Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chertoff Defends Review of Ports Takeover
Yahoo News ^ | FEB.19, 2006 | WILL LESTER

Posted on 02/19/2006 8:44:08 AM PST by radar101

Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff on Sunday defended the government's security review of an Arab company given permission to take over operations at six major U.S. ports.

"We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week."

London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., was bought last week by Dubai Ports World, a state-owned business from the United Arab Emirates. Peninsular and Oriental runs major commercial operations in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

U.S. lawmakers from both parties are questioning the sale, approved by the Bush administration, as a possible risk to national security.

"It's unbelievably tone deaf politically at this point in our history," Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C. said on "Fox News Sunday."

"Most Americans are scratching their heads, wondering why this company from this region now," Graham said.

Added Sen. Evan Bayh (news, bio, voting record), D-Ind.: "I think we've got to look into this company. We've got to ensure ... the American people that their national security interests are going to be protected."

At least one Senate oversight hearing is planned for later this month.

"Congress is welcome to look at this and can get classified briefings," Chertoff told CNN's "Late Edition."

"We have to balance the paramount urgency of security against the fact that we still want to have a robust global trading system," he added.

Sen. Robert Menendez, who is working on legislation to prohibit companies owned or controlled by foreign governments from running port operation in the U.S., said Chertoff's comments showed him that the administration "just does not get it."

In a statement, the New Jersey Democrat said, "No matter what steps the administration claims it has secretly taken, it is an unacceptable risk to turn control of our ports over to a foreign government, particularly one with a troubling history. We cannot depend on promises a foreign government has given the administration in secret to secure our ports."

Chertoff said Dubai Ports World should not be excluded automatically from such a deal because it is based in the UAE.

Critics have cited the UAE's history as an operational and financial base for the hijackers who carried out the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

In addition, they contend the UAE was an important transfer point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist.

DP World has said it intends to "maintain and, where appropriate, enhance current security arrangements." The UAE's foreign minister has described his country as an important U.S. ally in fighting terrorism.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: betrayalofourcountry; camelintent; chertoff; dhs; globalony; helptheenemy; homelandsecurity; hypocrite; theenemywithin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
Another strike against Republicans and Bush. "Oh, yeah--we are fighting terrorists" Our military is, but the Administration is giving away the country.
1 posted on 02/19/2006 8:44:09 AM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

Chertoff is bad news in every way, all along.....the only question I have is which pipers tune does he dance to?


2 posted on 02/19/2006 8:48:24 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Chertnoff is once again wrong. Either he is clueless or . . .
3 posted on 02/19/2006 8:49:42 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Another unnecessary, self inflicted black eye.
4 posted on 02/19/2006 8:49:57 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Chertoff the f-off


5 posted on 02/19/2006 8:51:15 AM PST by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr; DTogo; AZ_Cowboy; Itzlzha; Stellar Dendrite; NRA2BFree; Happy2BMe; Spiff; Pelham; ...

ping


6 posted on 02/19/2006 8:52:05 AM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Isn't Chertoff a clinton hold over?


7 posted on 02/19/2006 8:52:38 AM PST by LucyT (It's 72 white grapes; it never was 72 virgins: http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101

"Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff on Sunday defended the government's security review of an Arab company given permission to take over operations at six major U.S. ports."

Hmmmm, Mr. Chertoff...I say, hmmmm, Mr. Chertoff...I SAY, HMMMM MR. CHERTOFF...


8 posted on 02/19/2006 8:52:48 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
"We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week."


9 posted on 02/19/2006 8:53:07 AM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb Republicans - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

This is going to be a PR disaster for the Republicans if this deal is not quashed ASAP. The Dems will use it to claim they are stronger on anti-terrorism than the GOP.

This is a BAD move for the GOP. What are they thinking?


10 posted on 02/19/2006 8:53:28 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: radar101

This entire situation is the breaking point for me.

The border situation is bad enough but this is the payoff.

Bush et al should be ashamed of themselves.


11 posted on 02/19/2006 8:53:47 AM PST by Mears (The Killer Queen-caviar and cigarettes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Chertoff is so far....unimpressive.

I am trying to be polite here.


12 posted on 02/19/2006 8:54:14 AM PST by trubluolyguy (Islam, Religion of Peace and they'll kill you to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
While I am no fan of the buyer of this 'port' business, seems that port security is already run by foreigners. I do not recall Congress whelping about security before now.
13 posted on 02/19/2006 8:54:43 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Here is an interesting bit of news out of the UAE company

http://dpiterminals.com/fullnews.asp?NewsID=39


14 posted on 02/19/2006 8:55:30 AM PST by Lobbyist (I want my American dream!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

No, in fact he was Repub counsel to one of the Commitees that investigated the klintons.....whitewater, etc, I think.


15 posted on 02/19/2006 8:55:51 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47

Exactly.


16 posted on 02/19/2006 8:57:26 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
Isn't Chertoff a clinton hold over?

Can't blame him on Clinton, when he's in a position that didn't exist back then.
17 posted on 02/19/2006 8:57:37 AM PST by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: radar101

"We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint," Chertoff said on ABC's "This Week."


This from the guy who denies Mexican military excursions into the US by saying they were lost after crossing the Rio Grande....our borders are a sieve....yeah I trust him/not......


18 posted on 02/19/2006 8:59:08 AM PST by rolling_stone (Question Authority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
This is a BAD move for the GOP. What are they thinking?

Obviously they are thinking $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
19 posted on 02/19/2006 8:59:20 AM PST by BubbaTheRocketScientist (We're from the town with the Super Bowl Team, we cheer the Pittsburgh Steelers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Well, they will only be doing the terrorism that Americans won't do.

Can anyone imagine, you can't be a mentally disordered globalist however, inviting an enemy, sworn to kill you, your wife, your children and destroy the US Constitution, sit down at you table for dinner, and then give him a room to live in your home? GWB has lost his mind. His version of amnesty for criminal aliens and his reluctance to defend our borders announced it first, and now this proves it.

I actually think the very liberal Democrats have something, that he must be impeached, but not for be anti-liberal but only for being an enemy within.
20 posted on 02/19/2006 8:59:49 AM PST by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson