smoking but it is something that could easily be done.

The fact that some states have prohibited this appalls me.

Mears, I realize that smoking isn't for everyone but I DO believe in a smoking room or section with a smoke eater, but to totally ban smoking and kick smokers to the curb is inhumane treatment.

Hell, the prisoners at Gitmo are even treated better then the smokers in the states.  The treatment of smokers is despicable!!

10 posted on 06/30/2006 8:55:31 PM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson