Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration debate needs common sense
townhall ^ | Mar 31, 2006 | Tony Snow

Posted on 03/30/2006 10:44:15 PM PST by ncountylee

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Illegal immigration seems to have spawned a dreary debate about the merits of Mexicans, when it should be drawing attention instead to a very different matter: how to build on the luster and wonder of the American dream.

Immigration is not the pox neo-Know Nothings make it out to be. Begin with the astounding influx of illegal immigrants, the vast majority of whom hail from Mexico. While the population includes an eye-popping number of crooks, drug-dealers and would-be welfare sponges, it also provides a helpful prop for sustaining American economic growth and cultural dynamism.

Princeton University sociologist Douglas S. Massey reports that 62 percent of illegal immigrants pay income taxes (via withholding) and 66 percent contribute to Social Security. Forbes magazine notes that Mexican illegals aren't clogging up the social-services system: only 5 percent receive food stamps or unemployment assistance; 10 percent send kids to public schools.

On the work front, Hispanic unemployment has tumbled to 5.5 percent, only slightly above the national average of 4.7 percent and considerably lower than the black unemployment rate of 9.3 percent. Economist Larry Kudlow praises Hispanic entrepreneurship: "According to 2002 Census Bureau data, Hispanics are opening businesses at a rate three times faster than the national average. In addition, there were almost 1.6 million Hispanic-owned businesses generating $222 billion in revenue in 2002."

Skeptics counter that immigrants have clogged our hospitals, which is true -- but primarily in places that offer lavish benefits to illegal immigrants.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Tony Snow is the Republican Joe Conason. Both are nothing more than apologists and spin artists for their respective parties.


41 posted on 03/31/2006 2:10:21 AM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All
... in my opinion, we are already in WWIV ( WWIII being the Cold War ) and there are two, somewhat interlocking elements to it:

Islam, a Religion of Peace®? ( links, blogs, quips, quotes, aggravating pictures ) is located here- click the Pic, and scroll backwards:

"Thunder on the Border," click the picture:


42 posted on 03/31/2006 2:24:38 AM PST by backhoe ("Keep Your Powder Dry!" hattip: Minutegal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Tony, here's a little suggestion for you: TAKE DOWN THE BORDERS!

If the few (~10 to 20 miilion depending on who you believe) illegal immigrants are so beneficial to our country, imagine the contributions of ~100-150 million more!

We could:
1. Abolish the Immigration Service.
2. Pay more for medical treatments (and probably book them much further in advance.
3. Residents of the United States would become the best educated people on earth. Judging from the number of foreign born students who populate the Academic Achievement Awards.
4. The prices for our fresh produce would drop dramatically as the competition between those willing workers (who only will take those jobs that no Americans want) would probably eliminate the cost of labor.
5. Companies would not have to bribe (pay) the pimps of the election industry (Members of Congress) to legislate amnesty and benefits for those who are law breakers from other countries.
6. The U.S. Government would save money by not having to extradite anyone.
7. This also would be a boom for the flag making industry (no doubt overseas) as many flags of other nations would replace the outdated Stars and Stripes!
8. The pimps of the election industry, in the Congress and the Main Stream Media could focus their efforts on other aspects of the politics of FEAR, DIVISION, and HATRED!
43 posted on 03/31/2006 3:02:37 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes
Yes, Tony Snow has indeed embraced the dark side, along with much of Fox News. Those who disagree are "Know-Nothings." And Tony is reduced to quoting a Princeton professor...
Snow does have a point!

APPENDIX C: VIEWS OF ECONOMISTS AND OTHER SOCIAL SCIENTISTS TOWARD IMMIGRATION
Stephen Moore, Rita J. Simon, and Julian L. Simon

There is agreement among economists that immigration has had, and has now, a positive effect upon the economic condition of the United States. We surveyed those persons who have been president of the American Economic Association, as well as those who have members of the President's Council of Economic Advisors. In answer to the question "On balance, what effect has twentieth century immigration had on the nation's economic growth?", 81 percent answered "Very favorable" and 19 percent answered "Slightly favorable". (Complete data may be found at the end of this Appendix.) None of these top economists said that immigration was "slightly" or "very unfavorable," or felt that he or she did not know enough to answer. This extraordinary consensus belies the public picture of the economic profession as being on both sides of all important matters.

The top economists also are willing to extend their backward assessment into a forward-looking policy judgement. When asked "What level of immigration would have the most favorable impact on the U. S. standard of living?", 56 percent said "more", 33 percent said "same number", and none said "fewer". Only 11 percent said "don't know".

It is instructive to compare the views of persons who are not experts in economic affairs. To the latter question about the level of immigration that would be most favorable for the standard of living, a similar high-level panel of other social scientists -- sociologists, political scientists, anthropologists, psychologists, and historians -- responded less favorably. Only 31 percent said that more immigrants would be most favorable. It is also startling to find that even though these non-economist social scientists have no expert knowledge of the matter, only 4 percent were unwilling to hazard a judgment and hence said "don't know", an even smaller proportion than the 11 percent among economists. Perhaps the lack of reluctance of such non-experts to express their views on this technical subject outside their fields of special knowledge helps explain why the subject of immigration is as controversial as it is.

For further comparison, consider the polls of the general public (discussed in Appendix B) asking a fairly similar question, not about the economic effects of immigration, but the more general "Would you like to see the number of immigrants allowed to enter our country increase, decline, or do you think we are letting in about the right number now?" It cannot be known whether the general public response is mainly based on non- economic or economic factors. But to the extent that economic factors enter in, the reaction of the general public is much more negative, and much less positive, than the assessment of top economists.

How should we interpret other social scientists giving more positive responses to these economic questions than other Americans -- even if less positive than economists? One possibility is that the general pattern of higher education being more associated with a positive view of immigration is being displayed here. Another possibility: World-class tenured professors have relatively little to fear from immigrant job competition. But these are speculations rather than facts.)

We also asked economists about the economic effect of illegal immigration: The question was: " What impact does illegal immigration in its current magnitude have on the U.S. economy?" An astonishing 74 percent of the top economists said that "Illegals have a positive impact". Eleven percent said "neutral impact", and 11 percent said "negative impact", with 4 percent "don't know". This is indeed a striking degree of consensus.

This consensus view about illegals held by top economists certainly is at variance with the point of view expressed by most columnists, editorial writers, and television commentators. And the consensus view of economists is quite different from the view held by other top social scientists. Fifty one percent of the other social scientists said "negative impact" about the economic effect of illegals, with only 7 percent "don't know"; it is likely that the general public is even more negative toward illegals. One can only wonder what motivates this view of economic effects of illegals on the part of others than economists. And I marvel at the lack of uncertainty indicated by the small proportion of non-economists who do not feel qualified to answer.

The discrepancy between the view expressed by the economists and that expressed by the other social scientists and by the lay public fits with a general pattern in which laypersons are more worried by many phenomena than are real experts; nuclear power is a striking example. (See Cohen, _____.) At a meeting of world- class experts on agriculture, minerals, oil, forests, soil erosion, and a variety of related natural resource topics, geographer Fraser Hart observed at the end of the day: "All of us are optimistic about our own subjects, but pessimistic about everyone else's," a clear indication of the negative bias on the part of less-informed persons that pervades discussion of resources and demographic movements.

When we asked the non-economist social scientists about the non-economic effects of immigrants, a subject on which they have professional expertise, their judgements are of a different sort. n answer to "What effect has twentieth century immigration into the United States had on the nation's social fabric", 47 percent said "very favorable", 24 percent said "slightly favorable", 13 percent said "slightly unfavorable", and 9 percent said "very unfavorable", with 7 percent "don't know". And in answer to "What effect has twentieth century immigration into the United States had on the nation's culture?" 59 percent said "very favorable", 27 percent said "slightly favorable", 7 percent said "slightly unfavorable", and 2 percent said "very unfavorable", with 5 percent "don't know".

These assessments by non-economic social scientists of immigration's non-economic effects are quite positive. And here it would seem that -- even though such terms as "culture" and "social fabric" may well mean very different things to different people -- the social scientists have this expert advice to give to the American public, derived from their scholarly work: Lay aside your worries (and claims) about conflict and social tension outweighing the positive social-cultural effects of immigration.

So to sum up: If the best economists understand their subject, immigrants -- including illegal immigrants – benefit the economy; they find no economic reason to try not to admit more immigrants, or to prevent the entry of the sort of workers that illegals are, or to get rid of them. This directly contradicts the economic arguments that are given by such organizations as FAIR and THE ENVIRONMENTAL FUND which lobby against immigration, as well as the arguments of the labor union and of such legislators as Senator Alan Simpson. But the voices of such well-respected mainstream economists reported by journalists, who tend to rely instead upon politicians and interest-group advocates for their print stories and television interviews. And the views of the top economists are seldom heard in the current Congressional debate on immigration. ~ Source (Appendix C)

44 posted on 03/31/2006 4:37:56 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Here's a thought for the mexican-flag-wavers, go ahead and show those politicians that they can't treat you this way go on back to your country, or if you decide to stay (after all that is your decision to make isn't it?) than tell those terrible American business people that you DEMAND $20.00 an hour for cleaning those toilets, cutting that grass, digging holes. You won't accept $3.00 an hour anymore, go ahead that'll show them!!!!


45 posted on 03/31/2006 4:43:10 AM PST by stopem (Call any co you deal with and insist they not let any illegal work on or near your property, we did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
I think we should have amnesty for all crimes. We should disband the courts and police forces, after all, people are going to commit crimes anyway. And I'm sure they have good reasons for committing them.

Then criminals can finally "come out of the shadows" and yadda yadda...

Do I need a sarcasm tag?

46 posted on 03/31/2006 7:40:15 AM PST by blueminnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Actually, my taxes are going to old white people to pay for their prescription drugs. My 13% in SSI s going to old white people.


47 posted on 03/31/2006 8:18:40 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
but they clog any medical emergency center I have ever seen that has a linoleum floor,

I've never seen any ER where illegals were more than 10% of the patients. My sample size is about 15 viewings over 10 years.

48 posted on 03/31/2006 8:21:14 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes
Those who disagree are "Know-Nothings."

And those on the other side of the debate "have embraced the dark side"

49 posted on 03/31/2006 8:22:13 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: seastay
Immigration averaged only 235,000 persons per year prior to the disastrous 1965 Immigration Act. That's only 47 million immigrants over the course of our nation's history. Compared to our current population of nearly 300 million, that's not much.

BS. Slanderous and spinning statistics. Prior to 1965, 47 million immigrated and prior to 1965, US population was 170 million, NOT 300 MILLION. Or immigrants by your stats were about 1/3.

50 posted on 03/31/2006 8:25:06 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

FYI, Murdoch is a recent immigrant to the US as is Brin (co founder of google) and Yang (co founder of Yahoo).


51 posted on 03/31/2006 8:27:06 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Not at all. Tony Snow is, when all is said and done, a member of the MSM who has embraced the values of the American elite (i.e "illegal immigration, what, me worry?") There are two kinds of governments in the world: The first kind, fortunately there aren't as many as there used to be, oppress their people. This is a fool's errand, and such governments fail sooner or later. The SECOND kind is smarter; this kind of government does not oppress its people, it merely IGNORES them, and largely does the bidding of elites and certain interest groups. This is what we have in the USA today--a representative republic that doesn't represent. You see it in illegal immigration policy, outsourcing, health insurance, even the war in Iraq. There is a cartoon "happy bunny" popular with young people who says insensitive things for a laugh. One of his catchphrases is "I know how you feel, I just don't care." This is the attitude of the US government (all 3 branches) and the American elite toward the population at large.


52 posted on 03/31/2006 8:32:41 AM PST by Colonel Batguano (Purity of essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
The discrepancy between the view expressed by the economists and that expressed by the other social scientists and by the lay public

I think it is as simple as wanting to be a small fish in a big pond or a big fish in a little pond. Lets say your are a millionaire and a billionaire moves into your neighborhood. Are you happy or sad ? Immigrants may make the neighborhood better, but the current residents lose some control and we all know people like to have control.

There are also a lot of people who don't like change. Every see what happens when a long running low rated show is replaced by a higher rated tv show ? A lot of times all hell breaks lose.

53 posted on 03/31/2006 8:35:29 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
"1965, US population was 170 million, NOT 300 MILLION. '

Of course, but what the stats are trying to say is that we are approaching a billion total Americans who live now or who have ever lived in this country—all of them, or at least most of them were busy "building" it.

As of 1965 if one were to add the number of immigrants who had lived in the country since its founding, it would only be 47 million. Since 1965, I dont know the added numbers, but suppose immigrates doubled, that still is only less that 10% of those working in this county total throughout history were actually immigrants, the rest were born here, so therefore it is a myth that immigrants built this country, at most they only but 10%.


54 posted on 03/31/2006 10:30:29 AM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

"Question: Do you have dual citizenship? Curious. My son's gf's mom is from Iceland. She holds on to her Icelandic citizebship because of the healthcare system there."

No I Just have permanent residence not a citizen yet, working in California for a tech firm. Most legal immigrants are furious that the bush administration is pushing this guest worker amnesty. I waited almost 5 years (yes in Iceland) before I got my greencard. Icelanders are usually very pro USA.

Bestu kvedjur,

Icelander


55 posted on 03/31/2006 12:16:07 PM PST by Icelander (Legal Resident Since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Good grief, et tu, Tony?


56 posted on 03/31/2006 12:17:03 PM PST by samcgwire (samcgwire was not here today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Tony Snow seems to have embraced the dark side. I'm surprised.

How quickly we turn on people.

57 posted on 03/31/2006 12:18:29 PM PST by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
This guy is nuts.

You may or may not agree with him on this issue, but on the best day you ever had, you weren't 1000th of man he is. Someone is nuts, but it ain't him.

58 posted on 03/31/2006 12:21:48 PM PST by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Icelander

God bless you! I mean that most sincerely!


59 posted on 03/31/2006 12:22:54 PM PST by samcgwire (samcgwire was not here today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: samcgwire
"Rather than panicking, the political class might want to take a deep breath and attempt a little common sense. Virtually everyone agrees that we need to secure our borders, deport lawbreakers and slackers among the illegal-immigrant population, and revitalize the notion of citizenship by insisting that prospective citizens master the English language and the fundaments of American history and culture."

You disagree with this?

60 posted on 03/31/2006 12:30:19 PM PST by Protagoras (The world is full of successful idiots and genius failures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson