To: DevSix; Sarajevo; jb6; Romanov
The third-generation body armor the Army is looking at, which at 31 pounds weighs twice as much as the current vest, could actually interfere with soldiers' ability to operate, Wells said. "Let's look at the weight," he said. "And what is this taking away tactically from the soldier in terms of speed and maneuverability that can have an adverse effect?"
Thirty-one pounds will create slow targets for the enemy. I would rather be a faster and more elusive.
5 posted on
02/01/2006 10:36:25 PM PST by
GarySpFc
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: GarySpFc
Oh, good God. A 31 pound vest on top of a 70 lb ruck, a 10 lb uniform, your weapon, ammunition, water, MREs, etc. Yeah, you'll be able to roll and manuever all right. Not to mention the present crappy vest (the chicken vest worn by crew members stops bullets better, we shot both in Bosnia to test them) raises you core body temp by 10 degrees.
6 posted on
02/01/2006 10:43:55 PM PST by
jb6
(The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
To: GarySpFc; jb6
"I would rather be a faster and more elusive."What about on a security detail at a Baghdad intersection?
Granted while on patrol in full gear, the load is HEAVY! But without the pack and everything else close in a vehicle, having that extra protection is lighter with that peace of mind.
7 posted on
02/01/2006 10:51:35 PM PST by
endthematrix
(None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
To: GarySpFc
31lbs is nuts, especially in that environment.
14 posted on
02/02/2006 7:42:46 AM PST by
Sarajevo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson