Posted on 03/12/2006 3:48:31 AM PST by Caipirabob
Go to Morrison's RX pharmacy in Plantation for 30 Nexium gastric reflux pills, and the list price is $202. Drive two miles to Costco in Davie, and it's $131.
Unlike most products, the cost of medicine can vary sharply from store to store -- sometimes double or triple the lowest price -- as a result of the nation's complex and loosely regulated drug-selling system.
LocalLinks Pharmacy industry experts say many people do not realize they can save money by comparison shopping, and that they can check a state Internet site that now posts prices of the most popular drugs from more than 150 stores each in Broward and Palm Beach counties.
Howard Brofman knows. The Boca Raton retiree said he used to think prescription drugs cost about the same everywhere until a friend sent him to a local store with good prices. Brofman started checking other places and found he had been paying $40 at Walgreens for a drug selling at Costco for $22.
"I was stunned by the difference when I started paying attention," Brofman said. "How could it be so different? It's not like the price of a car where you can buy it or not. People must have that drug."
(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...
At any rate, I haven't had my coffee yet so instantly I'm PO'd thinking this is just some whiney liberal rant attempting to force Ma&Pa shops to sell at a loss, or for "Big Gubmit" to step in and slice the cheese equally. Idiots...
"I was stunned by the difference when I started paying attention," Brofman said. "How could it be so different? It's not like the price of a car where you can buy it or not. People must have that drug."
That's becuase you're an idiot, Brofman. A socialist weenie licking the boots of big socialist brother hoping he'll drop a few choice breadcrumbs because you're at least a "useful" idiot.
Alright, I'll finish my coffee. I'm just mean before my Huila in the morning. Have at it!
The prices of drugs are really very much like the prices of other expensive items--they vary profoundly depending on where and how you buy them. For example, if you're looking for a high end digital camera, giant screen projection TV, or similar item, you're well advised to go to the Internet and Google the item you want. A host of sellers and prices will appear and the prices charged by the various sellers can vary by every bit as much as the drug prices mentioned in this article. With drugs, as with everything else, it boils down to the fact that the smart, informed consumer who's willing to do a little research will save a lot of money.
Another thing about maintenance drugs, in particular, that's not true of other expensive items, is that many large, heavily discounting distributors, like Medco Health, sell maintenance drugs in three month lots and set up one year prescriptions so they can be refilled over the Internet, with the drugs being delivered by mail. This saves a tremendous amount of time, inconvenience, and cost. I know because that's how I get my medications. If I went to a local drug store I could easily be paying at least thirty percent more.
Because most people have a ten dollar co-pay no matter where they buy. In the days when I had one I did not comparison shop either.
Now that I pay up front I always check around and order a 90 day supply when possible.
Every week out local paper lists the prices of common items. I would say there there is always a store price variation for pretty much every item. The same brand of large can of wasbai peas can range from $2.99 to $5.99 within a mile drive of the other stores. Fresh fruits and veggies have a similar problem. One store a bag of raddishes are 75 cent a pount and another $2.49 a pound. A smart shopper will find the better price and go there.
That is true, and I am one of those. I understand the basic theory, but the application seems to have so many holes as to make the theory questionable. My scientific training included lots of theory and observable facts. After all was said and done, we were trained to step back and look at how the individual parts interacted to produce the net impact or result. What was good for a part was often bad for the whole and vise versa. When I step back and see the person living on $1,500 per month being charged $900 each month for basic medicines, something doesn't seem right. When my insurance company is billed $280 for the same procedure that is chargeable at $3,800 to a minimum wage worker without insurance, then something doesn't seem right. When my son's insurance was billed $22,500 for a procedure that was grossed up for the uninsured at $98,000, something doesn't seem quite right. One can argue theory all day, but it takes a very cold person to see the theory only works to the advantage of a part and that we need to step back and reevaluate how to fix many of the problem areas.
You are exactly right. Freedom of choice with your dollar. I do it all the time. Sounds like you do too.
I wouldn't doubt that this same "reporter" has written an article detailing how gas prices are almost identical. Thus they are price fixing.
Fair enough, so long as we also quit giving in to Big Pharma's use of government to keep their prices high. Americans should have the same right to shop around for better prices that do with anything else we can buy over the Internet.
When one steps back and looks at the big picture, they may find that many of the poor, who didn't provide for themselves, were once working Americans who were displaced by the exportation of American jobs to the third world. The process started 15-20 years ago.
I didn't realize that it had already reached the Pharmacists level. Like a cancer it will slowly eat out the livelihood of current Americans until the Native Americans have been replaced by the third world (it seems as if this already happened to the previous version of Native Americans). The big difference is that the original Native Americans weren't sold out by their leadership to a lessor advanced culture. Our current leadership sees the world as a collection of large plantations with many serfs and a moneyed aristocrats overseen by a small number of royal families. Most of these modern royal familes are powerful syndicates. But occasionally, their public contact is through a common blood family. The Kennedys and the Bushes are the most visible at the current time.
Don't expect any relief from the government. It is their plan to replace you with a third world serf mindset that is easier to control the traditional Independent American mindset.
I agree, Our leadership is close to treason on this issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.