Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa

So.. the net 7 billion return in taxes over 10 years isn't worth 1.2BN in up front incentives, eh? - that's why the other 40 upstate counties will never grow financially, or amount to anything much, for that matter.


14 posted on 06/24/2006 6:17:49 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: xcamel
"So.. the net 7 billion return in taxes over 10 years isn't worth 1.2BN in up front incentives, eh? "

But that would only work if we had the fairy-tax./ sarc. slap! sorry...lol
17 posted on 06/24/2006 6:23:58 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Liberals get up every morning and eat a big box of STUPID for breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: xcamel
So.. the net 7 billion return in taxes over 10 years isn't worth 1.2BN in up front incentives, eh? -

If the numbers were true, then they argue that the tax base is too large which is the real problem.

Creating a tax rate that is so high that it makes companies leave then turn around and cut special deals based on projections prepared politicians who cut deals is what we used to call corruption. In fact my Italian ancestors made some tidy profits using this formula.

But to answer your precise question, investing 1.2 billion long-term for a projected 7 billion return over 10 years is a 17% return. Because of all the risks involved, the long-term nature of the investment, the rapdily changing industry they are in, NO. I would advise a client that the minimum projected return should be 25% and therefore the investment in this is too large for its expected return.

20 posted on 06/24/2006 6:28:14 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson