Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report Raises New Questions on Bush, WMDs
Las Vegas Sun & AP ^ | April 12, 2006 | Nedra Pickler

Posted on 04/12/2006 2:27:54 PM PDT by YaYa123

The White House faced new questions Wednesday about President Bush's contention three years ago that weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq.

The Washington Post reported that a Pentagon-sponsored team of experts determined in May 2003 that two small trailers were not used to make biological weapons. Yet two days after the team sent its findings to Washington in a classified report, Bush declared just the opposite.

"We have found the weapons of mass destruction," Bush said in an interview with a Polish TV station. "We found biological laboratories."

Bush spokesman Scott McClellan said Wednesday that Bush was relying on information from the Central Intelligence Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency when he said the trailers seized after the 2003 invasion were mobile biological laboratories. That information was later discredited by the Iraq Survey Group in its 2004 report.

(Excerpt) Read more at lasvegassun.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; falselyaccused; mobilelabs; thelyingpress; trailers; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Look for CNN's David Insor to be fired. I just heard him explain the "new questions" raised by the Washington Post and ABC are unfair and misleading. He said raw intelligence data never gets to the White House in two days, that when President Bush made his statement, he was legitimately and accurately referring to other intelligence that supported him.

Insor also cited the inconclusiveness of that raw data, and cited how months afterward, George Tenent and UN David Kay still thought the labs were used to make WMD.

1 posted on 04/12/2006 2:27:56 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

thats what i was going to say, can they prove Bush read the report that was only sent 2 days prior.


2 posted on 04/12/2006 2:31:21 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Why is anyone at CNN providing context? That's too much like real reporting.


3 posted on 04/12/2006 2:31:34 PM PDT by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
The Media is all upset because Bush actually had the gall to put the US defense ahead of the UN (something even his father hadn't done).

We had every right to invade Iraq once they violated the treaty agreements.

We did not have to prove that WMD existed, Sadaam had to prove that they did not.

He didn't, so we had every right to remove him from power.

4 posted on 04/12/2006 2:32:35 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Insor's a goner for sure.
5 posted on 04/12/2006 2:32:39 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

NOT ANOTHER REPORT ON MADE UP WMD STUFF????!?!?!?!??!


6 posted on 04/12/2006 2:33:12 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Politicians are in it for themselves, to get reelected, to benefit them, not we the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

This has already been debunked and everybody got it except Nedra Picklepuss


7 posted on 04/12/2006 2:33:50 PM PDT by capt. norm (W.C. Fields: "Hollywood is the gold cap on a tooth that should have been pulled out years ago.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

The new rule in Washington is that if you repeat something provided to you by your top people responsible for knowing that information, you are lying.

If the attorney general tells you something is legal and you do it..only to have it questioned later... you INTENTIONALLY broke the law...regardless of the answer to the latter question.


8 posted on 04/12/2006 2:35:30 PM PDT by Paloma_55 (Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
"trailers were "impractical for biological agent production," lacking 11 components that would be crucial for making bioweapons. Instead, the trailers were "almost certainly designed and built for the generation of hydrogen," the survey group reported.
The group's report and members of the technical team also dismissed the notion that the trailers could be easily modified to produce weapons."

A little critical reading shows the inconsistencies with the title compared to fact. No where does it state that the trailers was impossible to be used to make Bio weapons just that it lacked 11 components and the word "easily" is very subjective.
9 posted on 04/12/2006 2:36:05 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123; All

And now this Iraqi document destroys the lies of liberal and their media reagrding Iraq WMD and President Bush.
This document below will not only back up the President side but it will destroy all the lies of liberals and their media regarding Saddam Regime WMD issue.
September 1998 Document: Secret Research Programs Related to WMD http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1613509/posts

This is yet another document that proves without any doubt that Saddam Regime never stopped working in his WMD programs and Research and they were just waiting for the opportune moment to produce these WMD again on a large scale. Also please remember that in September 1998 the UN inspectors were still in Iraq and they were kicked later on that year after some US air and missile strikes. So most definitely these Secret Research Programs related to WMD were still in existence and may have reached a more advanced stage from late 1998 to late 2002 where during this period of time there were no UN inspectors in Iraq. This document is another proof that we could have never trusted Saddam and that we had all the right to remove his brutal and terrorist regime after 9/11/2001.

This document will be the antidote to the Washington Post latest LIE that there were no biological programs and it is a very powerful proof against all the lies spewed by liberals and their media for the last three years.


10 posted on 04/12/2006 2:36:19 PM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Doesn't matter....

BUSH LIED!! MILLIONS MORE DIED!!

< /Hysterical Left >

11 posted on 04/12/2006 2:38:41 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (A nickel bag gets sold in the park. I WANT IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Why was that female nicknamed Dr. Anthrax going all the way back to the 90s?
12 posted on 04/12/2006 2:38:44 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Nedra Pickler needs to be told about Freeper jveritas' translations, which prove their were WMD. Never mind. She probably knows about them but chooses to ignore them.


13 posted on 04/12/2006 2:49:53 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
Report Raises New Questions on Bush, WMDs

I see AP still practices obfuscation with their headlines.

14 posted on 04/12/2006 2:49:55 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: jveritas

LOL--I was about to post a link to that translation, glad I read a little further down. How anyone can say we shouldn't have gone into Iraq after all you've found, is beyond me. Don't think for a minute the folks in the MSM don't know about these--they're just hoping they won't have to report on them.


16 posted on 04/12/2006 3:31:36 PM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123


WP+ABC=PURE PROPAGANDA


17 posted on 04/12/2006 3:39:34 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

I just found out it was ABC's White House reporter Martha Raddish who wrongly accused the president, and she did it on the ABC Morning Show. If I had the stomach, I should watch ABCNews tonight to see if she corrects herself.


18 posted on 04/12/2006 3:57:11 PM PDT by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: YaYa123
Insor also cited the inconclusiveness of that raw data, and cited how months afterward, George Tenent and UN David Kay still thought the labs were used to make WMD.

I still can't figure out how a country whose major business is oil production, which should have the capacity to produce plenty of hydrogen gas as a by-product, would use "mobile fermentation labs" to produce hydrogen for weather baloons (which is supposedly what the experts concluded these units were for). I remember as a grad student, getting a microbiology minor along with my biochemistry Ph.D., trying to cultivate hydrogen generating microbes in the lab - It would have been much easier to buy a tank of hydrogen which is so very portable and convenient.

20 posted on 04/12/2006 4:52:56 PM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson