Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Go navy. This is the last carrier in this series. The next carrier will have a new redesign. Nothing like our carrier fleet on the planet. Huge floating acres of sovereign American territory.
1 posted on 03/18/2006 5:06:45 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MARKUSPRIME

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/carriers.htm


2 posted on 03/18/2006 5:06:54 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Man, oh man,

That is some crane lifting the bow "super lift" into position.


3 posted on 03/18/2006 5:09:44 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

as long as the Empire State Building is tall...

Gooooooolly Sarge!


4 posted on 03/18/2006 5:13:41 AM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

When the contract for CVN 77 was let, there was talk of incorporating some of the design features of the next series of carriers. Features such as stealthy superstructure, greatly increased automation and smaller crew.


5 posted on 03/18/2006 5:15:42 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

I personally own a Grumman carrier. Here's one just like it: http://img.alibaba.com/img/product/11/15/75/11157514.jpg


6 posted on 03/18/2006 5:23:06 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth (Di'ver'si'ty (adj.): A compound word derived from the root words: division; perversion; adversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

780 tons seems a bit light for a carrier.


7 posted on 03/18/2006 5:23:06 AM PST by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Never mind, the article wasn't talking about the whole ship.


8 posted on 03/18/2006 5:25:11 AM PST by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Huge floating acres of sovereign American territory.

So nicely put that I thought it beared repeating.


9 posted on 03/18/2006 5:28:08 AM PST by Mrs. Shawnlaw (No NAIS! And the USDA can bugger off, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

How thick is the metal on an aircraft carrier?

Does the Navy still use wood for decks or steel?

Are sailors still portioned a measure of rum each day or did that custom end?


10 posted on 03/18/2006 5:33:30 AM PST by sergeantdave (The business of business is none of the government's business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME; Jeff Head
Bird farm bump.

5.56mm

11 posted on 03/18/2006 5:36:26 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

It will be the USS Bill Clinton, count on it. After the USS Carter, the USS Reagan, and the USS George H Bush, it's Clinton's turn.


12 posted on 03/18/2006 5:42:36 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

If anyone wants to be truly impressed, visit Newport News. Go downtown to the shipyard area and look at a carrier under construction or refit – the tallest building in Newport News is any carrier in the shipyard. These ships are truly huge, but they don’t look all that big until you get within a few blocks of the shipyard.


18 posted on 03/18/2006 6:05:00 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

".........the nation's sole designer, builder and refueler of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers."
Disturbing. The concentration of military production facilities is short sighted. It may be cost effective but the lack of production redundancy could prove fatal.


24 posted on 03/18/2006 6:11:19 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

CVN 77 Upper Bow Lift - March 15, 2006
The nation's tenth and final Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), grows by 780 tons as the upper bow unit is placed onto the ship. Photo by Chris Oxley

CVN 77 Upper Bow Lift - March 15, 2006
The George H.W. Bush is the second carrier with the bulbous bow design. USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) is the first. Photo by Rick Thompson

CVN 77 Upper Bow Lift - March 15, 2006
The addition of the upper bow on the George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) completes the flight deck and extends the overall length of the carrier to its full size, which is as long as the Empire State Building is tall. Photo by Rick Thompson

46 posted on 03/18/2006 8:12:37 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

How about the USS Rush Limbaugh CVN-77?


61 posted on 03/18/2006 9:14:26 AM PST by Vision ("There are no limits to growth because there are no limits of human intelligence" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME

A former carrier captain once told me, actually, he asked me then gave me the answer. He asked, how many kinds of ships do you think we have in the US Navy? I said, I don't know. He said, the answer is real simple. We have two kinds, submarines and targets.


81 posted on 03/19/2006 9:20:24 AM PST by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MARKUSPRIME
Cool pic here


84 posted on 03/21/2006 8:13:55 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson