Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA Senate Votes to Force All CA Public Schools To Promote Homo-, Trans-, Bi- Education
CRI ^ | 5/11/06 | Karen England

Posted on 05/11/2006 12:10:28 PM PDT by BurbankKarl

The California State Senate today passed SB 1437 (Kuel, D-Los Angeles), the most outrageous bill in the California legislature this year.

“This is just another example of how radical the State Senate has become,” said Karen England, Executive Director of Capitol Resource Institute.

“SB 1437 seeks to indoctrinate innocent children caught in the tug-of-war between traditional families and the outrageous homosexual agenda.”

SB 1437 requires textbooks to highlight the so- called positive contributions of homosexual and transgender individuals to society and would prevent textbooks, teaching materials, instruction, and “school- sponsored activities” from reflecting adversely upon persons based on their sexual orientation or actual or perceived gender.

“The State Senate is so far out of touch with California families that it is beyond alarming,” said England. “The traditional family is under attack and this is a latest—and most outrageous—attempt to corrupt the minds of our children.”

SB 1437 not only affects textbooks and instructional materials for kindergarten and grades 1-12, it also affects all school-sponsored activities.

The full effects of SB 1437 are broad and sweeping.

“Under SB 1437 school districts would also likely have to do away with dress codes and would have to accommodate transsexuals on girl-specific or boy- specific sports teams.”

“It is shameful that the same day parents are suing because many children are not prepared to pass a basic exit exam, the State Senate is preoccupied with promoting homosexual and transgender history in our schools,” stated England. “It is also shameful that the California Teacher’s Association is supporting this radical agenda when they should be focused on preparing our students in the fundamentals.”

CRI is committed to opposing legislation that uses our children as social-experiments and tramples upon long-standing traditional family values.

More on SB 1437

What Does “Gender” Mean?

CRI stated that SB 1437 will result in public schools being forced to accommodate transgender children on opposite-sex sports teams and that school textbooks would have to be revised to eliminate references to “mom and dad,” “husband,” “wife,” or other notions of a traditional family unit.

The reason these scenarios are real possibilities is because schools would be prohibited from casting any negative light on “actual or perceived” gender or sexual orientation.

Gender is defined, under California law, to include either the gender the pupil was born as or the gender the pupil perceives him/herself as (i.e., “actual or perceived gender”).

When SB 1437 prohibits discrimination based on gender, this doesn’t simply mean that girls and boys have to be given the same amount of homework. Because of the definition of gender, stated in the bill, public schools will have to accommodate transgender students and treat this behavior as normal and acceptable. Public schools will also have to encourage other students to do the same, regardless of their personal religious convictions or the convictions of their parents.

SB 1437 goes beyond dealing with “violence prevention” and “student safety.” It actively seeks to transform thoughts and attitudes of students to fully embrace transsexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.

What Will Happen if SB 1437 Becomes Law?

Just to give you an idea of how completely outrageous this bill really is, here is a quote from a proponent of SB 1437.

Aejaie Sellers, executive director of the Billy DeFrank LGBT Center in Santa Clara told the San Jose Mercury News that she thinks SB 1437 – requiring gay and lesbian history lessons for students – is fantastic idea.

"Gays throughout history should be recognized, Who knows that the author of 'America the Beautiful,' Katharine Lee Bates, was gay?"

What will happen in history class if SB 1437 becomes law? Our children will be told that many historical figures allegedly had sex with persons of the same sex and that this is okay, regardless of what your parents or religious beliefs tell you.

And, what if it’s not conclusively proven that a certain historical figure was a practicing homosexual – will this be inferred? Will our school children be told, based on scanty information, that U.S. President Abraham Lincoln was homosexual?

“Not only has U.S. history been watered down and disregarded in our public schools, but now the precious little classroom time that is actually devoted to U.S. history will be spent teaching children that this or that historical figure slept with someone of the same sex and that is okay,” said Karen England of Capitol Resource Institute.

“The author of SB 1437, Senator Kuhel, has declared that she wants ‘open discussions’ about homosexuality in the classroom,” said England. “It is time for parents and taxpayers across California to stand up and denounce the hijacking of our public schools by extreme political activists.”

“Our children deserve to be educated. The indoctrination needs to stop now!”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: caglbt; california; callegislation; homosexualagenda; kuehl; perverts; radicalleft; sb1437
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
No wonder they can't pass 8th grade math in CA!
1 posted on 05/11/2006 12:10:30 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Will Ahnold veto it? Or is he too much of a "girlie man"?


2 posted on 05/11/2006 12:12:01 PM PDT by Antoninus (I will not vote for a liberal, regardless of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

another day, another reason to home school...


3 posted on 05/11/2006 12:13:37 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Separation of school and state BUMP!


4 posted on 05/11/2006 12:14:48 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

To liberals, feelings trump everything.


5 posted on 05/11/2006 12:15:01 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
The bill it anyone wants to read it. It's short. SB 1437
6 posted on 05/11/2006 12:15:34 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
The inmates are running the insane asylum. Assuming it gets through the Assembly, hopefully Arnold will veto this obscene bill.
7 posted on 05/11/2006 12:15:37 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

All public schools must be immediately abolished.

Parents will then have to enroll and pay for the private education of their kids.

The only way one will value something in life is if they earn it.


8 posted on 05/11/2006 12:17:06 PM PDT by senorjosef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
Children need to learn what goes on in the bedroom per government fiat. I always thought what is private remained private. Not in California.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less

9 posted on 05/11/2006 12:17:07 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal

If he doesn't then he's a big a phony as that wrestler gov of Minnesota...


10 posted on 05/11/2006 12:18:00 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

What? No Pedos?..........


11 posted on 05/11/2006 12:18:31 PM PDT by Red Badger (In warfare there are no constant conditions. --- The Art of War by SunTzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Senator Kuehl poses with fellow members of the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) Caucus.

12 posted on 05/11/2006 12:19:38 PM PDT by BurbankKarl (Queer as Folk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
That's my question.
13 posted on 05/11/2006 12:20:25 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (**DemocRATs- the CULTURE OF TREASON!**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
and what's next ?
requires textbooks to highlight the so- called positive contributions of fill in the blank 

14 posted on 05/11/2006 12:21:04 PM PDT by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Will Ahnold veto it? Or is he too much of a "girlie man"?

He'll veto it this time because he's facing reelection, but look for another identical bill next year that he will sign. You can bet the rent money on it.

15 posted on 05/11/2006 12:21:55 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Homo-fascism.


16 posted on 05/11/2006 12:22:19 PM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

WA State, the bastard stepchild of CA, will be doing it next especially with Gov Fraudoire in charge.


17 posted on 05/11/2006 12:24:00 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

You might be a Kookyfornian IF: Your Senator poses with fellow members of the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) Caucus.


18 posted on 05/11/2006 12:24:33 PM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Just how good does the weather have to be to keep families with kids in that ridiculous state?


All you Kalifornians, get your priorities straight.


19 posted on 05/11/2006 12:25:30 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (This space for hire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

too bad Reagan wasn't able to deliver on his 1980 campaign promise to abolish the Dept of Education...
I would have traded that for the amnesty for illegals. LOL


20 posted on 05/11/2006 12:26:30 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots. Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson