Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/11/2006 3:09:02 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: PatrickHenry

prime ping?

;^)


2 posted on 04/11/2006 3:10:58 PM PDT by AntiGuv (The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
"But the important role played by the number 42 has recently persuaded even the deepest skeptics that the subatomic world might hold the key to one of the greatest unsolved problems in mathematics."

Paging Douglas Addams

3 posted on 04/11/2006 3:11:53 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
role played by the number 42 has recently persuaded

No Way!!! This is hilarious, the ultimate answer! God Bless Douglas Adams.
4 posted on 04/11/2006 3:15:26 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Mathematics is not science?

Who told you that?

5 posted on 04/11/2006 3:15:48 PM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Humans are remarkable. We have the ability to view nature in a way that is very abstract and very often correct.

More than just random chance (IMHO).


6 posted on 04/11/2006 3:17:19 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

And of course, everyone knows the Primes went on to become the Temptations.


7 posted on 04/11/2006 3:17:59 PM PDT by stylin19a (I never put my foot in my mouth...I shoot that sucker off long before it gets anywhere near my mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
42
9 posted on 04/11/2006 3:18:33 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (The MSM is a hate group and we are the object of their disdain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

There exists a simple, algebraic proof to fermat - I just don't have room for it in this post...


10 posted on 04/11/2006 3:19:14 PM PDT by patton (Once you steal a firetruck, there's really not much else you can do except go for a joyride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I understand that quantum mechanics can also cook a mean omelet.


12 posted on 04/11/2006 3:22:19 PM PDT by stacytec (Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

bump


13 posted on 04/11/2006 3:23:06 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Illegals:”The Road to Serfdom” for the nation via Elites & Elect importing “better” serf’s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I read it.
I reread it.
And I couldn't help thinking..."this article is about Prime Numbers, and they're talking about the number 42".
Which isn't a prime number.
I suppose it's the product of the first three primes.
Certainly the article could have added a little but more that air of hocus-pocus mystery (without, however, saying anything), by adding that detail, with a suitably raised editorial eyebrow of course.


14 posted on 04/11/2006 3:23:40 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Does this mean we don't need Deep Thought, or does it mean we do?


23 posted on 04/11/2006 3:34:12 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42... 4 8 15 16 23 42...


25 posted on 04/11/2006 3:35:34 PM PDT by Fudd (If at first you don't succeed, remove all evidence of your attempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

"What is so deep about this number 19?" Louis Farrakhan



31 posted on 04/11/2006 3:40:59 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mitchell

ping


32 posted on 04/11/2006 3:41:35 PM PDT by Allan (*-O)):~{>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Okay, when did 42 become a prime number?


39 posted on 04/11/2006 3:49:12 PM PDT by Doohickey (Democrats are nothing without a constituency of victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
It would mean that the primes behave rather like the random molecules of gas in a room: Although you might not know quite where each molecule is, you can be sure that there won't be a vacuum at one corner and a concentration of molecules at the other.

The frequency with which some part of a room will suddenly exhibit a substantial vacuum is - disturbingly - real and calculable. I believe it is many times the age of the universe for most examples, but it is something crazy to consider no less.

42 posted on 04/11/2006 3:52:41 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Why do I have the feeling there must be some kind of Fatwa against this?


45 posted on 04/11/2006 3:54:45 PM PDT by colorado tanker (We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
I am somewhat surprised that the fact that it is indeed possible to generate the primes from a set of diophantine equations doesn't get more play:

Another approach might be to ask if there is a non-constant polynomial all of whose positive values (as the variables range in the set of non-negative integers) are all primes. Matijasevic showed this was possible in 1971 [Matijasevic71], and in 1976 Jones, Sato, Wada and Wiens gave the following explicit example of such a polynomial with 26 variables (and degree 25).

(k+2){1 – [wz+h+jq]2 – [(gk+2g+k+1)(h+j)+hz]2 – [2n+p+q+ze]2 – [16(k+1)3(k+2)(n+1)2+1–f2]2 – [e3(e+2)(a+1)2+1–o2]2 – [(a2–1)y2+1–x2]2 – [16r2y4(a2–1)+1–u2]2 – [((a+u2(u2a))2 –1)(n+4dy)2 + 1 – (x+cu)2]2 – [n+l+vy]2 – [(a2–1)l2+1–m2]2 – [ai+k+1–li]2 – [p+l(an–1)+b(2an+2an2–2n–2)–m]2 – [q+y(ap–1)+s(2ap+2ap2–2p–2)–x]2 – [z+pl(ap)+t(2app2–1)–pm]2}

(From the web page http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/page.php/MatijasevicPoly.html . You can find them broken out here at MathWorld.)

52 posted on 04/11/2006 3:57:41 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe something to do with harmonics?


61 posted on 04/11/2006 4:01:33 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson