Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China radar at South Pole could sabotage U.S. spy satellites
World Tribune ^ | 2/2/06

Posted on 02/02/2006 10:23:51 PM PST by LibWhacker

Beijing announced plans last week to build a high-frequency radar on the South Pole. Analysts say the radar could be used to disrupt U.S. intelligence satellites.


China's Zhongshan Station in Antarctica on
Jan. 24. AP Photo /Xinhua, Zhang Zongtang

The radar will be built at China’s Zhongshan Station, where Beijing has set up of a space environment lab.

National security analysts say the South Pole site, because of its remoteness, could be used by China to develop anti-satellite lasers capable of blinding or disrupting U.S. reconnaissance satellites, most of which pass over the pole.

The station will consist of 20 antenna units, including 16 units for the main antenna and four for the auxiliary antenna. Each antenna is 20 meters high. The high-frequency radar can detect ionospheric convection within a range of 3,000 kilometers.

Chinese officials told Xinhua the station would be used to measure the polar space environment.

China’s space program, unlike the U.S. space program, is directly related to Chinese military operations.

A Pentagon report on the Chinese military last year said China was “working on, and plans to field, ASAT systems.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: american; antarctica; antisatellite; china; disrupt; intelligence; radar; reconnaissance; satellites; southpole; station; zhongshan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2006 10:23:53 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Why not just build it in China? They have total control there. Anybody could watch them in Antarctica.


2 posted on 02/02/2006 10:30:26 PM PST by Nateman (Stop the spin! Flush Clinton again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

So blind it back.


3 posted on 02/02/2006 10:30:36 PM PST by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
National security analysts say the South Pole site, because of its remoteness,

And likewise, the easiest targetable outpost on the planet...

4 posted on 02/02/2006 10:31:34 PM PST by quantim (If the Constitution were perfect it wouldn't have included the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Message to ANYONE in Washington who is; listening, not a liberal, not taking bribes, not a muslim, not suicidal, not an imbecile, not anti-american, not a chinese spy-

DON'T LET THE CHINESE DEVELOP AN ABILITY TO CRIPPLE OUR NEAR SPACE ASSETS.


5 posted on 02/02/2006 10:33:28 PM PST by Hypervigilant (Iran, you are next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

But how much power could these radars direct at satellits? Unless the Chinese have a small nuclear power generating station at their research station, I think they'd have difficulty keeping enough fuel available to power the radars. Just about everything delivered to the south pole is brought by air.


6 posted on 02/02/2006 10:33:36 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Becasue many of the satellites they would want to disable do not fly over China


7 posted on 02/02/2006 10:34:16 PM PST by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; TigerLikesRooster; Tailgunner Joe

ping


8 posted on 02/02/2006 10:38:23 PM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starwolf; Nateman
Becasue many of the satellites they would want to disable do not fly over China

Of course they fly over China, but they also fly over the rest of the world too. Since they are in polar orbits the fly over both polar regions every orbit whereas they would only be seen over China for a fraction of the orbits.

9 posted on 02/02/2006 10:38:49 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Barf: The minute we move in there, they'll spot us on their radar.

Lone Star: Unnn uhh! Not if we jam it!

10 posted on 02/02/2006 10:42:40 PM PST by RPTMS (http://www.wiccabilly.com/images/vandriessen.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

What part of "pole" don't you understand?

The poles are stationary points wrt the earth's rotation. Satellites in polar, or near polar, orbits will cross near the poles on every orbit, but will visit mid-latitude points only occasionally as the earth turns underneath the inertially fixed plane of the orbit.


11 posted on 02/02/2006 10:45:00 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

ping


12 posted on 02/02/2006 10:48:00 PM PST by B4Ranch (No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
Rather expensive to knock them down in Antarctica when you can simply wait for them to pass over China and then destroy them. Unless the satellite is in a 24 hour orbit it will pass over any territory in a polar orbit eventually.
13 posted on 02/02/2006 10:57:24 PM PST by Nateman (Stop the spin! Flush Clinton again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
dr_lew Rather expensive to knock them down in Antarctica when you can simply wait for them to pass over China and then destroy them. Unless the satellite is in a 24 hour orbit it will pass over any territory in a polar orbit eventually.

But if you want to take them all out very quickly, it's an ideal location except for the logistics. In a war, you would want to knock them out as quickly as possible.

14 posted on 02/02/2006 11:16:40 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

If the satellites are in polar orbits, they pass over the poles every 1.5-2 hours, if they are in LEO. You might have to wait a day or more to get a shot at them from any particular mid-latitude longitude. The pole provides an obviously advantageous base of operations for this reason. Whether this justifies the supposition that the Chinese motives are other than purely scientific, I couldn't say, except I don't think the Chinese could recognize a purely scientific motive if it bit them in the ass.


15 posted on 02/02/2006 11:19:30 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
WAR, you say? What war? The Chinese are our good and loyal friends and trading partners.

Why, they are just days away from bursting out into "democracy."

You will of course, ignore the fact that every six months one of their crazy leaders threatens to nuke us. Wouldn't want to interfere with the ability of the American people to buy cheap toasters (thus increasing our standard of living), or anything.

16 posted on 02/02/2006 11:23:52 PM PST by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew; All

Every knows the Chinese are there because they are looking for the Nazi UFO Base! /s

http://www.germanufochatter.com/Nazi-South-Polar-Base/


17 posted on 02/02/2006 11:24:44 PM PST by Tyche (It is easier to take life than to give it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Isn't there a treaty which forbids militarization of the South Pole?

This would seem like a clear violation.

Although I have to admit that the South Pole would be a nice place to test an EMP weapon.


18 posted on 02/02/2006 11:26:32 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Welp, if you are going to disrupt US sats you won't gain anything by disrupting them while they are over the pole. There is little that can be done to them aside from maybe a powerful high temp laser, something the chinese have a long ways to go and by time they have it we will have more laser resistent sats up.


19 posted on 02/02/2006 11:33:30 PM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RPTMS

LOL. Only one country would Dare give us the rasberry...


20 posted on 02/02/2006 11:39:50 PM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson