Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Founder of Minutemen targets run for president
WND ^ | 1 May 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 04/30/2006 7:22:13 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

Jim Gilchrist, the founder of the Minuteman Project, is considering a run for president in 2008 with the Constitution Party.

Gilchrist has just returned from Florida where he met with the Constitution Party's national committee.

Party Chairman James Clymer told WorldNetDaily the party was excited about the possibility of Gilchrist as its marquis candidate.

"Yes, indeed we are interested," Clymer told WND. "Gilchrist spoke to us last weekend in Tampa and our people asked Jim then if he would be the candidate. We think it would be wonderful if Jim Gilchrist would seriously consider being our presidential candidate."

Gilchrist told WND the only candidate he would support as the Republican Party presidential nominee in 2008 was Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo.

"If John McCain enters the race for president," Gilchrist said. "I will definitely run. John McCain should have forfeited his right to run for President on the Republican Party the moment he put his name on immigration legislation with Sen. Ted Kennedy."

Gilchrist and the Constitution Party both agree on the need to secure our southern border with Mexico. Commenting on the street demonstrations planned on May 1, Gilchrist said they are nothing more than "a declaration that we are no longer a nation governed by the rule of law, but that we are being ruled by mob rule."

Asked whether he felt President Bush's "guest worker" program or the administration's "pathway to citizenship" were reasonable compromises, Gilchrist reacted sharply: "The Republican Party is going to pay a huge price for pandering to what they think is going to be an illegal-alien vote and for their reckless disregard for the rule of law. The Republican Party has sold out our sovereignty."

Gilchrist told WND that he thought his third party candidacy could be viable, noting "the country is ready for a third party candidate, just like the country was ready for Ross Perot in 1996."

Gilchrist was harshly critical of Bush's leadership on the immigration issue.

"The president should resign," Gilchrist asserted. "The Congress should begin impeachment proceedings if President Bush will not resign. President Bush has shown he is incompetent to handle his job. It amounts to dereliction of duty that President Bush has left our border with Mexico wide open while supposedly he is fighting a war on terror."

Asked if he thought the recent arrests by the Department of Homeland Security cracking down on companies who hire illegal aliens was affective, Gilchrist dismissed the administration's efforts.

"It's nothing more than a show," Gilchrist argued. "DHS just served up another 'photo op.'"

"The political fix is on," Gilchrist warned. "The president thinks he has a compromise that the Republican leadership and the Democratic leadership can ram through Congress, but it's going to end up being jammed down the throats of the 300 million people the president is supposed to be preserving, protecting, and defending."

Gilchrist dismissed President Bush's attempt to get "comprehensive immigration reform" passed by Congress before the August recess. "Any law the Bush administration supports," Gilchrist predicted, "will be just like all the other immigration laws – a sellout. The administration plans to forget about the enforcement parts as soon as President Bush can shake hands with Ted Kennedy, right after he signs the law into effect. It's all a wink-wink game the Republicans have started playing with the Democrats. Both parties are really just the same, neither party wants to secure or border with Mexico."

How about "guest workers"?

"The 'guest worker' program, or whatever the PR guys at the White House decide to call it," Gilchrist answered, "will be nothing more than an amnesty. We're going to wave the magic wand and 30 million illegal aliens will somehow become citizens, despite the fact that they march under the Mexican flag and make up their own national anthem in Spanish. Pretty soon there will be 50 million illegal aliens here. Who knows? As far as George Bush and Sen. Ted Kennedy are concerned, the more the merrier."

The Constitution Party supported Gilchrist in 2005, when he ran as an independent for Congress after Randy Cunningham, R-Calif., resigned. At that time, Clymer put out a strong statement supporting Gilchrist's candidacy. According to Dec. 15 party press release:

Jim Clymer, Chairman of the Constitution Party, believes that a major change is in order. Both the House and the Senate have been thoroughly corrupted by influence-peddling for decades, Clymer said. But the solution is not to run the Democrats to power or to elect a more ethical Republican majority. The solution is to jettison the two major parties altogether and to start afresh with principle-based leadership.

In 1992, Howard Philips left the Republican Party to found the U.S. Taxpayers Party and ran as the party's presidential candidate. In 1995, the party became the fifth political party to be recognized by the Federal Election Commission as a national political party. In 1999, the party changed its name to the Constitution Party.

During the Nixon administration, Philips headed two federal agencies, serving last as the Director of the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity.

In 2005, Gilchrist ran for the House seat of California Republican Chris Cox when Cox resigned to become chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Committee. Gilchrist received 25.5 percent of the vote in the general election, losing to Republican John Campbell.

A third-party candidate could represent a viable challenge to the Democrats in 2008.

A recent Rasmussen poll indicated disillusionment over President Bush's immigration policy could lead to a tie, with 31 percent of voters going for the Democratic Party presidential candidate, 31 percent going for a third party independent arguing to build a wall on the border, and 21 percent for the Republican candidate.

Gilchrist, a Marine veteran with 13-months combat experience in Vietnam, presents himself in an unassuming fashion.

"I'm just an average Joe citizen," Gilchrist told WND. "What we've proved is that an average Joe citizen can come out of nowhere and not only create the Minuteman Project, but can also run for president. I want to bring common sense and rule of law back into our national dialogue."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; aliens; borderlist; constitutionparty; corsi; cp; cp4hillary; cphearthillary; cpluvzhillary; dejavu92; fringe; gilchrist2008; hillary2008; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; jimgilchrist; minutemanproject; minutemen; president; tancredo; thirdparty; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-303 next last
To: unixfox
And the difference would be....

Abortion, tax cuts, gun control,and don't forget Iraq. For starters.

Foolish foolish post.

61 posted on 04/30/2006 8:04:23 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chena
Gilchrist can only win if the majority of citizens who vote care only about the illegal immigration issue. One issue does not represent the country as a whole, nor the silent majority of commonnsense folks.

If Gilchrist isn't an internationalist, he would represent the commonsense folks on several other issues on that alone.

62 posted on 04/30/2006 8:05:45 PM PDT by Junior_G
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: decal
LOL!

I'd hate to be a Tancredo staffer in the morning...this is going to frost Tom's flakes.

63 posted on 04/30/2006 8:05:49 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

They cannot even get on the ballot in every state like here in Oklahoma. Some of these people on here don't bother to read what else they stand for -- why do that? Better to keep trashing Republicans.


64 posted on 04/30/2006 8:06:02 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Elect Bob Sullivan OK Governor -- Throw out Dem Gov DoLittle Henry in 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Just goes to show what he real intentions are and probably always have been.

I suspect he wants nothing else than to ensure a Democrat victory in 2008.

He knows that immigration is not an issue that will ever get someone elected. It will only draw just enough votes to make sure on January 20, 2009 we are inaugurating President Hillary Clinton.

65 posted on 04/30/2006 8:06:56 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Amen. No excuse to flimsy.


66 posted on 04/30/2006 8:07:00 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

As you can plainly see from my last post, I think there are still significant differences between the current GOP and the Dems.

That said, I agree that GWB is forgeting his base and consequences for health of the party are dire. GWB is not cut from the same cloth as most conservative posters to this forum as he never worked for his money. He will gladly give away other people's money so that he can appear and feel compassionate. In this way, he is really quite liberal.


67 posted on 04/30/2006 8:07:13 PM PDT by right neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Abortion, tax cuts, gun control,and don't forget Iraq. For starters. Foolish foolish post.

I agree. I prefer to look at the big picture while some folks can only handle their one, or two "pet" issues.

68 posted on 04/30/2006 8:07:25 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; All

I have a question, how long has the Constitution Party has been around???


69 posted on 04/30/2006 8:07:41 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Not necessarily. Both parties are badly underestimationg the frustration with a do nothing Congress. The vast majority of people in the US are sick to death of both parties ignoring the growing problem of illegal immigration. Four of the most populus states have the biggest problem with illegal aliens; California, Texas, Florida, and New York. They could go to an anti-illegal immigration candidate.


70 posted on 04/30/2006 8:07:58 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chena
Gilchrist can only win if the majority of citizens who vote care only about the illegal immigration issue.

He can only win if 99.7% of the electorate stays home. And even then, he'd probably still lose.

The fact that some FReepers are entertaining the idea of victory shows them to be more fringe than one might typically believe.
71 posted on 04/30/2006 8:08:04 PM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
I wonder what his real political background is?

What is his financial situation...independently weathly? No outside income from any sources?

72 posted on 04/30/2006 8:08:18 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I'm sure most of his money is coming from the dupes that he has conned into sending him large amount of $$$.


73 posted on 04/30/2006 8:09:17 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

As you can plainly see from my last post, I think there are still significant differences between the current GOP and the Dems.

That said, I agree that GWB is forgeting his base and consequences for health of the party are dire. GWB is not cut from the same cloth as most conservative posters to this forum as he never worked for his money. He will gladly give away other people's money so that he can appear and feel compassionate. In this way, he is really quite liberal.


74 posted on 04/30/2006 8:09:40 PM PDT by right neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: right neck
"GWB is not cut from the same cloth as most conservative posters to this forum as he never worked for his money."

Have you forgotten his successful business career?

75 posted on 04/30/2006 8:09:44 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
He can only win if 99.7% of the electorate stays home. And even then, he'd probably still lose. The fact that some FReepers are entertaining the idea of victory shows them to be more fringe than one might typically believe.

From rugs, to bedspreads, to dresses, I have always found "fringe" to be nothing but annoying. ;)

76 posted on 04/30/2006 8:10:16 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Well, I believe we need another party that can stand up to the other two. It shouldn't mostly be always a dem or rep getting elected. I they realize that there are others who may take their jobs then maybe (but I doubt it) they will do their damn job.

Why would someone spend a fortune to get a job that pays less for the entire duration of the job than it costs to get the job?


77 posted on 04/30/2006 8:11:26 PM PDT by rfreedom4u (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right neck

As you can plainly see from my last post, I think there are still significant differences between the current GOP and the Dems.

That said, I agree that GWB is forgeting his base and consequences for health of the party are dire. GWB is not cut from the same cloth as most conservative posters to this forum as he never worked for his money. He will gladly give away other people's money so that he can appear and feel compassionate. In this way, he is really quite liberal.

-

I must I suppose confess I'm more libertarian than "conservative" in the traditional sense, perhaps making me something of a minority here - but there are some issues which just seem so abundantly clear, and on which GWB seems just so abundantly out to lunch, that one can only stand mouth open staring, wondering "what in the world is he thinking".

I really like Bush. But I am so disappointed sometimes.


78 posted on 04/30/2006 8:11:47 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
"OK folks, keep those campaign donations coming in."

Yeah right. I just set the Minutemen $125.00 to build a fence. Was I suckered?

79 posted on 04/30/2006 8:11:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
Yeah right. I just set the Minutemen $125.00 to build a fence. Was I suckered?

Only if the fence stands alone amongst miles and miles of open border.

80 posted on 04/30/2006 8:13:52 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson