Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran 'to build' second nuke plant
Herald Sun ^ | 13 March 2006

Posted on 03/13/2006 3:06:14 AM PST by Aussie Dasher

IRAN is to start work in the next six months on a second nuclear power station, the energy minister said, amid increasing tension with the West over its atomic programme.

"We have received the plans of (Iran's atomic energy chief) Gholam Reza Aghazadeh and the authorisation to start building the power station," said Energy Minister Parviz Fattah in comments published in local newspapers.

"We are expecting to start the construction of the power station in the next six months," he said.

Former energy minister, the reformist Habibollah Bitaraf, would be charged with the project, he said.

Iran's nuclear programme, which Tehran says is a drive for peaceful energy but is alleged by the United States to be a cover for weapons production, is due to be discussed on the UN Security Council next week amid the looming threat of sanctions.

Iran is building its first civilian nuclear power station near the southern city of Bushehr with Russian help but the project has been hit by a string of delays.

"The Russians have promised to finish the power station at the end of 2006. In previous years they have repeatedly delayed the start-up of the power station," said Fattah.

"We have complaints against the Russians and we hope that they will not postpone the start-up of the power station again," he added.

The Iranian parliament on Tuesday authorised the government to use over $US200 million in oil income in order to complete the station.

Aghazadeh has previously announced that Iran was inviting tenders for two new nuclear power stations and encouraged Russia to express its interest.

Both the new plants would be built in Bushehr, he said at the time.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dosomething; energy; iran; nukes; secendplant; wannabet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
At exactly what point do we decide that action is needed to stop this?
1 posted on 03/13/2006 3:06:19 AM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Never. Between the utter gutlessness of the EU and the totally irresponsible partisanship of the US Democrat Party leadership, the West is paralyzed. Once again it will be up to Israel.
2 posted on 03/13/2006 3:08:57 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I think we need to finish one war before we start another one.

If there is to be one it better be declared by the UN or another country. The U.S. is starting to look like dictator!

IMO, of course.


3 posted on 03/13/2006 3:25:07 AM PST by beachn4fun (The people who are responsible for terrorist attacks are the terrorists." - Tony Blair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun

Unfortunatly, all responsbile adults are hated for doing the right thing at one time or another in their lifetimes. It just so happens that the USA is one of the few adults left on the planet, thats how good the lib brainwashing has been.


4 posted on 03/13/2006 3:34:15 AM PST by son of caesar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Mr. Pentagon planner, please add this to the target list!


5 posted on 03/13/2006 4:22:58 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
At exactly what point do we decide that action is needed to stop this?

We have allowed lunatics in North Korea and crazed zealot radicals in Pakistan to have nukes.

Why not Iran? Is three a crowd for you? We ALWAYS go wimpy--we will again.

6 posted on 03/13/2006 5:00:09 AM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

If history is any guide, about 22 years of condemning Israel for taking care of the dirty work.


7 posted on 03/13/2006 5:59:55 AM PST by thoughtomator (Nobody would have cared if the UAE wanted to buy Macy's...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

The best-laid plans of mullahs and men . . .


8 posted on 03/13/2006 9:25:54 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun

Well, I agree.

It would be pretty hard to settle a war with Iran when Iraq is still in progress.

IMO, Iran is a much bigger danger than Iraq ever was, or would ever become even. I dont think anything is going to be done about this, though. Five years down the line, we may have to live with a nuke armed, mullah run Iran in perpetuity.


9 posted on 03/13/2006 10:47:10 AM PST by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

that's does sit! send the UN Ispectors in! [/sarc]


10 posted on 03/13/2006 11:06:40 AM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun
If there is to be one it better be declared by the UN or another country. The U.S. is starting to look like dictator!

Laughable post. The UN isn't able to organize and run a respectable food aid program much less declare war. Pin hopes of the United Neuters defending freedom or protecting your way of life and you'll be burka-clad and bowing to mecca five times a day.

So America looks like a dictator to you, eh? Perhaps you'd like to diddy on down to Cuba and see what dictatorship is really like. Or maybe you really belong on a liberal discussion forum instead of FR.

11 posted on 03/13/2006 11:32:00 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Dear Congressmoron.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

Israel won't tolerate that, they cannot, they would be obliterated.


12 posted on 03/13/2006 1:20:26 PM PST by conservativewasp (Liberals lie for sport and hate our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun
I think we need to finish one war before we start another one.

"We´re at war. Iraq is a part of the war on terror. It is not the war on terror; it is a theater in the war on terror. And it´s essential we win this battle in the war on terror. By winning this battle, it will make other victories more certain in the war against the terrorists." President George W Bush

13 posted on 03/13/2006 1:23:38 PM PST by ASA Vet (Those who talk don't know, those who know don't talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

You are talking specifically. You must be a man.

I am talking about "in the eyes of the world."

How are we ever going to stay on good terms with countries who do not necessarily share our view points, if all they see is us invading these Arab countries? Or, those countries who do not share our view points?

And, why must you ASSUME that I need to be on a liberal discussion forum just because I worry that the U.S. is being drug into another war by outside forces? If you can't see it, then open your eyes.

Maybe you need to stop ASSUMING that people on FR who have different opinions than YOU are liberals!


14 posted on 03/14/2006 3:58:05 AM PST by beachn4fun (“Americans never quit.” ~ General Douglas Macarthur (1880 - 1964))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun
I am talking about "in the eyes of the world."

Who, like France? Spain? Germany? Every one of them losing their own population, culture and identity to Eurabia encroachment. France and Germany are so dirty in the Oil for Food scandal, it'd rock the planet, to the extent we'll never know the true details of all that corruption. The allies of the US that help us militarily like Australia and Britain are fully on our side. Whether it be Iraq, Iran or tsunami assistance, it's the MILITARY that will effectively respond, NOT the UN!!

Here's a clue for you. Arab countries like Egypt, UAE, Qatar, as well as others are SCARED TO DEATH that Iran will get nukes. They'd privately be falling over silly with relief at having us take care of the situation, although their words would be publically critical or else silence. Nonetheless, Iran poses MUCH more of a threat to it's neighbors armed with nukes? Think we ought to ignore that? Think we ought to let Iran threaten their neighbors?

So you ever really LISTEN to what the President has to say??

If you want to worry about how Arab's view us, worry about the ports debacle. That's truely worth being concerned about and is going to bite us in the rear for a long time.

I assume you might need to be on a liberal discussion board because frankly, you sound like a liberal. Cowering approval from the UN and countries who hate America and will always hate America regardless of what we do or don't do, is generally a liberal trait.

Quite simply, we'll handle this situation, with allied assistance, because we are the only country who can.

Oh, and BTW, wrong gender guess too.

15 posted on 03/14/2006 2:44:48 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Dear Congressmoron.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun

The UN is notoriously corrupt and spineless and the EU is spineless. And it does not matter what the world thinks of us. All that matters is doing what is right and that is preventing the mullahs from getting nukes.


16 posted on 03/14/2006 4:23:28 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.N. Building. What a joke! They turned it into low rent housing. It's a dump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: conservativewasp

I agree. It boils down to this. We take action or Israel does or Israeli and European cities (and trough terrorists US cities) become radioactive wastelands.


17 posted on 03/14/2006 4:25:23 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.N. Building. What a joke! They turned it into low rent housing. It's a dump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon

No problem. Bombers always have an ordnance or two for the return trip.


18 posted on 03/14/2006 4:26:18 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

I agree with you. The ports deal and the iran nuke thing have seemed to have exposed the leftists on FR.


19 posted on 03/14/2006 4:27:23 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.N. Building. What a joke! They turned it into low rent housing. It's a dump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Well stated!!


20 posted on 03/14/2006 9:39:07 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson