Posted on 01/29/2006 9:55:09 AM PST by SandRat
ELGIN ¡ª The federal government took to the air to kill 200 coyotes in Southeast Arizona over the past three weeks, in response to ranchers' concerns they were eating calves. Wildlife Services, a federal program formerly known as Animal Damage Control, wrapped up aerial gunning Friday. It hunted on private and public land, including national forest land, used by 10 to 15 ranchers in Cochise and Santa Cruz counties, said a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which runs the program. A rancher from the Elgin area said every calf lost to a coyote ultimately costs him $500 to $650 that the calf could have fetched at market if it lived to maturity. "I have seen coyotes attack my calves three times," said Rex Dalton, who has ranched for two years near Elgin on 8,000 acres of private, state and U.S. Bureau of Land Management land. "I've also seen others with their tails or noses chewed off." But environmentalists were upset that the government gave no advance public notice of the latest shootings, which they call inhumane and ineffective. "There was no public awareness and no public alert, even though the Coronado National Forest is known as a recreational use area," said environmental activist Matt Skroch, executive director of the Sky Island Alliance. "Who do these people work for ¡ª the federal government or ranchers?" he asked. On Friday, a small plane that appeared to be working for the program flew around and swooped close to the ground on private and federal land across the eastern edge of the San Rafael Valley in Santa Cruz County. The sound of gunshots came twice from the plane's general area, both times after the plane was heard throttling back its engine. Wildlife Services spokeswoman Teresa Howes said she doesn't know if that plane was one of theirs. Howes said the agency does not issue press releases on this activity "because we do work for private owners." Ranchers pay the aerial program's entire $200-an-hour cost, for renting aircraft and for staff time, she said. The general public should have a say, countered an ecologist for the Tucson-based environmental advocacy group Center for Biological Diversity. "The burden to show that this is necessary falls on the government," said Daniel Patterson. "There was no transparency. This is disturbing." The program has received little publicity in Southern Arizona in recent years, although it had been conducting aerial gunning in Cochise County regularly over that time, Howes said. It started aerial control in Santa Cruz County this year. Aerial gunning is the least expensive and most efficient way to kill and remove coyotes, Howes said. It gives wildlife-control agents more precision in making sure they don't hit other wildlife, she said. "When you see something from the air, you can directly remove it. It's the least invasive," Howes said. "You can see it better. "It takes a lot of skill," she added. "There are a lot of guidelines and regulations that a pilot must adhere to." The 200 coyotes represent 1 percent or less of the area's entire coyote population, and new ones will arrive in dead coyotes' territories within months, Arizona Game and Fish officials said. Even within ranch country, the program is controversial. Rancher Mac Donaldson, whose Empire Ranch near Sonoita lies north of where the predator-control activity was occurring, said he typically doesn't kill predators or have them killed because he doesn't think it's necessary. Coyotes are a minor threat to calves, mostly taking weak or dying ones, he said. San Rafael Valley rancher Ross Humphreys said he has avoided coyote attacks by arranging to do calving in the summer, when coyotes have more food choices. He can do that only because he operates on private land, he said. Federal-land ranchers must get their calves born early in the year because of how their grazing permits work, he said. "We don't have a predator problem," Humphreys said. Elgin-area ranchers Scott and Kathy Martin disagree. The coyotes are "heavily concentrated everywhere ¡ª they are thick right now," Kathy Martin said Saturday. "I go on walks in the morning, I see them all the time. They like to hang out close to our houses ¡ For the most part, they don't viciously attack unless they are rabid, but we'd kind of like to reduce the concentrations." Dalton said coyotes have eaten about 10 of his calves per year, out of a total herd of 200. "Calf losses are only part of the problem," he said. Coyotes can keep calves from going to water or spots where food supplements are kept, he said. The coyotes can also affect cattle breeding and where ranchers move them. "There are some beneficial uses of coyotes," said Dr. Gary Thrasher, a veterinarian who was at Dalton's Rose Tree Ranch Friday. "They keep rodents down and rabbits down. It's a matter of keeping them in balance." No documentation was available Friday of how many calves coyotes had killed, but Howes said the federal program has confirmed calf losses due to coyotes in Southeast Arizona. The coyote-killing is supported by the Arizona Game and Fish Department, which says it helps shield pronghorn antelope fawns from predators. Officials said coyote killings at a crucial time for young antelope give fawns a better chance of survival. When adult coyotes are removed, it temporarily thins out the population. Coyotes that move in as replacements are younger and less strong at first, said John Millican, a wildlife manager for Game and Fish's Sierra Vista office. In such cases, antelope fawn survival, normally less than 20 percent, can jump to as high as 80 percent and last year reached 46 percent in the area near Elgin south of Arizona 82, he said. Nonetheless, the Sky Island Alliance will push for a new environmental analysis of the effects of the hunts, including the potential impact on jaguars that could live in the region, said its director, Skroch.
¡ñ Contact reporter Tony Davis at 806-7746 or tdavis@azstarnet.com.
arrrrrgggg!!! Paragraphing is our Friend
ELGIN — The federal government took to the air to kill 200 coyotes in Southeast Arizona over the past three weeks, in response to ranchers' concerns they were eating calves.
Wildlife Services, a federal program formerly known as Animal Damage Control, wrapped up aerial gunning Friday.
It hunted on private and public land, including national forest land, used by 10 to 15 ranchers in Cochise and Santa Cruz counties, said a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which runs the program.
A rancher from the Elgin area said every calf lost to a coyote ultimately costs him $500 to $650 that the calf could have fetched at market if it lived to maturity.
"I have seen coyotes attack my calves three times," said Rex Dalton, who has ranched for two years near Elgin on 8,000 acres of private, state and U.S. Bureau of Land Management land. "I've also seen others with their tails or noses chewed off."
But environmentalists were upset that the government gave no advance public notice of the latest shootings, which they call inhumane and ineffective.
"There was no public awareness and no public alert, even though the Coronado National Forest is known as a recreational use area," said environmental activist Matt Skroch, executive director of the Sky Island Alliance.
"Who do these people work for — the federal government or ranchers?" he asked.
On Friday, a small plane that appeared to be working for the program flew around and swooped close to the ground on private and federal land across the eastern edge of the San Rafael Valley in Santa Cruz County.
The sound of gunshots came twice from the plane's general area, both times after the plane was heard throttling back its engine. Wildlife Services spokeswoman Teresa Howes said she doesn't know if that plane was one of theirs.
Howes said the agency does not issue press releases on this activity "because we do work for private owners."
Ranchers pay the aerial program's entire $200-an-hour cost, for renting aircraft and for staff time, she said.
The general public should have a say, countered an ecologist for the Tucson-based environmental advocacy group Center for Biological Diversity.
"The burden to show that this is necessary falls on the government," said Daniel Patterson. "There was no transparency. This is disturbing."
The program has received little publicity in Southern Arizona in recent years, although it had been conducting aerial gunning in Cochise County regularly over that time, Howes said. It started aerial control in Santa Cruz County this year.
Aerial gunning is the least expensive and most efficient way to kill and remove coyotes, Howes said. It gives wildlife-control agents more precision in making sure they don't hit other wildlife, she said.
"When you see something from the air, you can directly remove it. It's the least invasive," Howes said. "You can see it better.
"It takes a lot of skill," she added. "There are a lot of guidelines and regulations that a pilot must adhere to."
The 200 coyotes represent 1 percent or less of the area's entire coyote population, and new ones will arrive in dead coyotes' territories within months, Arizona Game and Fish officials said.
Even within ranch country, the program is controversial.
Rancher Mac Donaldson, whose Empire Ranch near Sonoita lies north of where the predator-control activity was occurring, said he typically doesn't kill predators or have them killed because he doesn't think it's necessary.
Coyotes are a minor threat to calves, mostly taking weak or dying ones, he said.
San Rafael Valley rancher Ross Humphreys said he has avoided coyote attacks by arranging to do calving in the summer, when coyotes have more food choices. He can do that only because he operates on private land, he said. Federal-land ranchers must get their calves born early in the year because of how their grazing permits work, he said.
"We don't have a predator problem," Humphreys said.
Elgin-area ranchers Scott and Kathy Martin disagree.
The coyotes are "heavily concentrated everywhere — they are thick right now," Kathy Martin said Saturday. "I go on walks in the morning, I see them all the time. They like to hang out close to our houses … For the most part, they don't viciously attack unless they are rabid, but we'd kind of like to reduce the concentrations."
Dalton said coyotes have eaten about 10 of his calves per year, out of a total herd of 200.
"Calf losses are only part of the problem," he said. Coyotes can keep calves from going to water or spots where food supplements are kept, he said. The coyotes can also affect cattle breeding and where ranchers move them.
"There are some beneficial uses of coyotes," said Dr. Gary Thrasher, a veterinarian who was at Dalton's Rose Tree Ranch Friday. "They keep rodents down and rabbits down. It's a matter of keeping them in balance."
No documentation was available Friday of how many calves coyotes had killed, but Howes said the federal program has confirmed calf losses due to coyotes in Southeast Arizona.
The coyote-killing is supported by the Arizona Game and Fish Department, which says it helps shield pronghorn antelope fawns from predators.
Officials said coyote killings at a crucial time for young antelope give fawns a better chance of survival.
When adult coyotes are removed, it temporarily thins out the population. Coyotes that move in as replacements are younger and less strong at first, said John Millican, a wildlife manager for Game and Fish's Sierra Vista office.
In such cases, antelope fawn survival, normally less than 20 percent, can jump to as high as 80 percent and last year reached 46 percent in the area near Elgin south of Arizona 82, he said.
Nonetheless, the Sky Island Alliance will push for a new environmental analysis of the effects of the hunts, including the potential impact on jaguars that could live in the region, said its director, Skroch.
Contact reporter Tony Davis at 806-7746 or tdavis@azstarnet.com.
For the NRA - Hunters Pings
Buzzards are a BIG problem with newborn calves as well.
Howes continued saying," and it's a heck of allot of fun! Especially when they try to evade us... they can run, but they can't hide."
I'm a little more conflicted. Perhaps the Sierra Club types could start a fund to compensate the ranchers for losses, in return for leaving the coyotes alone?
-ccm
Hmm, that shouldn't take long. Any rifleman who can hit a running coyote from an airplane in flight should have no trouble distinguishing a little brown dog from a large black and yellow spotted cat.
-ccm
My eyes!!!!
They used to do this around Salmon ID and kill thousands every winter, don't know if they still do. One year when hunting in Utah, the ranchers would give you a dressed out lamb for a pair of coyote ears, we got 2.
You can swoop down on the little pointy-nosed b@$tards while they are in full flight and blast them with some "bb" or single-ought buck from a 12-ga. Just remember that you are going faster than the coyote, so you have to "lag" 'em rather than "lead" 'em.
It was in a more enlightened era, BE (before environmentalists), and the state paid us a bounty on them.
Hey I fixed it in the very next one
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.