Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors push mandatory health insurance
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 6/14/2006 | Jim Ritter

Posted on 06/14/2006 7:57:57 AM PDT by Mike Bates

Millions of upper-income Americans refuse to buy health insurance because they're young and healthy and figure they don't need it.

But now the American Medical Association wants to force them to buy coverage.

At its annual meeting in Chicago on Tuesday, the nation's largest doctors' group called for mandatory health insurance for anyone who makes more than five times the poverty level. That works out to $49,000 for an individual and $100,000 for a family of four.

No one would go to jail for refusing to buy coverage. The AMA instead suggested using the tax code to force compliance. There would be incentives such as tax credits for people who buy insurance and higher taxes for those who don't.

Of the 46 million uninsured Americans, about 5 million, or 11 percent, make more than five times the poverty level. The AMA said these people burden the health care system when they incur catastrophic medical bills they can't afford to pay. The cost gets passed on to those who largely pay for the health care system: taxpayers, employers and the insured.

"Society should not be penalized by the potential costly medical treatments of those uninsured who can afford to purchase health insurance coverage," an AMA report said.

(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ama; govwatch; healthcare; libertarians; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
Sometimes it's easy to overlook the fact that the AMA, like the NEA and some other "professional organizations," is essentially a union looking for ways to increase demand for their members' services.

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

1 posted on 06/14/2006 7:57:59 AM PDT by Mike Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

It would be better to increase the supply of doctors than to increase the demand for health care.


2 posted on 06/14/2006 7:59:56 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Why should doctors care if rich people pay cash as opposed to through an HMO?


3 posted on 06/14/2006 8:00:00 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Allah is the opium pipedream of a desert pedophile...Freeper Ax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Use the government to force people to buy your product, goods and services.

It is the worst of man in a free society.


4 posted on 06/14/2006 8:00:09 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

"Society should not be penalized by the potential costly medical treatments of those uninsured who can afford to purchase health insurance coverage," an AMA report said.

Just another tax on the middle class working stiff. Nothing to see here, move along folks.


5 posted on 06/14/2006 8:00:31 AM PDT by poobear (The most critical job that Americans will not do (just illegals): Vote for Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: poobear

I'm surprised to see the first few posters supporting passing the costs on to others. So it goes.


7 posted on 06/14/2006 8:02:14 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Why should doctors care if rich people pay cash as opposed to through an HMO?

Maybe it has something to do with people availing themselves of a service for which they're already paying.

8 posted on 06/14/2006 8:02:29 AM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jasoncann
There is a thing called Personal Responsibility.

Not if the 'Rats have their way.

9 posted on 06/14/2006 8:03:35 AM PDT by Mike Bates (Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

Message to AMA: Go Pound Sand!


10 posted on 06/14/2006 8:03:37 AM PDT by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Of the 46 million uninsured Americans, about 5 million, or 11 percent, make more than five times the poverty level. The AMA said these people burden the health care system when they incur catastrophic medical bills they can't afford to pay. The cost gets passed on to those who largely pay for the health care system: taxpayers, employers and the insured.

So.... rich people are the PROBLEM? This is soooo bogus.

11 posted on 06/14/2006 8:03:44 AM PDT by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

 

 

This man has a good reason to smile.

12 posted on 06/14/2006 8:04:27 AM PDT by Fintan (One day we'll look back on this and plow into a parked car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
In the last few days the AMA has shown it's true colors on a few different subjects.

They suck. They are now just another lefty authoritarian organization.

13 posted on 06/14/2006 8:04:58 AM PDT by Protagoras ("A real decision is measured by the fact that you have taken a new action"... Tony Robbins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

The end result of this kind of push is socialized medicine. And the end result of that is low pay for doctors. Physician, heal thyself's own economic illiteracy.


14 posted on 06/14/2006 8:05:29 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates
Maybe it has something to do with people availing themselves of a service for which they're already paying.

I must be missing something-how are they using services they are not paying for? If rich people can afford to pay catastrophic health bills, how is that overburdening health care? Why force them into coverage they really dont need? I wonder how many doctors on this plan invest in HMOs and Group Health?

15 posted on 06/14/2006 8:07:43 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Allah is the opium pipedream of a desert pedophile...Freeper Ax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

The fact of the matter is that one can get medical care, ability to pay or not. That is what will lead to socialized medicine. If those without insurance were denied treatment, or those paying cash had the treatment stopped when the cash ran out, then it wouldn't be necessary.


16 posted on 06/14/2006 8:07:56 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jasoncann

"What is wrong with them lately. They need to stuff it...

There is a thing called Personal Responsibility."

But that is just it -- there is no Personal Responsibility. When those folks require medical treatment, they don't have the insurance to pay up. Then, guess who pays it? The people who do have Personal Responsibility and have medical insurance and pay their bills.

I understand both sides to this -- however, since the hospitals can't practically turn people away that don't medical insurance or money, those costs have to be recuperated some other way -- namely us.


17 posted on 06/14/2006 8:07:58 AM PDT by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates

"Unless we put Medical Freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship . . . to restrict the art of healing to one class of men, and deny equal privilege to others, will be to constitute the Bastille of Medical Sience. All such laws are un-American and despotic and have no place in a Republic ... The Constitution of this Republic should make special privilege for Medical Freedom as well as Religious Freedom."

Benjamin Rush - signer of the Declaration of Independance.


18 posted on 06/14/2006 8:08:18 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Bates; A. Pole

I'm going to push for the passage of a law requiring the purchase of the product my company makes, also. Such laws are not only fashionable, it is, of course, for the 'good' of the consumer...


19 posted on 06/14/2006 8:09:26 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Rugged individualists of the world, unite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
It would be better to increase the supply of doctors than to increase the demand for health care.

Yep, the severe restriction of supply, and government involvement have turned a healthcare market into a healthcare racket.

20 posted on 06/14/2006 8:09:36 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson