Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

>>>> ... if we are in a "long war" against Islamofascism and homeland security is our highest priority, why are U.S. troops not defending a 2,000-mile border where a million aliens are caught every year and the number of those from nations other than Mexico has tripled to 150,000 in two years?

Simple Pat. Bush&Company support open borders. Period. Let the foreigners in illegally.

1 posted on 02/28/2006 9:15:59 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man
Simple Pat. Bush&Company support open borders. Period. Let the foreigners in illegally.

Of course the fact that the Border Patrol has gotten the most funding and the greatest amount of technological upgraded in its history from President Bush's Admin just doesn't matter because the Whine All The Time Choir is NOT intrested in reality merely finding the NEXT thing to have their daily hissy fit about. Funny how a "Reagan Man" willingly lies about Bush and then makes excuses for the 1986 Illegal Alien Amnesty HIS supposed "hero" Reagan signed.

2 posted on 02/28/2006 9:19:36 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man

I see this is by Pat Buchanan ..no need to read it


3 posted on 02/28/2006 9:20:10 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
The worlds collided when Bush stood beside Vicente Fox and denounced the Minutemen, folks who had gone to Arizona to help spot illegal aliens for the Border Patrol, as "vigilantes." They thought they were patriots helping Bush defend the nation.

As a two time Bush voter I wouldn't want to defend that position on our open borders, or his Islam is a religion of peace opinion, or we all worship the same God opinion.

Otherwise."Your doing a great job Bushie." - tom

4 posted on 02/28/2006 9:28:51 AM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
A major battle is underway for the heart and mind of Bush and America's future and the GOP is in the middle.

The backers of free trade and the backers of war on Islam are pitted against each other. Both operate with religious fervor that their cause is right and want to move America is that direction.

Deprived of air are those that echo the contents of Washington's Farewell Address as reported:

Two-thirds of the Address is devoted to domestic matters and the rise of political parties, and Washington set out his vision of what would make the United States a truly great nation. He called for men to put aside party and unite for the common good, an "American character" wholly free of foreign attachments. The United States must concentrate only on American interests, and while the country ought to be friendly and open its commerce to all nations, it should avoid becoming involved in foreign wars. Contrary to some opinion, Washington did not call for isolation, only the avoidance of entangling alliances. While he called for maintenance of the treaty with France signed during the American Revolution, the problems created by that treaty ought to be clear. The United States must "act for ourselves and not for others."

GOP Quo Vadis?

5 posted on 02/28/2006 9:29:32 AM PST by ex-snook (God of the Universe, God of Creation, God of Love, thank you for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
In the "Buchanan World" it would not be necessary to invade Iraq, or even fight the WOT, all we need do is lock the doors, pull in the welcome mat, and prepare to conduct a new "cold war" with Saddam, Iran, Al Qaeda, etc. We would be just as secure as we were before all these terrible Neocons took over. Like... when Clinton was "focusing like a laser beam" on terrorism, and he and Richard Clarke effectively seized Ozama Bin Laden, and prevented the 9/11 attack on the WTC. Funny how different the "Buchanan World" is from the real one.
8 posted on 02/28/2006 9:37:36 AM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man

Bush's thinking is definitely convoluted when it comes to America's security. His constant pushing for amnesty for illegals reminds me of a spoiled brat that keeps asking for a cookie even though he's been told "NO" again and again.


9 posted on 02/28/2006 9:40:19 AM PST by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man

Oh crap. Not that globalist Bush again. The guy who unilaterally ditched the ABM treaty with Russia, the guy who won't sign onto the chemical weapons prohibition, the guy who appointed John Negroponte and John Bolton to the UN, the guy who refuses to cater to the caterwauling about global warming, the guy who will not allow us to be part of the International Criminal Court, the guy who against world opinion and the UN, conquered Iraq, the guy who still refuses to do business with Castro despite western Europe's abhorence, the guy who has been bitch slapping Canada on trade issues, the guy who is chipping away at the nazi like EPA, the guy who is going to restart nuclear power in this country, and the guy who knows its better to be feared than to be loved. That guy?


10 posted on 02/28/2006 9:49:57 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
[ The worlds collided when Bush stood beside Vicente Fox and denounced the Minutemen, folks who had gone to Arizona to help spot illegal aliens for the Border Patrol, as "vigilantes." They thought they were patriots helping Bush defend the nation. ]

Hold it.. am adjusting yup the picture is coming in..
I can see it.. Dubya slapping Vince on the back.. and shaking his hand..
Wonder if Dubya knows Vince is point man for the Mexican Drug Cartels which is the Mexican Government.. Hmmm..

NAH!.. he must be clueless.. Bush that is..

18 posted on 02/28/2006 10:40:52 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man

Obviously someone left the computer room unlocked at the home. Pat snuck in and sent this one out. Why didn't you blame the Jews too Pat?


22 posted on 02/28/2006 12:43:27 PM PST by jmaroneps37 (We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man

Kind of like asking,"... if we are in a "long war" against Islamofascism and homeland security is our highest priority, why are U.S. troops invading Quebec and making those frogs speak English."


24 posted on 02/28/2006 1:49:47 PM PST by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
If there were no State of Israel in the Mideast filled with Jews, Buchanan wouldnt be drawing a line out there, we cant make the Arabs angry,blahblahblah.He would care less. His whole neocon hatred is a camoflauge for his other bugaboo.

Oh, and he'd start a war with Mexico in a second if he could, IMO. So its not like hes a pacifist. Hes just incoherent.

26 posted on 02/28/2006 2:01:55 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man

This is coming from an idiot who thinks that the WOT is a worthless adventure too.

At least the Bush family has WON an election for something. And at least they weren't fired from the Reagan administration either.....


31 posted on 03/02/2006 3:44:48 PM PST by MikefromOhio (22,952+ replies - wow I'm talkative.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson