Skip to comments.
Iraqi Ayatollah America's Annihilation and the Muslim Conquest of the World
MEMRI ^
| 5-21-06
Posted on 05/21/2006 9:38:14 AM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: SJackson
"Why shouldn't an Islamic or Arab country have a nuclear bomb?" This article is bogus. Even this nitwit must know that Pakistan has nukes.
21
posted on
05/21/2006 12:40:16 PM PDT
by
trek
To: SJackson
Mecca and Medina have alrady been programmed in.
Semper Fi'
Jarhead
22
posted on
05/21/2006 12:44:30 PM PDT
by
Buffettfan
(VIVA LA MIGRA! - LONG LIVE THE MINUTEMEN!)
To: betsyross1776
"But in America itself, if you ask the current president to list the states - he doesn't know them. In America, there is hunger, poverty, and disease in certain states, but not in others. That is one thing. That quote is from the Iranian nutburger. Read the article before posting. You owe an apology.
23
posted on
05/21/2006 1:14:15 PM PDT
by
metalurgist
(Believe in my God or I will kill you! The cry of all religious extremists.)
To: SJackson
Why shouldn't an Islamic or Arab country have a nuclear bomb?Cause y'all is crazy!
To: SJackson
There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah' will be triumphant over the domes of Moscow, Washington, and Paris."What of Peking and Calcutta? The above-mentioned targets are "people of the book." The Chinese and the Hindus don't even merit that minimal level of consideration.
To: SJackson
So, is this guy going to try and unseat Howard Dean as the Chairman of the Democrat Party? Why else would he do the "Murtha" and spew all this idiocy?
To: MikefromOhio
He's a Saddam relative. Isn't Saddam's family the al-Tikritis?
27
posted on
05/21/2006 10:04:30 PM PDT
by
Allegra
(My Tagline is Humblegunner Approved)
To: MikefromOhio
I think this guy's jealous of all the attention al-Sadr gets. He's trying to sound even loonier than Mookie (and doing a pretty good job of it..)
They both need to assume room temperature.
28
posted on
05/21/2006 10:10:08 PM PDT
by
Allegra
(My Tagline is Humblegunner Approved)
To: betsyross1776
Um, I was referring to the Ayatollah, not W.
29
posted on
05/22/2006 11:53:51 AM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
To: Allegra
Al-Tikriti is the name of the town he is from.
Like I would be Mike of-Springfield.
the important name is the middle hame...
Saddams name was Saddam Al-Husseini Al-Tikriti - literally meaning Saddam of Hussein of Tikrit.
I'm sure I've made an error somewhere, but that's the jist of it.
30
posted on
05/22/2006 3:08:48 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq - Woohoo!! I'm on A List!!! yay!!!!)
To: Allegra
They both need to assume room temperature.
For sure.....
31
posted on
05/22/2006 3:09:48 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq - Woohoo!! I'm on A List!!! yay!!!!)
To: Buffettfan
Why IN THE HELL would we nuke Mecca OR Medina when the problem is a guy in Iraq?
That doesn't make any LOGICAL sense.
32
posted on
05/22/2006 3:10:52 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq - Woohoo!! I'm on A List!!! yay!!!!)
To: cripplecreek
33
posted on
05/22/2006 3:22:13 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(I will go down with this ship, and I won't put my hands up in surrender.)
To: MikefromOhio
Yeah, I saw some weird documentary aabout Saddam that was being passed around a few months ago. It said that everyone from Tikrit had had the surname al-Tikriti but that it got confusing so Saddam made them revert back to their original surnmaes. The name still shows up, though.
I've also been told by the Iraqis that people named Hussein (sometimes spelled in other ways like Hussain) are almost always Shiite and that Saddam is a big exception to that.
So this al-Baghdadi guy (the name denoting his being from Baghdad) may well be a relative of Saddam's. Hussein is a pretty popular name here. (You never, ever hear the name Saddam, though. I've been told that anybody who had that name has since changed it.)
34
posted on
05/22/2006 9:52:10 PM PDT
by
Allegra
(My Tagline is Humblegunner Approved)
To: SJackson; Cindy
35
posted on
08/12/2014 4:03:37 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks SJackson.
...there are jurisprudents, both Sunnis and Twelver Shi'ites, who have said that the presence of the Infallible is not a prerequisite. If the objective and subjective circumstances materialize, and there are soldiers, weapons, and money - even if this means using biological, chemical, and bacterial weapons - we will conquer the world,,,
36
posted on
08/16/2014 5:37:49 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson