Posted on 02/25/2006 2:13:58 PM PST by RWR8189
DEMAGOGUES TO THE RIGHT OF THEM, appeasers to the left of them, media in front of them, volleying and thundering. Can the Bush administration continue to charge ahead? Does it have the will--and the competence--to lead the nation for the next three years toward victory in the long war against radical Islamism?
From Copenhagen to Samara, the radical Islamists are on the offensive. From Tehran to Damascus, the dictators are trying to regain the upper hand in the Middle East. From Moscow to Beijing, the enemies of liberal democracy are working to weaken the United States. Across the world, the forces of terror and tyranny are fighting back. Are we up to the challenge?
It's not clear that we are. Many liberals, here and in Europe, long ago lost the nerve to wage war--or even to defend themselves--against illiberalism. Parts of the conservative movement now seem to be losing their nerve as well. In response to an apparent clash of civilizations, they would retrench, hunker down, and let large parts of the world go to hell in a hand basket, hoping that the hand basket won't blow up in our faces.
Remember: The United States of America and its allies--regimes that seek to embody, or at least to move towards, the principles of decent, civilized, liberal democracy--did not seek this war. But we are at war, and we could lose it. Victory is not inevitable.
Does that make Bush-supporting, liberal-democracy-promoting, Iraq-war-defending neoconservative "Leninists," as Francis Fukuyama has recently charged? No. Does it mean we believe--as Fukuyama defines Leninism--that "history can be pushed along with the right application of power and will"? Does it mean that history does not automatically move in the right direction, that justice does not necessarily or easily prevail? Yes.
It would be nice to believe, as Fukuyama does, that "a long-term process of social evolution" is under way that will inevitably produce liberal democracy. It would be nice to enjoy the comfortable complacency of a historical determinism that suggests--as Fukuyama has it--that what we most need to do is to embrace a "good governance agenda" on behalf of a long-term process of "democracy promotion" that "has to await the gradual ripening of political and economic conditions to be effective."
Indeed, it would be nice if we lived in a world in which we didn't have to take the enemies of liberal democracy seriously--a world without jihadists who want to kill and clerics who want to intimidate and tyrants who want to terrorize. It would be nice to wait until we were certain conditions were ripe before we had to act, a world in which the obstacles are trivial and the enemies fold up. Unfortunately, that is not the world we live in.
To govern is to choose, and to accept responsibility for one's choices. To govern is not wishfully to await the end of history. To govern is not fatalistically to watch a clash of civilizations from the sidelines.
As Marshall Wittmann of the Democratic Leadership Council observed last week, "We are in the midst of a jihadist offensive. The bombing of [Iraq's] Askariya Shiite Shrine is another indication of the world-wide jihadist offensive against the West. From the cartoon jihad to the Hamas victory to the Iranian effort to obtain nuclear weapons to the attempt by al Qaeda to foment an Iraqi civil war--our enemy is taking the initiative. And the West is on its heels."
The Bush administration leads the West. If the West seems to be on its heels, it is because the administration seems to be on its heels. The fact that the left is utterly irresponsible, and some of the right is silly, is no excuse.
Wittmann continued, "Many mistakes have been made since 9/11. But at the end of the day, we should recognize that we are all Americans and part of the West that is under assault by a truly evil foe. Our bravest are on the front lines in this war. The least we can do at home is to demonstrate some moral seriousness that the moment demands."
Moral seriousness in this case means political seriousness. Insist on going ahead with the ports deal so that Arab governments who have stood with us in the war on terror are not told to get lost when one of their companies acquires port management contracts in the United States. Make a real effort to destabilize Ahmadinejad in Iran. Do what it takes to defeat Zarqawi and secure Iraq. Stand with Denmark, and moderate Muslims, against the radical mob. This is no time for dishonorable retreat. It is time for resolve--and competence. After all, it would be most unfortunate if the administration summoned its nerve and charged ahead--only to meet the fate of Tennyson's Light Brigade!
--William Kristol
It's happening here in the U.S. too; just read all the bizarre apologies for of "moderate" islam in defense of Bush and the P & O deal and it becomes frightenly clear we have now taken the French avenue of appeasement with islam.
No kidding
Indeed.
The liberals think the Third Caliphate is a scare tactic used by conservatives to maintain power. When they figure it out, it will be way too late.
I'm as anti-Islamist as anyone.
But, hell, we need allies to win this war. The UAE has been solid for us all along. There's no reason to piss on them. This is simply a cynical Democratic game that a bunch of Republicans have fallen for for racialist reasons.
If we're going to wage all-out war on Islam, fine. Let's do it. The draft and nukes and all. But if we're not going to, then we need to make compromises and so forth.
More to the point, we're at war. Our President needs our support, not our whining. If you've nothing useful to say, I suggest, you can best serve the nation by keeping your damned mouth shut.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1595230211/qid=1139189351/sr=1-6/ref=sr_1_6/104-8051195-6435107?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
To those who have taken sides with the pro-DPWorld/UAE contingent of status quo government bureaucrats, enjoy this sweetheart deal. Now you can lie in bed with the dirty "jihadists" who helped sponsor 9-11, who supported the Taliban-Al Qaeda for years, who gave cover to Osama Bin Laden and who gave refuge to terrorists for decades. People need to wake up and understand that "jihadism" is alive and well throughout the ME. Including, in the UAE.
The UAE is not a solid ally. They require our presence to protect them from Iran. They have taken some positive steps but we would be fools to treat them any differently than any other Muslims, who can reasonably be presumed enemies unless proven otherwise. The UAE is an autocracy and one coup could turn it into a Taliban-like enemy overnight. The people of the UAE by and large hate us, and not one would be convinced of our good will by permitting their autocratic government to conduct this business.
.
For victory in our new worldwide War on Terrorism...
..all we have to do is follow the inspiring 9/11 Example already set by...
The Man Who Predicted 9/11: RICK RESCORLA, ..R.I.P.
http://www.RickRescorla.com
http://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24361
...So shared former CIA Director JAMES WOOLSEY shortly after the Attacks of September 11, 2001.
.
If the West would only wake up and take a lesson from the Australians. Their leaders have come out with incredibly straight talk to the muslims..."Accept our way of life or go home". I wish President Bush would show some spine and
make that kind of declaration! Don't hold your breath!
The "chickenhawk" slur is mean and a cheap shot. But isn't it a little offensive to read this lisping girlyman questioning anyone's "nerve"?
"The liberals think the Third Caliphate is a scare tactic"
And many leftists think a Third Caliphate would be just great. They despise the United States and the West and would love to have a powerful ally that feels the same.
Let me fix that for you Bill...
"The Bush administration leads the West. If the West seems to be on its heels, it is because the administration seems to be on its heels. The fact that the left is utterly responsible, and some of the right is silly, is no excuse. "
Sad but true. I see it here in my school, where those who are supposed the most liberal in support of free expression, speech, and human rights are the ones the least willing to fight. I astounded a senior today with the litany of terror attacks, starting with the 1970 hijackings and the 1972 Olympics massacre, and she just stared at me with wide-open eyes and a look like, "Why didn't they teach me this in history class?"
My own observation is that the West, like Islam, has a death cult. In Islam, the death cult goes by a number of names and affiliations, but basically followers commit suicide, kill anyone they can, and voice antisemetic, anti-American ravings. The Western death cult is socialism, which also goes by a variety of names and affiliations, but basically followers venerate equality to the point of totalitarianism, oppress and debase anyone they can, and voice anticapitalist, antisemetic, and anti-American ravings. After all, the socialists have murdered 50 to 100 million so far - a figure that makes the Islamists look like pikers.
(Tsk, tsk, tsk. Lost for a theme he resorts to the Charge of the Light Brigade.)
Somebody's splashing on the British Sterling a mite too liberally, sir.
Towel off and carry on!
A shameless plug if I've ever seen one.
OK I'm listening, where's the examples other than two of the nineteen were from the UAE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.