Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spanish-American War Tax To End
National Center for Policy Analysis ^ | 05/30/06 | Editorial

Posted on 05/30/2006 1:16:34 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

ADIOS TO A PHONE TAX

The Spanish-American War was fought in 1898 and lasted less than eight months, but Americans still pay an excise tax on phone service that was imposed to finance it. Last week, a mere 108 years after the end of that conflict, the Bush Administration moved to terminate the levy, says the Wall Street Journal.

Treasury Secretary John Snow said the Internal Revenue Service will no longer collect the 3 percent federal excise tax on long-distance phone calls and will offer refunds for the past three years. The courts have forced its hand with repeated rulings that the tax on long-distance is illegal in a telecom world in which calls are no longer priced based on distance. The IRS will continue to collect the tax on local calls, but Snow did express support for the idea of Congress passing legislation to repeal the tax entirely.

According to the Journal:

* That would be the best outcome, and not just because a future administration might opt to begin collecting the tax again and restart the court battles. So long as the tax exists, so will the political temptation to expand its scope and turn it into yet another revenue stream for the federal till. A Joint Tax Committee report issued last year suggested extending the excise tax to "all data communication services," including cable modems, cellular and DSL Internet connections.

* The federal excise tax was intended to target "the rich," who at the time were the only ones who could afford a telephone. Yet our tax code still considers phones "luxury" items. The last time Congress came close to ending this charade was 2000, when majorities in both the House and the Senate voted for repeal, which President Clinton vetoed, says the Journal.

Source: Editorial, "Adios to a Phone Tax," Wall Street Journal, May 30, 2006.

For text (subscription required):

For more on Taxes:


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: spanishamericanwar; taxes

1 posted on 05/30/2006 1:16:35 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

".....when majorities in both the House and the Senate voted for repeal, which President Clinton vetoed, says the Journal...."


2 posted on 05/30/2006 1:20:36 PM PDT by conservativehusker (GO BIG RED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
a mere 108 years after the end of that conflict, the Bush Administration moved to terminate the levy,

Headline: Bush refuses to fund war!

3 posted on 05/30/2006 1:21:28 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Compare:

Spanish-American War Tax To End

and

The IRS will continue to collect the tax on local calls,

It's getting smaller - not ending. And we still have the Gore Tax on the bills.

4 posted on 05/30/2006 1:25:28 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Never ask a Kennedy if he'll have another drink. It's nobody's business how much he's had already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The income tax has been around, in one form or another, since 1862 - when it was created to aid the Civil War effort. In that sense, maybe we could call it the Civil War tax. Certainly it predates the Spanish American War tax; perhaps we might therefore repeal that, too. It's become a monster which gobbles up the substance of American citizens and thrives on sucking the life blood from the population, all the while promoting corruption in a bloated Washington. Someone (I think it was Thomas Jefferson, but don't rely on an Old Man's memory) once said "The power to tax is the power to destroy," and that's undoubtedly true. It's long past time for government to figure out a more honest manner in which to sustain itself.


5 posted on 05/30/2006 1:28:50 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

It's a quagmire, I tell you!


6 posted on 05/30/2006 1:29:26 PM PDT by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mikeybaby
It's a quagmire, I tell you!


7 posted on 05/30/2006 1:32:19 PM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Even with the repeal of this tax, the total fees and taxes on my phone bill still approachs a rate of 40%.

It is only a matter of time before one's DSL/Cable Internet service is subject to similar taxation. Already there are proposals in Congress to provide broadband Internet access to "underserved" areas and guess who will foot the bill so that the 16 people with 2 computers in West Waterpump, SD have broadband access...the rest of us "rich" folks who have the "luxury" of broadband access.

8 posted on 05/30/2006 1:37:56 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Even with the repeal of this tax, the total fees and taxes on my phone bill still approachs a rate of 40%.

I switched my long distance, 2 years ago,to an international company. I prepay on line as I go - I get no bill - there are no taxes,no fees, no 'program' charges, no time restrictions, nada.

Just call anytime, 24/7 and it's 4 1/2 cents a minute, period, even to call my daughter in Canada. It has saved me hundreds

9 posted on 05/30/2006 1:45:17 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I predict we will get some meaningful tax reforms in a couple more centuries.


10 posted on 05/30/2006 1:46:50 PM PDT by TexasRepublic (Afghan protest - "Death to Dog Washers!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
I'm wishing they would keep the tax and instead divert the money to build a border fence - exclusively. I'm betting such an expenditure would be well received, by the masses at least.

If it's okay with Mexico, that is. (sigh)

11 posted on 05/30/2006 1:48:24 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
I switched my long distance, 2 years ago,to an international company.

And the name of the comapny is?

12 posted on 05/30/2006 2:07:56 PM PDT by capydick (Not to know is bad; not to wish to know is worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Did they even have phones in 1898?


13 posted on 05/30/2006 2:07:58 PM PDT by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capydick
And the name of the comapny is?

Goldline ;o)

14 posted on 05/30/2006 2:49:50 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: diverteach
Did they even have phones in 1898?

By 1881, there were 132,700 Bell telephones - so, 17 years later - lots more. (over 15 million by 1930 - Google knows everything...:O)

15 posted on 05/30/2006 2:57:15 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Lincoln: "...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mikeybaby

Remember the Maine!


16 posted on 05/30/2006 3:05:59 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson