It needs to be done in the daylight. I know it has more risk this way, but we need to get the people involved along with the facilities. The advisors, the scientists, these are more difficult to replace.
It's coming. About a week or ten days ago the US gave Iran a month to disarm.
We have to, there is no other choice.
I think if we really wanted to, we could wipe it out in a few seconds.
The schedule could be posted, leaflets could be dropped, and two-hours warning to get out of the facilities, and they still couldn't stop anything.
I like this guy, Bentsen. When can we start?
So what are we waiting for?
Listening to the "Slam Dunk" chorus never gets old.
Let's wait longer and let them move them like Saddam did or bury them deeper so we'll look like fools.
"You want nukes? Would you like those delivered?"
Bttt.
Yea! we know the U.S. could eliminate the Iranian nuclear program in two days,What matters is whether the U.S. had the will to do what was required.
It is the pacifits who have lost the ability to think and reason. Islam is an idiology that is well focused and brainwashed into it's followers, they are united and determined to achieve their goals.
No amount of talk will change that. Talk is a weakness in their eyes, and we are very weak, because we are determined to talk instead of doing what must be done. Hitler talked as well, he used talk to buy himself time to gain strength and buld defenses. These "Islamic fundamentalists" who see Hitler as a prophet second to only Mohammad, as a person who used Mohammad's war manual to great benifit, and have learn from Hitlers mistakes. This time, the more "talk" they can drag their enemies (us) in, the more time they can buy to assure their success in achieving their goals. There is no doubt in my mind they have already built a nuclear weapon. Now, talk and time is only allowing them to build more, and better ones.
"We can dig those things out. We can destroy them," he told The Jerusalem Post in an interview. Maybe??
The Germans who built Sadaams bunker correctly predicted we couldn't take it out with our Bunker Busters.
When we routed Sadaam and inspected the bunker that we bombed it was intact.
(Esser was a consultant for a German government-sponsored civil protection body and had his own company, Schutzraumtechnik Esser GmbH, which supplied equipment for Saddam's bunker.)
But Esser said "bunker busting" bombs would fail to penetrate the 1,800 square-meter bunker because they first have to get though the palace built directly above it.
"The presidential palace above gives natural protection so the bunker can only be cracked by ground troops or a tactical nuclear bomb," said Esser.
OK, but it would be more credible if he had actually found him.
Mideast Ping!
I would like to make a bold proposal....
not only do we bomb Irans nuke facilities, we take out their entire oil industry as well...oil rigs, onloading port facilities, refineries..everything...yes oil will go to $150 per barrel, but that would be less than the quadrupeling of prices etween 1973 and 1974...yes, it would likely cause a recession...but the negative impacts would last at most for 3 years. By 1976, the economy had begun to recover from the 1973 oil shock..unemployment and inflation had both fallen from their 1975 highs...the stock market which fell 45% in 1973-74 rose by over 50% between 1975 and 76.
It would cause us pain for a few years, but an Iranian nuke would cause us pain for eternity. We can live without Iranian oil, but Iran cannot.
Hey Annan, Kennedy, Kerry, Biden, Ried, France, Russia, China, the UN, and anyone else I might have missed, ARE YOU LISTENING TO THIS?????????????
Guess not, figures.......................