To: NormsRevenge
As if they needed a Stern warning.
To: NormsRevenge
3 posted on
05/02/2006 10:15:56 AM PDT by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: NormsRevenge
That sound you hear is Mel Karmazin's reputation going down the toilet.
5 posted on
05/02/2006 10:18:22 AM PDT by
jpl
To: NormsRevenge
I dont need to pay for radio. it is free. I will put up with a few commercials if I have to...
...and I stopped listening to Stern when he fired Jackie and got all full of himself over his movie.
He is old hat.
6 posted on
05/02/2006 10:26:03 AM PDT by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: NormsRevenge
Stern is so "90's" (yawn).
8 posted on
05/02/2006 10:31:27 AM PDT by
llevrok
(Take me to your blender !)
To: NormsRevenge
I've said it before and I'll say it again: that mega contract they handed Stern is going to put Sirius out of business. It's a shame too, as an XM subscriber, I see it as competition exiting the market. That's never a good thing.
9 posted on
05/02/2006 10:33:13 AM PDT by
NJ_gent
(Modernman should not have been banned.)
To: NormsRevenge
It's a one-time stock payment.
The fact that their costs per new subscriber fell 41 percent might be why the stock is rising again.
The jury's still out on whether the Stern deal is a winner or not.
10 posted on
05/02/2006 10:34:35 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: NormsRevenge
11 posted on
05/02/2006 10:35:03 AM PDT by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: NormsRevenge
Sirius reported a net loss of $458.5 million, or 33 cents a share, for the January-March period compared with a loss of $193.6 million, or 15 cents a share, a year ago. It must be cool having people give you a fortune and all you have to do to is lose 1/2 billion dollars. Seems somebody could do just as well with no business degree and no experience at all! :-)
13 posted on
05/02/2006 10:42:40 AM PDT by
HitmanLV
("5 Minute Penalty for #40, Ann Theresa Calvello!" - RIP 1929-2006)
To: NormsRevenge
They lose a little on every sale, but they make it up on volume.
17 posted on
05/02/2006 10:48:24 AM PDT by
stevem
To: NormsRevenge
Sounds "series". I hope their losses continue to be "hugh".
19 posted on
05/02/2006 10:52:35 AM PDT by
dc-zoo
To: NormsRevenge
This reminds me of the nineties and the dot-coms. Do whatever it takes to get market share - damn the costs. Once you have the market you can focus on profitability.
The problem is just when you have established the market and are ready to squeeze your customers to make your profit the competition squeezes you.
If you have to buy your market at such a high price, is it really worth having. Capital always has to be spent, don't get me wrong, but maintaining profitability should always come first. The best businesses focus on providing a good service or product for profit. If your product or service is good the market will follow.
In my opinion these companies are overpaying for content.
To: NormsRevenge
Hughes and Anthony Cumia, who now work for XM. CBS Radio had fired them in 2002 after they aired a live account of people having sex in St. Patrick's Cathedral. Since they haven't changed their act, why are they being welcomed back? < /rhetorical question>
25 posted on
05/02/2006 12:31:26 PM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson