Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sir! No Sir! Just saying no (barf alert!)
Chicago Sun Times ^ | 06/09/2006 | Roger Ebert

Posted on 06/10/2006 11:26:50 AM PDT by KeyLargo

Sir! No Sir! Just saying no

Release Date: 2006

Ebert Rating: ***

BY ROGER EBERT / Jun 9, 2006

Quick question: When Jane Fonda was on her "FTA" concert tour during the Vietnam era, who was in her audience? The quick answer from most people would probably be, "anti-war hippies, left-wingers and draft-dodgers." The correct answer would be: American troops on active duty, many of them in uniform.

"Sir! No Sir!" is a documentary that about an almost-forgotten fact of the Vietnam era: Anti-war sentiment among U.S. troops grew into a problem for the Pentagon. The film claims bombing was used toward the end of the war because the military leadership wondered, frankly, if some of their ground troops would obey orders to attack. It's also said there were a few Air Force B-52 crews that refused to bomb North Vietnam. And in San Diego, sailors on an aircraft carrier tried to promote a local vote on whether their ship should be allowed to sail for Vietnam. One of the disenchanted veterans, although he is never mentioned in the film, was John Kerry, who was first decorated for valor, and later became a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War and testified before Congress.

After the turning point of the Tet offensive in 1968, troop morale ebbed lower, the war seemed lost, and a protest movement encompassed active duty troops, coffeehouses near bases in America, underground GI newspapers, and a modern "underground railway" that helped soldiers desert and move to Canada. According to Pentagon figures, there were some 500,000 desertions during the Vietnam years.

The film has been written and directed by David Zeiger, who worked in an anti-war coffee- house near Fort Hood, Texas. In a narration spoken by Troy Garity, the son of Fonda and Tom Hayden, his film says, "The memory has been changed." The GI anti-war movement has disappeared from common knowledge, and a famous factoid from the period claims returning wounded veterans were spit on by "hippies" as they landed at American airports. According to the film, that is an urban legend, publicized in the film "Rambo II: First Blood."

When we reviewed "Sir! No Sir!" on "Ebert & Roeper," we cited the film's questions about the spitting story. There is a book on the subject, The Spitting Image, by Jerry Lembcke, whose research failed to find a single documented instance of such an event occurring in real life. I received many e-mails, however, from those who claimed knowledge of such incidents. The story persists, and true or false is part of a general eagerness to blame our loss in Vietnam to domestic protesters, while ignoring the substantial anti-war sentiment among troops in the field.

Parallels with the war in Iraq are obvious. One big difference is that the Vietnam-era forces were largely supplied by the draft, while our Iraq troops are either career soldiers or National Guard troops, some of them on their second or third tours of duty. The Vietnam-era draft not only generated anti-war sentiment among those of draft age, but supplied the army with soldiers who did not go very cheerfully into uniform. The willingness of today's National Guardsmen to continue in combat is courageous and admirable, but cannot be expected to last indefinitely, and the political cost of returning to the draft system would be incalculable.

A group of recent documentaries has highlighted a conflict between information and "disinformation," that Orwellian term for attempts to rewrite history. The archetype of "Hanoi Jane" has been used to obscure the fact that Fonda appeared before about 60,000 GIs who apparently agreed with her. The Swift Boat Veterans incredibly tried to deny John Kerry's patriotism. The global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" is being attacked by a TV ad campaign, underwritten by energy companies, which extols the benefits of CO2.

No doubt "Sir! No Sir!" will inspire impassioned rebuttals. No doubt it is not an impartial film, not with Fonda's son as its narrator. What cannot be denied is the newsreel footage of uniformed troops in anti-war protests, of Fonda's uniformed audiences at "FTA" concerts, of headlines citing Pentagon concern about troop morale, the "fragging" of officers, the breakdown of discipline, and the unwillingness of increasing numbers of soldiers to fight a war they had started to believe was wrong.

Cast & Credits

A documentary narrated by Troy Garity and featuring Edward Asner, Jane Fonda, Donald Sutherland, Terry Whitmore, Donald Duncan, Howard Levy, Oliver Hirsch, Susan Schnall, Randy Rowland, Louis Font, Dave Cline, Bill Short, Dave Blalock, Greg Payton, Darnell Summers, Michael Wong, Terry Whitmore, Joe Bangert, Richard Boyle, Jerry Lembcke, Terry Iverson, Tom Bernard and Keith Mather.

Balcony Releasing presents a documentary written and directed by David Zeiger. Running time: 85 minutes. No MPAA rating.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 3somequeen; americahaters; americantraitor; americantraitorbitch; anti; bushhaters; commies; ebert; fonda; hag; hanoijane; hollyweird; hollywoodleftists; janefonda; radicalleftists; rogerebert; scumsucker; tobaccojuicetarget; traitor; treason; urinaltarget; vietnam; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last
"The willingness of today's National Guardsmen to continue in combat is courageous and admirable, but cannot be expected to last indefinitely, and the political cost of returning to the draft system would be incalculable."

The MSM and Roger Ebert, lefty and notorious gay-friendly movie reviewer continue to hype anything anti-war or anti-military.

I will be skipping this pile of horse dung, so-called film.

1 posted on 06/10/2006 11:26:51 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

What a wet dream. Any soldier who admired Jane Fonda was a traitor, just like that POS Kerry. they deserved to be lined up and shot.


2 posted on 06/10/2006 11:30:49 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

The article is correct that American military morale declined dramatically towards the end of the war.

Among other things, who wants to be the last soldier to die in a lost war?

There was also a huge drug problem in the military during this period.


3 posted on 06/10/2006 11:33:15 AM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I remember that one of the big 3 abcnbccbs caught an army patrol, on film, in VietNam, near the end, refusing to go down a path. the MSM was calling it mutiny.


4 posted on 06/10/2006 11:34:34 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Cancerbutt has gone off the deep end. That's all there is to it.

He's stopped reviewing movies and devolved into a mere huckster; and like so many other Libs lately, he is willfully squandering what little good will he had built up over the years.

I wonder how his sponsors will feel about it.

5 posted on 06/10/2006 11:36:57 AM PDT by StAnDeliver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Are any of these troops at the Fonda gatherings like the 'troops' that John Kerry brought along on his anti-war whistle stops?


6 posted on 06/10/2006 11:37:07 AM PDT by ChuckShick (He's clerking for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Ask Roger Fatbert why are enlistment levels surpassing expectations. I stopped reading his reviews. He was at U of Va
hosting a film series. I remeber him saying that european voters were much more sophisticated than americans. After that I avoided his reviews. It was at that time when Siskel was ill
and Michael Medeved appeared on Chicago radio... a breath of fresh air.

I found Michael Medeved's reviews to be more insightful and
agreeable.


7 posted on 06/10/2006 11:38:13 AM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

this guy's supposed to be a film critic? yet he doesn't know that the line concerning civilians spitting on soldiers is to be found near the end of "First Blood" - the FIRST Rambo movie (the actual title of the second movie is "Rambo: First Blood PART TWO")?

As this guy doesn't even know the subject of his own field of specialty, why the hell should anyone heed his other assertions of "fact"?

For the record, the spitting-on-soldiers story was well established in my youth in the 1970's, to the point that I recall "sensitive" hippie types BRAGGING that they had DONE this.


8 posted on 06/10/2006 11:39:45 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
"After the turning point of the Tet offensive in 1968"

I was there for the Tet offensive and witnessed what a disaster it was for the North -- as verified after the war by Gen. Giap. Of course, the traitorous Cronkite reported it all as a major U.S. loss and, effectively, and simultaneously, started the serious growth of the American anti-war movement and convinced the North, which was very close to suing for peace before the Cronkite reports, that they could, in fact, win with the help of America's "enemies from within." (again verified by their Gen. Giap)

The American left can and will happily lead us to defeat at every opportunity. They hate this country and all it stands for every bit as much as do the Islamo-fascists.
9 posted on 06/10/2006 11:40:10 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

"The Swift Boat Veterans incredibly tried to deny John Kerry's patriotism."

Ebert: liberal leftist.

Your honor, I rest my case.


10 posted on 06/10/2006 11:42:36 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Rog, your side won that war. Get over it.


11 posted on 06/10/2006 11:43:08 AM PDT by RichInOC (Jane Fonda likes it long and hard. Just ask the Vietnamese Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

"The Swift Boat Veterans incredibly tried to deny John Kerry's patriotism."
Typical Lefty misrepresentation. The SBV rightfully questioned his veracity about his own conduct, and his accusations against US troops. And there wasn't anything "incredible" in doing so.


12 posted on 06/10/2006 11:43:46 AM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

Keep that Kerry propaganda were it belongs, in the dust bin of history.

"The last man to die for a mistake" is a classic Kerry post-vietnam quote. The Vietnam war was WON by 1968, Kerry and Fonda, with the collusion of foreign intelligence and communist spies, turned victory into defeat by convincing the US we couldn't win the war, that it was a mistake.

It wasn't a mistake to the estimated 2 million southeast Asians who died in communist purges after the US left.


13 posted on 06/10/2006 11:46:57 AM PDT by wvobiwan (If you're not part of the solution, you're obviously a liberal Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
"The willingness of today's National Guardsmen to continue in combat is courageous and admirable, but cannot be expected to last indefinitely, and the political cost of returning to the draft system would be incalculable."

That's not an untrue statement, though. And the long-term effects on recruitment are evident, as many people who would have signed up as only a Home Guard (without overseas deployment except following military attack by another nation) no longer have a place to enlist.

If we are going to be an active participant in overseas nation-building/interventionism, then we need a larger active-duty regular military, not the current alignment of National Guardsmen for offensive combat. Besides, the current regulations have limits on redeployment of Guardsmen, such that we are having to dig deeply into inactive reservists, like the 70-year-old sent to Afghanistan in 2004.

14 posted on 06/10/2006 11:47:48 AM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now wants to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

He gave the Gore movie 4 stars. Nuff said.


15 posted on 06/10/2006 11:47:56 AM PDT by altura (Bushbot No. 1 - get in line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette
Tet of 69 was just as devastating for the North as Tet 68.

What nobody knew at the time, was, the north was a biscuit short of suing for peace during nixon's Linbacker II (1972 Christmas Bombing), when all we wanted was to get 'em back to the peace table...which it did.

not sure what this guy is smokin....
16 posted on 06/10/2006 11:50:17 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo; All
“Is chow allowed in the barracks, Private Ebert?”

“Sir! No Sir!”

“Are you allowed to eat jelly doughnuts, Private Ebert?”

“Sir! No Sir!”

“And why not, Private Ebert?”

“Sir, because I’m too heavy, Sir.”

“Because you are a disgusting fatbody, Private Ebert!”

17 posted on 06/10/2006 12:02:07 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
I'd have to ask some of our folks that were there for clarification, but could it be that was because:
1) Drafted soldiers didn't want to be there?
2) The media was in their heyday in that they were able to provide losing scenarios continuously, with no counter?
3) The druggies prevalent in our society were drafted, thus carried their own problems with them as they deployed?
4) (Sorry) Jane Fonda was then considered hot?
18 posted on 06/10/2006 12:03:37 PM PDT by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
The willingness of today's National Guardsmen to continue in combat is courageous and admirable, but cannot be expected to last indefinitely

Not if Fatso has anything to say about it.

19 posted on 06/10/2006 12:06:35 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Private Ebert, you climb obstacles like old people bump ugly!
You're too slow!
You're too fricking slow!
Get off of my obstacle! Get the HECK off of my obstacle!
Get your goll darned bubble gummed body the furp off of my obstacle!
20 posted on 06/10/2006 12:06:53 PM PDT by tongue-tied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

What BS. How do I know? Ebert wrote it..


21 posted on 06/10/2006 12:07:14 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Allah is the opium pipedream of a desert pedophile...Freeper Ax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
featuring Edward Asner, Jane Fonda, Donald Sutherland

Boy, there's three winners. I can't wait to see that film.

22 posted on 06/10/2006 12:12:08 PM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette
Vietnam is just like this war, ONLY IN THAT the Patriotism and support of the war and warriors is most of America. They are the folks sitting in their homes supporting the war and the troops, and getting on with their day to day lives. While the media and libs are falling all over themselves with rhetoric and stupidity.

The liberals are being led around like cows to the slaughter house, and they are happy to oblige.

23 posted on 06/10/2006 12:15:57 PM PDT by WellsFargo94 (graduation = freedom from liberal hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

See my about page


24 posted on 06/10/2006 12:16:10 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Hollywood and the MSM bring us another "unbiased" and "factual" documentary like Fahrenheit 911? Gee - I'm surprised!

I'll go see this right after I watch TransAmerica, Syriana and Broke Back Mountain, all movies critics rave over.
25 posted on 06/10/2006 12:17:47 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6
I'll go see this right after I watch TransAmerica, Syriana and Broke Back Mountain, all movies critics rave over.

All three of which bombed at the box office. But hey, its all about the critical acclaim, not the money..

26 posted on 06/10/2006 12:19:39 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Allah is the opium pipedream of a desert pedophile...Freeper Ax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied

Haveing worked with a number in country VN Vets from all walks of life. I never found one for jane fonda. So I would say NO!

It's just how Libs justify themselves. Twist reality to fit.

1 I’m never wrong
2 If I’m wrong see #1

Or

I reject your reality and substitute my own.


27 posted on 06/10/2006 12:19:43 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
It's also said there were a few Air Force B-52 crews that refused to bomb North Vietnam.

Analyzed by Marshall Michel in his book The Eleven Days of Christmas, and proven not true. There were a few guys who went DNIF for questionable reasons, but they were fewer in number or percentage of aircrew that did so during the great bomber slaughter over Germany in 1943.

And in San Diego, sailors on an aircraft carrier tried to promote a local vote on whether their ship should be allowed to sail for Vietnam.

I was in San Diego for that: they were confused young men with some disciplinary action pending against them who got played for idiots by the local antiwar activists.

28 posted on 06/10/2006 12:21:25 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

I heard a joke to the effect that Hollyweird, in its effort to completely alienate itself from Middle America, is making the movie "Brokeback Jarhead."


29 posted on 06/10/2006 12:22:22 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
If we are going to be an active participant in overseas nation-building/interventionism, then we need a larger active-duty regular military, not the current alignment of National Guardsmen for offensive combat.

I've heard this kind of statement from some people on both the left and right. But it's not a widely held view -- thank goodness.

There are plenty of good reasons -- both political and military -- why the Army National Guard and other reserve forces will continue their current role.

30 posted on 06/10/2006 12:26:10 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
The article is correct that American military morale declined dramatically towards the end of the war.

That carried over through the 70's.

31 posted on 06/10/2006 12:29:27 PM PDT by cowboyway (My heroes have always been cowboys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
It's also said there were a few Air Force B-52 crews that refused to bomb North Vietnam.

I think the situation was that they flew the same flight plan at the same time every night and the North Vietnamese were shooting down more and more planes. They objected to not having any flexibility. The pilots won and no missions were canceled... from what I have read.

32 posted on 06/10/2006 12:31:09 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
"Tet of 69 was just as devastating for the North as Tet 68."

I agree. I returned for my 2nd tour there just in time for Tet 69 which, while another major loss for the North, was much less significant because, after seeing what happened the year before, they kept a lot more of their powder dry.

It is clear, however, that America's leftists successfully snatched defeat from the jaws of victory -- and were (and are) PROUD of their betrayal of America.
33 posted on 06/10/2006 12:39:35 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Welcome Home!!


34 posted on 06/10/2006 12:45:11 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied

"I'd have to ask some of our folks that were there for clarification, but could it be that was because:
1) Drafted soldiers didn't want to be there?
2) The media was in their heyday in that they were able to provide losing scenarios continuously, with no counter?
3) The druggies prevalent in our society were drafted, thus carried their own problems with them as they deployed?
4) (Sorry) Jane Fonda was then considered hot?"


You are right on, throw in the military race riots and there is no denying the military was in much turmoil.



35 posted on 06/10/2006 1:02:02 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tongue-tied
Jane Fonda was then considered hot

Having recently seen her in an early movie, Barefoot in the Park, I am forced to agree.

36 posted on 06/10/2006 1:15:42 PM PDT by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

My wife is conservative, yet is more moderate than I.

She rented a musical some days ago called "Rent".

Disgusted she turned it off. In summary - AIDS, drugs, inter racial relationships, homosexual relationships, casual sex innuendoes and and and. She could not take it and just turned it off 2/3 of the way through. It was one giant liberal orgy of a musical. That’s the way the critic should have described it – “For the consummate liberal, this orgy of decadence is a true delight to watch.”

Add “Rent” to the list with “BrokeBack”, “Fahrenheit 911”, “TransAmerica” and other great Hollywood productions.

I would rather play a computer game than subject myself to this "trash" they pump out. The only movies I watch anymore tend to be with my daughter. Ice Age II was very good BTW. It's not even a deliberate boycott, but I don't waste my time or money on nonsense like Fahrenheit 911.


37 posted on 06/10/2006 1:25:46 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

My older brother was in Vietnam at the time with the 101st Airborne. He told me that shortly after the enemy was crushed after Tet, he and thousands of other troops were stationed near the dmz waiting for the orders to invade the north that never came.


38 posted on 06/10/2006 1:49:18 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: altura
"four stars"

I quit taking Ebert seriously as a movie reviewer long before his leftist inclinations were revealed. He's given great reviews to so many god awful movies (that I unfortunately paid good money to see), I gave him the deep six many years ago.

39 posted on 06/10/2006 1:52:08 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Roger Ebert eats ----.


40 posted on 06/10/2006 1:53:45 PM PDT by MrCruncher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Ebert decided some years ago to join the political Hollyweird crowd.


41 posted on 06/10/2006 3:00:30 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wuli; cardinal4

Ebert was pushing that lunatic Gore in 2000. Like I'm going to pay any attention to ANYTHING he has to say?


42 posted on 06/10/2006 3:14:48 PM PDT by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wvobiwan

"It wasn't a mistake to the estimated 2 million southeast Asians who died in communist purges after the US left."

The figure I heard for South Vietnamese murdered after the Communist takeover was about 300,000. Where do you get 2 million?



43 posted on 06/10/2006 7:03:34 PM PDT by brant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

It isn't exactly like he has a lot left to lose:

"Roger Ebert to Have More Cancer Surgery
Thursday June 1 11:48 AM ET


Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic Roger Ebert, who has battled cancer in recent years, will undergo cancer surgery again, according to a published report.

In Thursday's Chicago Sun-Times, where Ebert has been the movie critic for nearly 40 years, columnist Robert Feder reported that Ebert will have surgery June 16 to remove a cancerous growth on his salivary gland.

"It's not life threatening, and I expect to make a full recovery," the 63-year-old critic and host of the nationally syndicated movie review show, "Ebert & Roeper," told Feder. "I'll continue to function as a film critic during this time."

ADVERTISEMENT



Yes No
Yes No

Yes No




Ebert has undergone cancer surgery three times before once in 2002 to remove a malignant tumor on his thyroid gland and twice on his salivary gland the next year.

But Feder reported that Ebert is not expected to require radiation treatment as he did when he underwent the previous procedures.

"This is known as a slow-growing and persistent cancer," Ebert said. "You live with it."

Ebert recently returned from the Cannes Film Festival in France. He said he plans to tape enough shows with Sun-Times columnist Richard Roeper that the program will continue to air during his recovery.

Ebert has been a film critic at the Chicago Sun-Times since 1967. He won the Pulitzer Prize for criticism in 1975, the same year he teamed up with Gene Siskel of the rival Chicago Tribune to launch their movie-review show. Siskel died in 1999."


44 posted on 06/10/2006 8:17:19 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
I am reading Case Closed, Gerald Posner's brilliant skewering of JFK conspiracy mongers again. What Posner makes clear is that the conspiracy mongers are not just in error but are consciously deceptive and dishonest, and more importantly, so are the mainstream media and liberal establishment that have let them peddle their hogwash for decades without any real critical analysis because the message being peddled, that America is run by a secret fascist cabal, is a culturally destructive message that is useful to them, and truth has no relevance. Here is Ebert's review of Oliver Stone's hallucinogenic film JFK. He gives it four stars and also puts it on his "Great Movies list." Here is the opening of his "Great Movies" remarks on JFK:
"I don't have the slightest idea whether Oliver Stone knows who killed President John F. Kennedy. I have no opinion on the factual accuracy of his 1991 film ``JFK.'' I don't think that's the point."
Indeed it's not. I am struck while reading this by the hypocrisy of the left that whines about "McCarthyism" because it allegedly unfairly accused people of disloyalty but blithely support decades of knowingly false accusations of treason and murder conspiracy in the JFK case.
45 posted on 06/11/2006 12:00:25 AM PDT by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brant
The figure I heard for South Vietnamese murdered after the Communist takeover was about 300,000. Where do you get 2 million?

Ever hear of a place called "Cambodia"? Well, it's in Southeast Asia. And a few people died there too, I hear.

46 posted on 06/11/2006 12:24:49 AM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
If we are going to be an active participant in overseas nation-building/interventionism, then we need a larger active-duty regular military, not the current alignment of National Guardsmen for offensive combat. Besides, the current regulations have limits on redeployment of Guardsmen, such that we are having to dig deeply into inactive reservists, like the 70-year-old sent to Afghanistan in 2004.

Yeah...yeah! In fact, what we need is a sixth service, one that just focuses on cleanup operations after the rest of the military beats the crap out of the organized opposition.


47 posted on 06/11/2006 12:55:29 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Bill, McQueeg and the President related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar

"Boy, there's three winners. I can't wait to see that film."

No kidding, how did Tim Robbins, Alec Baldwin, and Sean Penn miss out on cameos in that one?


48 posted on 06/11/2006 12:58:23 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Bill, McQueeg and the President related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red6

ROFLMAO! Every time I think of that movie I think of the lampooning they did of that crappy show in Team America, World Police--second time on this thread that movie relates, and I SWEAR I am not hijacking it! They did a faux-musical called "Lease," and sang this song right at the start of the movie (every bit as subtle as Rent):

Everyone has AIDS!
AIDS AIDS AIDS!
AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS!
Everyone has AIDS!

And so this is the end of our story
And everyone is dead from AIDS
It took from me my best friend
My only true pal
My only bright star (he died of AIDS)

Well I'm gonna march on Washington
Lead the fight and charge the brigades
There's a hero inside of all of us
I'll make them see everyone has AIDS

My father (AIDS!)
My sister (AIDS!)
My uncle and my cousin and her best friend (AIDS AIDS AIDS!)
The gays and the straights
And the white and the spades

Everyone has AIDS!
My grandma and my dog 'Ol Blue (AIDS AIDS AIDS)
The pope has got it and so do you (AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS)
C'mon everybody we got quilting to do (AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS AIDS)
We gotta break down these barricades, everyone has
AIDS!


49 posted on 06/11/2006 1:01:47 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Bill, McQueeg and the President related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Red6

Rent is a hugely popular Broadway show. A modern day rethinking of La Boheme. It's not surprising that there was a movie made from it.


50 posted on 06/11/2006 7:51:48 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson