Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palestinian Nazis in a Landslide--Just how radical is Hamas? Worse than you can imagine.
Frontpagemagazine/DiscoverTheNetworks.org ^

Posted on 01/27/2006 7:06:50 AM PST by SJackson

Hamas

URL : http://www.hamasonline.com/


  • Islamic terrorist group founded in 1987
  • Received funding from Saddam Hussein
  • Receives funding from Iran
  • Responsible for many suicide bombings and terrorist acts against Israeli targets 
  • In 1995, entered into an alliance with the Palestinian Authority
  • "There is no other solution for the Palestinian problem other than jihad [holy war]."



Hamas' landslide victory in the Palestinian elections this week stunned Israel, prompting the acting Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, to hold an emergency cabinet meeting, after which he announced that peace talks with Hamas are out of the question. It is expected that Israel will now speed up construction of the partially completed anti-terrorism separation barrier that runs along and through parts of the West Bank. To understand why Israel has reacted with such alarm to the election results, one must look at the nature and objectives of Hamas. 

Hamas (Harakat al-Muqawamat al-Islamiyya - "Islamic Resistance Movement") is a radical fundamentalist group that was founded on December 14, 1987 by the 69-year-old Muslim Brotherhood organization. As a single Arabic word rather than an acronym, "Hamas" means "zeal." With tens of thousands of loyal supporters, its strength is concentrated principally in the Gaza Strip and a few areas of the West Bank. The group's leadership is dispersed throughout these same areas, with a few senior leaders residing in Syria, Lebanon, and the Gulf States
.

Hamas is best known for using violent means - including suicide bombings against Israeli military and civilian targets - of pursuing its desire to destroy Israel and replace it with an Islamic Palestinian state. Though it receives some funding from Iran, Hamas is supported primarily by donations from Palestinian expatriates around the world and private benefactors in Arab nations. Some clandestine fundraising takes place in Western Europe and North America as well, and there was a significant financial connection between Hamas and the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq.

The Hamas Covenant, written in 1988, declares: "There is no other solution for the Palestinian problem other than jihad [holy war]. All the initiatives and international conferences are a waste of time and a futile game."

W
hen in 1990 Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) chief Yasser Arafat took Iraq President Saddam Hussein's side in the impending Gulf War, Saudi Arabia responded by diverting part of its usual PLO funding instead to Hamas.

After the Gulf War and the start of PLO Oslo peace process negotiations with Israel, Iran reportedly "pledged $30 million a year to uncompromising Hamas, and agreed to train thousands of Hamas activists in Iran and in Hezbollah camps in Lebanon."

"We do not accept…any agreement made by Israel and its supporter America. Our enemy only understands force - so they will get it soon," said Hamas co-founder and "spiritual leader" Sheikh Ahmed Yassin of an October 2000 Israeli-Palestinian cease fire agreement. He warned that his militants would use "stones, guns and explosions," as they did days after he spoke with a car bomb in Jerusalem that killed two young Israelis.

"Surprise the enemy with your operations and brave resistance," said a Hamas leaflet, "with arms, knives, Molotov cocktails and all available resistance tools and forms."

A
fter a "violent incident" in 1994 between Hamas and Arafat's Fatah, the two groups have reached what appears to be a "good cop, bad cop" partnership aimed at manipulating Israel and the West. While Arafat talks peace and calls for Israeli restraint, terrorists from Hamas' military wing, the Izz al-Din al-Qassam ("Allotment of the Power of Religion"), have continued to carry out terrorist and suicide bombings against Israel.

Fatah was "never different from Hamas," said PLO political chief Farouq Al-Qaddoumi on January 3, 2003. "Strategically, we are no different from it."

By 1994, Hamas had said it would cease military operations if Israel and its settlers withdrew completely from the "occupied territories" and restored the "Green Line" of 1948 patrolled by international forces.

The Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram on September 20, 1995 reportedly published the full text of a proposed agreement between Hamas and the Palestinian National Authority. It included provisions "to recognize the right of brothers in Hamas to participate in the institutions of the Palestinian National Authority at all levels," and "to establish a permanent coordinating committee consisting of the two parties 'Fatah and Hamas' to consider all issues."

Hamas founder and leader Sheik Ahmed Yassin was killed on March 22, 2004, by Hellfire missiles fired by Israeli helicopter gun ships. Yasser Arafat declared three days of mourning and praised Yassin.

Yassin was immediately replaced by Hamas co-founder Abdel Aziz al Rantisi, who escaped an Israeli assassination attempt in June 2003. The 54-year-old pediatrician declared himself Yassin's successor without waiting for any formal succession process by the Hamas leadership. He initially threatened retaliatory attacks against both Israel and the United States, but later said that Hamas would target only Israel. On April 17, An Israeli helicopter launched a strike on Rantisi's car, killing him and two others -- one of them a bodyguard.

In April 2004 Yasser Arafat told the German magazine Focus that he was prepared to include Hamas and Islamic Jihad in a new leadership structure to operate in parallel with the Palestinian Authority. 

"Forming a unified Palestinian leadership does not contradict the Palestinian Authority," Fatah Central Committee member Hani al-Hassan told Fatah-connected newspaper Al-Ayyam, "as it is an internal Palestinian factional issue."

"We think that all political movements should take part in the political decision-making process," said senior Hamas figure Sheikh Said Siam. "We want a political partnership along new guidelines which take into account the weight of the various movements."

Hamas, most of whose supporters live in Gaza, is among the strongest and most popular of Palestinian movements. This is attributed partly to its zeal, partly to the social services it provides to the poor where the Palestinian Authority has not, and largely to a perception among Palestinians that Hamas, whatever its faults, is more honest than those formerly in positions of power in Arafat's Palestinian Authority.

In March 2005, FBI Director Robert Mueller stated that Hamas was capable of attacking targets not only in Israel but in the United States as well. "Of all the Palestinian groups," said Mueller, "Hamas has the largest presence in the United States with a strong infrastructure, primarily focused on fundraising, propaganda for the Palestinian cause, and proselytizing. Although it would be a major strategic shift for Hamas, its United States network is theoretically capable of facilitating acts of terrorism in the United States." In October 2005 an FBI counterterrorism agent in New York reaffirmed Mueller's assertions, stating "We have information Hamas agents have been on U.S. soil the past few years and that the group may currently have up to 100 agents operating inside America." The agent made these comments shortly after Hamas chief Mahmoud al-Zahar had warned that President Bush's actions in the Middle East are "placing America in danger."

Terrorism expert Steve Emerson has stated, "Hamas has an extensive infrastructure in the U.S. mostly revolving around the activities of fundraising, recruiting and training members, directing operations against Israel, organizing political support and operating through human rights front groups. While Hamas has not acted outside Israel, it has the capability of carrying out attacks in America if it decided to enlarge the scope of its operations."

In August 2005, the founders and political leaders of Hamas joined forces to publicly announce that their organization's attacks against Israeli targets would continue even after Israel's impending withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. Claiming credit for the Palestinian "victory" that was purportedly forcing Israel out of the region, senior Hamas member Ismail Haniyye characterized Israel's withdrawal as a "retreat" that was "a result of resistance and our people's sacrifice." "It is evidence that resistance is able to achieve our national goals," he added. Promising more violence, Haniyye declared, "Hamas confirms its adherence to resistance as a strategic option until the occupation retreats from our lands and holy places. Our movement reaffirms that it will protect its military apparatus and Al Qassam Brigades and its weapons and keep them for defending our land."

On November 30, 2005, Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal said that his group would not renew a truce with Israel scheduled to expire at the end of the year, accusing the Jewish state of having violated its agreement to release Palestinian prisoners, end attacks on Palestinian areas, discontinue assassinations of terrorist leaders, and end the confiscation of Palestinian lands. Mashaal also restated Hamas' rejection of U.S. and Israeli demands for his organization to disarm. "All circumstances on the ground, the regional political atmosphere and the Palestinian situation are not encouraging to renew the truce," Mashaal said. "Hamas is not going to renew the truce because Israel did not abide by the conditions of the truce."



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/27/2006 7:06:53 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.

..................

2 posted on 01/27/2006 7:08:12 AM PST by SJackson (elected members of Hamas: businesspeople, professionals, not terrorists. Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

This is all true, but who are they replacing? A front organization that was basically just as bad.

There is no change here.


3 posted on 01/27/2006 7:11:49 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The more of this I see the more I realize just how many of that region's problems will be solved once Iran undergoes a regime change. Remember, it was Russia's Putin who called W and told him they had learned that Iraq has WMD's and was planning an attack on the US. It was at that point the decision was made to move in Iraq. In retrospect I have to wonder if Putin didn't purposely mislead us, knowing that once me moved on Iraq our plate would be full and Iran would have a much smoother ride to nuclear status. It's the Russians who are in bed with Iran on the nuclear thing and it certainly served their purpose to distract us with Iraq while Iran did its thing.

Just idle thoughts.
4 posted on 01/27/2006 7:12:25 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Good to know, but let us all remember.

Arafat and his Fatah were *also* a terrorist group.
So the Palies had a choice between terrorist group A that sometimes warred against Israel and terrorist group B that always warred against Israel.

.. "Fatah was "never different from Hamas," said PLO political chief Farouq Al-Qaddoumi on January 3, 2003. "Strategically, we are no different from it.""

On NPR I heard about 10 minutes discussion on Hamas and the word "terrorist" was never used. A whitewash will happen.

Hamas, without changing one iota, will gain the 'respectability' of being the only player to talk to. ... Just like Arafat's position in the 1990s.

So cheer up! It's no worse than when Arafat the Terrorist was sitting across from the table! (er, that's sarcasm, folks)


5 posted on 01/27/2006 7:13:19 AM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

The only change is the corrupt and inefficient terrorist group has been replaced by the less corrupt yet still inefficient terrorist group.


6 posted on 01/27/2006 7:15:00 AM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

In addition to the fence, I would like to recommend the following:

For each cross-border infraction, Israel should take another 100 yards of the Gaza strip, starting in the North. All persons in that 100 yard strip will be pushed south, all buildings destroyed, and a military zone established.

Eventually, when Hamas commits or allows to be committed from their soil enough terrorist acts, then the whole of Gaza will be in Israeli hands, and free of the terrorists. The Egyptians can figure out how to resettle their Arab brethren.

Then Israel can start on the West Bank.


7 posted on 01/27/2006 7:15:48 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Liberals oppose individual slavery compared to colletive slavery because they hate competition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I hope you're right about the inefficient part.


8 posted on 01/27/2006 7:16:53 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
There is no change here

Exactly. They just take turns at 'let's pretend not to be terrorists', in order to receive funding and land. And not even pretending well.

9 posted on 01/27/2006 7:19:09 AM PST by Lijahsbubbe (Pelosi employs thousands and won't allow them to unionize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Arafat and his Fatah were *also* a terrorist group. So the Palies had a choice between terrorist group A that sometimes warred against Israel and terrorist group B that always warred against Israel.

Exactly. And virtually the entire palestinian population voted for war. They differed only on tactics.

10 posted on 01/27/2006 7:19:50 AM PST by SJackson (elected members of Hamas: businesspeople, professionals, not terrorists. Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
This is all true, but who are they replacing? A front organization that was basically just as bad. There is no change here.

In essence. But there is a significant legal difference now that Hamas officially constitutes the government of a nation. Israel may now legally retaliate against the hostile acts of a foreign nation rather than the hostile actions of a terrorist group. Israel's defensive options are now much broader.

11 posted on 01/27/2006 7:22:18 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Hamas, without changing one iota, will gain the 'respectability' of being the only player to talk to. ... Just like Arafat's position in the 1990s.

Exactly what we've been seeing (and I've been saying) for so long. And the willingness of the world to keep this pretense alive is putrid.

12 posted on 01/27/2006 7:23:21 AM PST by Lijahsbubbe (Pelosi employs thousands and won't allow them to unionize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"Exactly. And virtually the entire palestinian population voted for war. They differed only on tactics.
"

That's the trouble when you have elections. People don't always vote the way you expect. Democratic forms of government only work when the people voting value freedom and peace. Establishing democratic forms of government in the Middle East is always going to be problematic.

We've had elections in Afghanistan and Iraq. They were successful only because we have troops there. Once the troops are gone, I can almost guarantee that both countries will revert to hard-core Islamist dictatorships. Our mission, I fear, is doomed to failure shortly after we're gone.


13 posted on 01/27/2006 7:23:26 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
Then Israel can start on the West Bank.

Now you're talking.

14 posted on 01/27/2006 7:23:37 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Thanks for the post. One can only look on and shake their heads.


15 posted on 01/27/2006 7:24:05 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Israel may now legally retaliate against the hostile acts of a foreign nation rather than the hostile actions of a terrorist group. Israel's defensive options are now much broader.
Good point.
16 posted on 01/27/2006 7:27:09 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

The main difference is that the Hamas have taken off their ski masks and are showing their faces. That is a big difference. Also, they are state actors now, not anonymous terrorists.


17 posted on 01/27/2006 7:30:58 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Brad Cloven

Very good, but for one point. There is no "West Bank". It was a Soviet construct. There is only Judea and Samaria.


19 posted on 01/27/2006 8:39:55 AM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson