Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Japan and the West, it's breed or die [Mark Steyn]
Jerusalem Post ^ | Mar. 16, 2006 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 03/15/2006 5:09:01 PM PST by Alouette

Here is Theodore Faron, Fellow of Merton College, Oxford, writing in the year 2021: "Like a lecherous stud suddenly stricken with impotence, we are humiliated at the very heart of our faith in ourselves. For all our knowledge, our intelligence, our power, we can no longer do what the animals do without thought."

That's from the first chapter of P. D. James' novel The Children Of Men. On the shelves at Borders, Baroness James is the Agatha Christie de nos jours, but she has other strings to her bow and her dystopian vision of a world in which the human race is unable to breed is a marvelous read, if not quite true to life: In The Children Of Men, man is physically impotent; out here in the real world, it would be accurate to say we're psychosomatically barren - at least in the non-red-state parts of the developed world.

I've been a big demography bore for a while now and it affords some melancholy satisfaction to see the other fellows catching up, at least apropos Europe. The literal facts of life are what underpins, for example, the Danish cartoon war - the belated realization among Continentals that they're elderly and fading and that their Muslim populations are young and surging, and in all these clashes the latter are putting down markers for the way things will be the day after tomorrow, like the new owners who have the kitchen remodeled before moving in.

Pre-9/11, I never paid much attention to demography. A decade ago, I accepted the experts' standard line that the Japanese economy had tanked because the joint was riddled with protectionism and cronyism. But so what? You could have said the same 30 years ago, when the place was booming, or 15 years ago, when we were bombarded with all those TV commercials warning that the yellow peril was annexing America. The only real structural difference between Japan then and Japan now is that the yellow peril got a lot wrinklier: 14% of its population is under 15, as opposed to 21% in the United States, just under 30% in Iran and 40% in Pakistan. What happened in the 1990s was what Yamada Masahiro of Gakugei University calls the first "low birth-rate recession."

THE MOST geriatric jurisdiction on the planet, Nippon's rising sun has now passed into the next phase of its long sunset: net population loss. 2005 was the first year since records began with more deaths than births. The world's other elderly societies have complicating factors: In Europe, the successor population is already in place - Islam - and the only question is how bloody the transfer of real estate will be. But Japan offers the chance to observe the demographic death spiral in its purest form. It's a country with no immigration, no significant minorities and no desire for any: just the Japanese, aging and dwindling.

So what will happen? There are two possible scenarios: Whatever their feelings on immigration, a country with great infrastructure won't stay empty for long, any more than a state-of-the-art factory that goes belly up stays empty for long. At some point, someone else will move in to Japan's plant.

And the alternative? Well, a year ago, the country's toymakers, with fewer and fewer children to serve, began marketing a new doll called Yumel - a baby boy with a range of 1,200 phrases designed to serve as companions for elderly Japanese. He says not just the usual things - "I wuv you" - but also ask the questions your grandchildren would ask if you had any: "Why do elephants have long noses?" Yumel joins his friend, the Snuggling Ifbot, a toy designed to have the conversation of a five-year old child which its makers, with the usual Japanese efficiency, have determined is just enough chit-chat to prevent the old folks going senile.

P. D. James foresaw a similar development: toys for women whose maternal instinct has gone unfulfilled. In The Children Of Men, pretend mothers take their dolls for walks on the street or to the swings in the park.

It's not hard to see where this is going. Will an ever smaller number of young people want to spend their active years looking after an ever greater number of old people? Or will it be simpler to put all that cutting-edge Japanese technology to good use and create a new subordinate worker class? As a popular beat combo predicted back in the Eighties: "Domo arigato, Mr Roboto... For doing the jobs that nobody wants to" Remember who sang that? A band called Styx. And the need to avoid the old one-way ticket up the River Styx is what will prompt Japan to take a flier on Mr. Roboto and, eventually, the post-human future.

There is a third option. Unlike the Europeans, many of whom will flee their continent as Eutopia evolves into Eurabia, the Japanese are not facing ethnic strife and civil war. They could simply start breeding again. But will they? What's easier for the governing class? Weaning a pampered population off the good life and re-teaching them the lost biological impulse or giving the Sony Corporation a license to become the Cloney Corporation? Reporting the latest grim demographics, The Japan Times observed, almost en passant, "Japan joins Germany and Italy in the ranks of countries where a decline in population has already set in."

Japan, Germany and Italy, eh? If the Versailles Treaty was too hard on our enemies, the World War Two settlement was kinder but lethal.

The writer is senior North American columnist for Britain's Telegraph Group.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Japan; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: birthrate; demography; germany; italy; japan; steyn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
"Japan joins Germany and Italy in the ranks of countries where a decline in population has already set in."

The humiliation of losing World War II. America's fault.

Seriously, though, I am glad that I had 9 kids so I can't say I regret not having more kids.

1 posted on 03/15/2006 5:09:06 PM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A Jovial Cad; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; adam_az; af_vet_rr; agrace; ahayes; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel/Russian Jewry ping list.

Warning! This is a high-volume ping list.

2 posted on 03/15/2006 5:09:42 PM PST by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 77-78)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Do we all have to jump start this by moving to Utah?


3 posted on 03/15/2006 5:12:45 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Alouette
President Bush must issue a decree!!

FUCP

5 posted on 03/15/2006 5:12:53 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

They are following Bill Clintons lead and only having oral, and as he said, it isn't sex.


6 posted on 03/15/2006 5:14:25 PM PST by Frank_N_Sense (Whose DNA stain is on Hillary's blue dress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
The only real structural difference between Japan then and Japan now is that the yellow peril got a lot wrinklier: 14% of its population is under 15, as opposed to 21% in the United States, just under 30% in Iran and 40% in Pakistan. What happened in the 1990s was what Yamada Masahiro of Gakugei University calls the first "low birth-rate recession."

Catchy, but what happened was Japan's economy was attacked by their central bank in 1989 (similar to 1929, and 1999 in the US). The resulting collapse left worthless or greatly devalued assets on banks' balance sheets that they never wrote off (A Japanese custom it seems). Banks were unable to lend much money as a result. In spite of massive, wasteful spending by the government, Japan still experienced deflation. They are just now starting to show signs of sufficient liquidity.

7 posted on 03/15/2006 5:23:19 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

What's scary is that it is not a concern to both the left and conservatives in those countries. I noticed the followed talking points when the topic of demographic troubles comes up here in New Zealand. I guess most people in Japan and Europe think along similar lines:




On the conservative side, it is commonly believed that 1) birthrates are encyclical that people see fewer children means more resources for children, so they automatically have more children - a self-correcting mechanism; 2) even if the birthrate declines irreversibly, the increased productivity brought forth by modern economy will more than compensate the economic deficits given that yes, there are fewer people on the net, but we can have more of them proportionately working on higher end occupations. Menial labour demands can be reduced by increased industrial and agricultural automations, and even the unsustainable welfare demands can altogether be solved as a falling population forces the society to move into a more market-oriented direction; and 3) overcrowding will become a thing of the past and resources become mroe sustainable.

On the left, it is believed population falls is a good thing because it means less strain on natural resources and less impact of humans on ecosystems.




Basically, people in these places sneer at demographic disaster talks as "oldtime social democrats talking points". They wouldn't know or care a disaster is coming.


8 posted on 03/15/2006 5:25:26 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
It seems the less religion you have, the less children you have.

As the Christian song Because He Lives puts it,

"How sweet to hold a newborn baby
And feel the pride and joy he gives,
But greater still the calm assurance
This child can face uncertain days
Because He lives!"

9 posted on 03/15/2006 5:27:41 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God is, and (2) God is good?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

bump


10 posted on 03/15/2006 5:31:13 PM PST by eureka! (Hey Lefties and 'Rats: 3 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK

The West is in love with their social programs and thus the major concern about population.

Europe will not get much help from the Muslims.


11 posted on 03/15/2006 5:33:58 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

They sure made a lot of bad investments. Over priced hotels and golf courses topped the newspaper list. But these were so much chump change when you consider Bridgestone's purchase of Firestone. It took the combined company more than 25 years to chew down the debt of buying a bankrupt Firestone Tire which had no products and mostly antiquated factories.


12 posted on 03/15/2006 5:46:49 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheLion

I know I am dating myself, but I can't help but remember the old 70s movies like "Soylent Green" which predicted that we would be so over-populated by now that we would be "eating" processed dead people.
Gramted...places like China and India and Arab countries continue to grow exponentially, but the film makers then were as clueless as they are now about serious subjects.


13 posted on 03/15/2006 5:50:58 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Nine kids! What wealth! I envy you!


14 posted on 03/15/2006 5:53:32 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (L'Chaim, L;Chaim, to Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

I know many of my fellow FReepers hate him but Pat Buchanon made this identical point (and even more precisely) in his book, "The Death of the West." It is a good read whether you like Buchanon or not.


15 posted on 03/15/2006 5:54:09 PM PST by stand4somethin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

bump


16 posted on 03/15/2006 5:55:32 PM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

Israel is the most and most immediately vulnerable because of depopulation.


17 posted on 03/15/2006 6:01:17 PM PST by wrathof59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Ping.


18 posted on 03/15/2006 6:06:17 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Back in the 1960s Herman Kahn wrote a book: JAPAN - THE COMING SUPERPOWER. In it he had an illustration of the Japanese demographic "Christmas tree." This is a diagram used by demographers. Usually it's a pyramid. The bottom layer is the number of people aged 0 - 5, the next layer is 6 - 10, etc. Each successive layer is usually smaller, as a result of the deaths in that cohort when they were younger. Only with rare exceptions will one layer be smaller than the one above it. When this happens, it's because of wartime deaths, a famine, depression, etc.

The Japanese demographic tree that Kahn showed wasn't a pyramid, it was a Christmas tree, with a "trunk" narrower than the next older cohort.

It was obvious to me at the time, although Kahn didn't see it, that Japan was headed for a demographic disaster. That disaster has now taken place. I didn't look at the equivalent demographic distribution for Europe, but the signs of demographic disaster were probably apparent 20 or 30 years ago.

The chickens are coming home to roost. The massive refusal in the industrialized nations to have children is having the inevitable result.

Some time ago I recall reding in THE FUTURIST, the journal of the World Future Society, an article about a new trend: the DINKs. That stands for Double Income, No Kids. The article described their hedonistic lifestyle. Sure, you can live it up with two incomes. but when you can no longer work, who's going to pay your pension and your social security? Stocks and bonds are worthless if there are no workers for the firms in which you have invested. The same thing holds for social security. No workers, no taxes. No taxes, no social security.

It won't be the meek who inherit the Earth. It will be the prolific. And right now that looks like the Muslims.

19 posted on 03/15/2006 6:06:51 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

Correct.And scary.


20 posted on 03/15/2006 6:10:01 PM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a creditcard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson