Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of President Bush remarks on NSA Telephone Traffic Analysis
President Bush ^ | 2006.5.11 | WhiteHouse

Posted on 05/11/2006 11:32:37 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter

THE PRESIDENT: After September the 11th, I vowed to the American people that our government would do everything within the law to protect them against another terrorist attack. As part of this effort, I authorized the National Security Agency to intercept the international communications of people with known links to al Qaeda and related terrorist organizations. In other words, if al Qaeda or their associates are making calls into the United States or out of the United States, we want to know what they're saying.

Today there are new claims about other ways we are tracking down al Qaeda to prevent attacks on America. I want to make some important points about what the government is doing and what the government is not doing.

First, our international activities strictly target al Qaeda and their known affiliates. Al Qaeda is our enemy, and we want to know their plans. Second, the government does not listen to domestic phone calls without court approval. Third, the intelligence activities I authorized are lawful and have been briefed to appropriate members of Congress, both Republican and Democrat. Fourth, the privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities.

We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans. Our efforts are focused on links to al Qaeda and their known affiliates. So far we've been very successful in preventing another attack on our soil.

As a general matter, every time sensitive intelligence is leaked, it hurts our ability to defeat this enemy. Our most important job is to protect the American people from another attack, and we will do so within the laws of our country.

Thank you.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: callrecords; echelon; nationalsecurity; nsa; spying; survailance; trollhere; warrants; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Phase I Traffic Analysis:
Scan the billion transaction dataBase for certain patterns.
No warrants required.

Phase II Targeted Surveillance :
When suspect(s) are identified, obtain a warrant if required.

"Fewer than 10 U.S. citizens or residents a year, according to an authoritative account, have aroused enough suspicion during warrantless eavesdropping to justify interception of their domestic calls, as well. That step still requires a warrant from a federal judge, for which the government must supply evidence of probable cause."

In other words work, domestic to domestic calls that are listened to are listened to with a warrant.

1 posted on 05/11/2006 11:32:39 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Sounds like it was a good plan. If we don't know what domestic to domestic calls to get a warrant on, how do we get a warrant?

Technically, phone lines are not our property anyway.


2 posted on 05/11/2006 11:36:15 AM PDT by mnehring (Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Democrats are not conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Atigun; bannedfromdu; Beckwith; ...

fyi


3 posted on 05/11/2006 11:36:47 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: TeleStraightShooter

I have zero doubt that if these programs had been in place in 2000 and early 2001 that 9/11 would not have happened. The patterns of phone calls coming from Germany and Yemen would have been discovered and warrants gotten for calls to and from Mohamed Atta. The two hijackers who the CIA knew about but lost after they entered the US would probably have been found.


5 posted on 05/11/2006 11:38:21 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Where Do I Sign?
I, for one, am perfectly comfortable with corporate monitoring of my private activity and reporting it back to the federal government.

I'm not. Having said that, this type of activity, in this context, seems reasonable.

6 posted on 05/11/2006 11:40:00 AM PDT by Paradox (Removing all Doubt since 1998!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Where Do I Sign?

Oh, and Welcome to FreeRepublic.


7 posted on 05/11/2006 11:41:55 AM PDT by Paradox (Removing all Doubt since 1998!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter
I authorized the National Security Agency to intercept the international communications...

International communications is the key term. IMHO anyone making an international call with any expectation of privacy is an idiot. When I make an international call, I expect that someone might be listening in, and I don't see how it matters if it's US or someone else.

8 posted on 05/11/2006 11:42:53 AM PDT by magslinger (When you take my gun from me, mind the barrel. It will be hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter
Is this like ABLE DANGER?

You gotta like the speed in which the President came out in front of this one. Snow or Bolten?
9 posted on 05/11/2006 11:43:03 AM PDT by Blue State Insurgent (Shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter the remnants to the wind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Where Do I Sign?

Using their property and equipment to conduct your activity means it is NOT your "private activity". You are acting in public since you are doing it on THEIR property. Trying to claim you have a right to privacy while using THEIR property is foolish.


10 posted on 05/11/2006 11:43:07 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Yes, I AM Conservative. The Political Center is for the uninformed and cowardly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Where Do I Sign?
Where Do I Sign? Since May 11, 2006

Nice Try Democrat Underground. So are you a new troll or one of the usual DU fools who comes around regulary to make wholly ignorant, nonsensical comments thinking they are "clever"?

11 posted on 05/11/2006 11:45:37 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Yes, I AM Conservative. The Political Center is for the uninformed and cowardly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter
Third, the intelligence activities I authorized are lawful and have been briefed to appropriate members of Congress, both Republican and Democrat.

So what's the problem? Of course the Congressional idiots wil be all over the talk shows this weekend, attacking the President and General Hayden, basing all their accusations on an article in the McPaper USA Today.

12 posted on 05/11/2006 11:45:44 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Where Do I Sign?
Yeah, sure.... go ahead and send in your own name.

BTW, the article says nothing about corporate monitoring and reporting back to the feds.

13 posted on 05/11/2006 11:47:43 AM PDT by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blue State Insurgent
I do believe so, as ABLE DANGER was run off of publicly available information.
14 posted on 05/11/2006 11:47:44 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Paradox
Where Do I Sign? Oh, and Welcome to FreeRepublic.

Well that was quick. It seems to be a pile of smoking ash smelling strongly of ozone now.

16 posted on 05/11/2006 11:52:39 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Yes, I AM Conservative. The Political Center is for the uninformed and cowardly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter

Bookmarked


17 posted on 05/11/2006 11:53:25 AM PDT by AmeriBrit (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, IT INCLUDES TERRORIST SLEEPER CELLS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

18 posted on 05/11/2006 11:53:28 AM PDT by magslinger (When you take my gun from me, mind the barrel. It will be hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

They're not even clever, nor funny. No entertainment value to them.


19 posted on 05/11/2006 11:54:23 AM PDT by Paradox (Removing all Doubt since 1998!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

Great pict. Mind if I steal it?


20 posted on 05/11/2006 11:56:02 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Yes, I AM Conservative. The Political Center is for the uninformed and cowardly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson